DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of relationship between cracked tooth syndrome and occlusion using Q-ray and T-scan

큐레이(Q-ray)와 티스캔(T-scan)을 사용한 치아균열증후군(cracked tooth syndrome)과 교합 사이의 상관관계에 대한 분석

  • Ahn, Do-Gwan (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Oral Health Science, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Oral Health Science, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yuseong (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Oral Health Science, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Pyo, Se-Wook (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Oral Health Science, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Kyung (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Oral Health Science, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • 안도관 (아주대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 치과보철과) ;
  • 최진우 (아주대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 치과보철과) ;
  • 김유성 (아주대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 치과보철과) ;
  • 표세욱 (아주대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 치과보철과) ;
  • 김희경 (아주대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 치과보철과)
  • Received : 2021.02.19
  • Accepted : 2021.06.21
  • Published : 2021.07.31

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the patient's occlusion and a cracked tooth by using T-scan occlusal analysis and a quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) technology. Materials and methods. This study was carried out on 51 patients having cracked teeth between January, 2019 and December, 2020. The tooth crack was determined with a Q-ray pen and QLF parameters (ΔFmax and ΔRmax) were obtained by a Q-ray software. T-scan tests were conducted to all subjects and then, the occlusal force and disclosing time were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare the occlusal force and disclosing time between cracked teeth groups and contra-lateral normal teeth groups (α = .05). Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare ΔFmax and ΔRmax according to the results of cold/bite tests (α = .05). A Spearman correlation analysis was run to determine the relationship between ΔFmax or ΔRmax and occlusal force or disclosing time (α=.05). Results. The mean occlusal force and disclosing time were significantly higher on cracked teeth than on normal teeth (P < .05). The ΔFmax or ΔRmax were not significantly different according to the results of cold/bite tests (P > .05). There was no correlation between ΔFmax or ΔRmax and occlusal force or disclosing time (P > .05). Conclusion. There was a significant relationship between occlusion and cracked tooth syndrome. QLF has the potential to be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of tooth crack in clinical practice.

