대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제59권3호
  • /
  • Pages.261-270
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경사진 임플란트에서 임플란트 인상의 정확도 평가를 위한 역공학 기법

Reverse engineering technique on the evaluation of impression accuracy in angulated implants

  • 정홍택 (고려대학교 구로병원 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 이기선 (고려대학교 안산병원 치과보철과) ;
  • 송소연 (고려대학교 구로병원 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 박진홍 (고려대학교 구로병원 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 이정열 (고려대학교 구로병원 임상치의학연구소)
  • Jung, Hong-Taek (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Institute of Clinical Dental Research, Korea University of Guro Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Sun (Department of Prosthodontics, Korea University of Ansan Hospital) ;
  • Song, So-Yeon (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Institute of Clinical Dental Research, Korea University of Guro Hospital) ;
  • Park, Jin-Hong (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Institute of Clinical Dental Research, Korea University of Guro Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jeong-Yol (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Institute of Clinical Dental Research, Korea University of Guro Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2021.02.17
  • 심사 : 2021.03.23
  • 발행 : 2021.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 (1) 기존에 존재하던 몇 가지 다른 임플란트 인상의 정확도 평가방법들과 역공학 기술을 비교하고 (2) 역공학 기술로 임플란트 식립 방향 및 임플란트 인상용 코핑의 종류에 따른 인상 채득의 정확도를 평가하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 임플란트 식립 방향에 따른 세 가지 다른 마스터 모델을 제작하였고, 그 중 임플란트를 평행하게 식립한 마스터 모델에서 두 임플란트 중심점 사이의 거리를 다음과 같은 세 가지 방법으로 측정하였다 (디지털 캘리퍼를 이용한 측정 방법(그룹 DC), 광학 사진을 이용한 측정 방법(그룹 OM) 및 역공학 기술을 이용한 측정 방법(그룹 RE)). 세 종류의 마스터 모델 별로 각각 세 가지 유형의 임프레션 코핑을 이용하여 인상을 채득한 후 총 90개의 실험 모델을 제작하였으며 각 실험 모델들과 마스터 모델 간의 각도 및 거리의 오차율(error rate)을 계산하였다. 세 가지 평가 방법 간의 비교에는 One-way ANOVA가 사용되었다 (P < .05). 각 실험 그룹들의 오차율은 two-way ANOVA를 이용하여 분석하였다 (P < .05). 결과: 그룹 DC의 오차율과 그룹 RE의 오차율 간에는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었지만 (P < .05), 그룹 OM의 오차율을 다른 그룹들과 비교하였을 때는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다(P > .05). 역공학 기술로 측정한 오차율의 표준 편차는 디지털 캘리퍼 및 광학 사진 측정으로 계산한 오차율의 표준 편차보다 상당히 낮았다. 하이브리드 인상용 코핑 그룹은 거리 오차율에서 픽업 인상용 코핑 그룹과 큰 차이가 없었다 (P > .05). 결론: 본 실험을 통해 역공학 기술이 임플란트 인상의 삼차원적인 정확도 평가 기법으로서의 잠재력이 있음을 확인하였다.

Purpose. The aim of this study was (1) to compare the reverse engineering technique with other existing measurement methods and (2) to analyze the effect of implant angulations and impression coping types on implant impression accuracy with reverse engineering technique. Materials and methods. Three different master models were fabricated and the distance between the two implant center points in parallel master model was measured with different three methods; digital caliper measurement (Group DC), optical measuring (Group OM), and reverse engineering technique (Group RE). The 90 experimental models were fabricated with three types of impression copings for the three different implant angulation and the angular and distance error rate were calculated. One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among the evaluation methods (P < .05). The error rates of experimental groups were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (P < .05). Results. While there was significant difference between Group DC and RE (P < .05), Group OM had no significant difference compared with other groups (P > .05). The standard deviations in reverse engineering were much lower than those of digital caliper and optical measurement. Hybrid groups had no significant difference from the pick-up groups in distance error rates (P > .05). Conclusion. The reverse engineering technique demonstrated its potential as an evaluation technique of 3D accuracy of impression techniques.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status. Implant Dent 2001;10:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200104000-00003
  2. Lee SE, Yang SE, Lee CW, Lee WS, Lee SY. Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:265-70. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.265
  3. Teo JW, Tan KB, Nicholls JI, Wong KM, Uy J. Three-dimensional accuracy of plastic transfer impression copings for three implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:577-84. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3382
  4. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O, Ozcelik TB, Yagiz A. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants. J Dent 2014;42:1551-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.008
  5. Sorrentino R, Gherlone EF, Calesini G, Zarone F. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:e63-76.
  6. Shim JS, Ryu JJ, Shin SW, Lee JY. Effects of implant angulation and impression coping type on the dimensional accuracy of impressions. Implant Dent 2015;24:726-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000336
  7. De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:329-36. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128070
  8. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3
  9. Gherlone E, Cappare P, Vinci R, Ferrini F, Gastaldi G, Crespi R. Conventional versus digital impressions for "All-on-Four" restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:324-30.
  10. Buonamici F, Carfagni M, Furferi R, Governi L, Lapini A, Volpe Y. Reverse engineering modeling methods and tools: a survey. Computer-Aided Design and Applications 2018;15:443-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2017.1397894
  11. Zheng Y, Lu B, Zhang J, Wu G. CAD/CAM silicone simulator for teaching cheiloplasty: description of the technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;53:194-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.10.001
  12. Loeffelbein DJ, Rau A, Wolff KD. Impression technique for monitoring and virtual treatment planning in nasoalveolar moulding. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:898-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.012
  13. Mestrinho LA, Gordo I, Gawor J, Leal N, Niza M. Retrospective study of 18 titanium alloy crowns produced by computer-aided design and manufacturing in dogs. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:97. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00097
  14. Holler M, Guizar-Sicairos M, Tsai EH, Dinapoli R, Muller E, Bunk O, Raabe J, Aeppli G. High-resolution non-destructive three-dimensional imaging of integrated circuits. Nature 2017;543:402-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21698
  15. Chantarapanich N, Rojanasthien S, Chernchujit B, Mahaisavariya B, Karunratanakul K, Chalermkarnnon P, Glunrawd C, Sitthiseripratip K. 3D CAD/reverse engineering technique for assessment of Thai morphology: Proximal femur and acetabulum. J Orthop Sci 2017;22:703-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2017.02.003
  16. Chen J, Zhang Z, Chen X, Zhang C, Zhang G, Xu Z. Design and manufacture of customized dental implants by using reverse engineering and selective laser melting technology. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112: 1088-95.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.026
  17. Martorelli M, Ausiello P, Morrone R. A new method to assess the accuracy of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scanner by using a non-contact reverse engineering technique. J Dent 2014;42:460-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.018
  18. Everitt BS, Skrondal A. The Cambridge dictionary of statistics. 4th ed. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 89.
  19. United States Department of Commerce. National Institute of Standards and Technology. ASME B89.4. 10-2000 and NISTIR 5686.
  20. Jo SH, Kim KI, Seo JM, Song KY, Park JM, Ahn SG. Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:128-33. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.4.128
  21. Assuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004;13:358-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000144509.58901.f7
  22. Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7
  23. Reddy S, Prasad K, Vakil H, Jain A, Chowdhary R. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants. Niger J Clin Pract 2013;16:279-84. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.113447