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 큐레이(Q-ray)와 티스캔(T-scan)을 사용하여 치아균열증후군(cracked tooth syndrome)과 교합 사이의 상관관계를 평가하는 것이다. 대상 및 방법: 2019년 3월 1일부터 2020년 12월 31일까지 아주대학교병원 치과진료센터 치과보철과에 내원한 환자 중 실험대상 포함기준을 만족하며 치아균열증후군으로 진단된 대구치(실험군)를 1개 이상 가지고 있으나 동일 악궁 반대측에는 정상 치아(대조군)를 가진 환자 51명을 대상으로 하였다. 실험군과 대조군 치아의 사진을 Q-ray pen을 이용해 촬영하여 최대형광소실도(ΔFmax)와 최대적색형광도(ΔRmax)을 측정하였고 T-scan 검사를 통해 실험군과 대조군 치아의 상대적 교합강도 및 편심위운동시 이개시간을 측정하였다. Mann-Whitney U test를 통해 실험군과 대조군 사이의 상대적 교합강도와 이개시간의 차이 및 균열치아의 냉검사와 온검사 결과에 따른 군들 간의 최대형광소실도(ΔFmax)와 최대적색형광도(ΔRmax)의 차이를 통계적으로 분석하였다 (α = .05). Spearman correlation analysis를 이용해 최대형광소실도(ΔFmax)와 최대적색형광도(ΔRmax)와 상대적 교합강도 및 이개시간 간의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 결과: 균열치의 상대적 교합강도 및 이개시간은 정상치아에 비하여 통계적으로 유의하게 컸다 (P < .05). 균열치 중 냉검사와 온검사 결과에 따른 각 군들 간의 최대형광소실도(ΔFmax)와 최대적색형광도(ΔRmax)는 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보이지 않았다(P > .05). Spearman correlation analysis 결과, 최대형광소실도(ΔFmax)와 최대적색형광도(ΔRmax)와 상대적 교합강도 및 이개시간 간에는 유의미한 상관관계가 없었다 (P > .05). 결론: 본 연구의 결과에 따르면 상대적 교합강도와 이개시간 등의 교합 요소는 치아균열증후군의 발병과 연관이 있었다. Q-ray 검사를 통한 최대형광소실도(ΔFmax)와 최대적색형광도(ΔRmax)의 측정은 치아균열증후군의 진단에는 임상적으로 유용하게 사용될 수 있지만, 임상증상과 정량적인 관계를 입증하지는 못하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cameron CE. Cracked-tooth syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc 1964;68:406-11. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0108
  2. Kahler W. The cracked tooth conundrum: terminology, classification, diagnosis, and management. Am J Dent 2008;21:275-82.
  3. Roh BD, Lee YE. Analysis of 154 cases of teeth with cracks. Dent Traumatol 2006;22:118-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00347.x
  4. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr, Loghin S, Berman LH. The cracked tooth: histopathologic and histobacteriologic aspects. J Endod 2015;41:343-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.021
  5. Ellis SG, Macfarlane TV, McCord JF. Influence of patient age on the nature of tooth fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:226-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70161-7
  6. Turp JC, Gobetti JP. The cracked tooth syndrome: an elusive diagnosis. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1502-7. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0060
  7. Ehrmann EH, Tyas MJ. Cracked tooth syndrome: diagnosis, treatment and correlation between symptoms and post-extraction findings. Aust Dent J 1990;35:105-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb05872.x
  8. Berman LH, Kuttler S. Fracture necrosis: diagnosis, prognosis assessment, and treatment recommendations. J Endod 2010;36:442-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.018
  9. Stookey GK. Quantitative light fluorescence: a technology for early monitoring of the caries process. Dent Clin North Am 2005;49:753-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2005.05.009
  10. Jun MK, Park SW, Lee ES, Kim BR, Kim BI. Diagnosis and management of cracked tooth by quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2019;26:324-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.04.025
  11. Jun MK, Ku HM, Kim E, Kim HE, Kwon HK, Kim BI. Detection and analysis of enamel cracks by quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology. J Endod 2016;42:500-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.008
  12. Cohen-Levy J, Cohen N. Computerized occlusal analysis in Dentofacial orthopedics: indications and clinical use the T-scan III system. J Dentofacial Anom Orthod 2012;15:203-27. https://doi.org/10.1051/odfen/2012103
  13. Mizui M, Nabeshima F, Tosa J, Tanaka M, Kawazoe T. Quantitative analysis of occlusal balance in intercuspal position using the T-scan system. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:62-71.
  14. Ayuso-Montero R, Mariano-Hernandez Y, Khoury-Ribas L, Rovira-Lastra B, Willaert E, Martinez-Gomis J. Reliability and validity of T-scan and 3D intraoral scanning for measuring the occlusal contact area. J Prosthodont 2020;29:19-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13096
  15. Bozhkova TP. The T-scan system in evaluating occlusal contacts. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2016;58:122-30. https://doi.org/10.1515/folmed-2016-0015
  16. Mongini F, Tempia-Valenta G, Benvegnu G. Computer-based assessment of habitual mastication. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:638-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90047-8
  17. Swepston JH, Miller AW. The incompletely fractured tooth. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:413-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90165-4
  18. Banerji S, Mehta SB, Millar BJ. Cracked tooth syndrome. Part 1: aetiology and diagnosis. Br Dent J 2010;208:459-63. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.449
  19. Attanasio R. Nocturnal bruxism and its clinical management. Dent Clin North Am 1991;35:245-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01351-9
  20. Schuyler CH. Factors of occlusion applicable to restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1953;3:772-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(53)90146-2
  21. Thornton LJ. Anterior guidance: group function/canine guidance. A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:479-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90048-H
  22. Yaffe A, Ehrlich J. The functional range of tooth contact in lateral gliding movements. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:730-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90373-8
  23. Kim SK, Jung HI, Kim BI. Detection of dentin-exposed occlusal/incisal tooth wear using quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology. J Dent 2020;103:103505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103505