DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Decision Making of Cadastral Surveying Results using Drone Photogrammetry

드론항공사진측량을 활용한 지적측량 성과결정에 관한 연구

  • Lim, Seong-Ha (Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation) ;
  • Kim, Ho-Jong (Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation) ;
  • Lee, Don-Sun (Spatial Information Research Institute)
  • 임성하 (한국국토정보공사 글로벌사업처 공간정보사업처) ;
  • 김호종 (한국국토정보공사 혁신전략부) ;
  • 이돈선 (공간정보연구원 연구기획실)
  • Received : 2021.05.04
  • Accepted : 2021.06.28
  • Published : 2021.06.30

Abstract

This study evaluates the applicability of determining cadastral surveying results using drone photogrammetry during the phase of determining cadastral surveying results, which is the most important stage of cadastral surveying, but known to be hardly objective and highly probable in causing a subjective misjudgment or mistake made by a surveyor. In the experiment to analyze the accuracy of boundary point extraction from drone photogrammetry results, by comparing the coordinate area of 22 parcels extracted from 2D and 3D images with the coordinate area measured from ground survey, the difference could be quantified as RMSE of 1.44m2 for 2D and 0.32m2 for 3D images. In addition, experiments to evaluate the determination of cadastral surveying result based on drone photogrammetry survey showed the RMSE measure of 0.346m towards N direction and 0.296m towards Y direction in comparison to the existing surveying results through data investigation. Based on these experiments, it is judged that cadastral surveying result based on drone photogrammetry can be determined without needing to conduct a location survey with an accuracy of approximately 0.3m in the graphical area, which also leads to possibility of reducing individual errors if drones images are used along with ground survey by objectifying the process of cadastral surveying results.

본 연구는 지적측량 단계 중 가장 중요하지만, 객관적이지 못하고 주관에 의해 측량자의 오판이나 실수가 발생할 수 있는 개연성이 큰 지적측량 성과결정 단계에서 드론사진측량을 기반으로 지적측량성과 결정의 적용성을 평가하였다. 드론사진측량 결과물에서 경계점 추출의 정확도를 판단하기 위한 실험에서는 2D와 3D영상에서 추출한 22개 필지의 자표면적과 지상측량 좌표면적을 비교하여 그 차이가 2D영상은 RMSE가 1.44m2, 3D영상은 0.32m2로 정량화할 수 있었다. 또한, 정사영상을 기반으로 지적측량 성과결정을 평가하기 위한 실험에서는 자료조사를 통한 기존 측량성과 결정량과 비교하여 RMSE가 N방향으로 0.346m, E방향으로 0.296m로 나타났다. 이러한 실험결과로 미루어 볼 때 도해지역에서 정사영상기반의 성과 결정시 약 0.3m 내외의 정확도로 현지 측량없이 성과결정이 이루질 수 있으며, 이는 자료조사 및 지상측량과 더불어 정사영상이 활용된다면, 지적측량성과 결정 과정을 더 객관화하여 개인오차를 줄일 수 있다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ko MS. 2016. Analyzing the Resection Method Based Positioning Techniques for Cadastral Survey in Korea. Thesis for Master degree. Graduate Department of Spatial Information University of Seoul.
  2. The Korean Law Information Center, Enforcement Spatial Information Management Act. [http://www.law.go.kr]. Last accessed 12 January 2021.
  3. Ru BC. 2017. Cadastral History. Buyeon Press.
  4. Park WC. 2011. Implementation of Cadastral Results Determine System for Position Accuracy Improvement. Thesis for Doctoral degree. Graduate Department of civil & Environmental Engineering Myongji University.
  5. Park CY. Accuracy Analysis of Parcel Demarcation Using High Resolution Aerial Images in Combination with Airborne LiDAR Data. Thesis for Doctoral degree. Graduate Department of Civil Engineering Dong-A University.
  6. Sung Sm. Quality Verification and Utilization of Ultra-Light UAV Imagery in Parcel Boundary Delineation. Thesis for Master degree. Graduate Department of Civil Engineering Dong-A University.
  7. Yoo JM. 2017. Ortho Image Generation and Accuracy Analysis Using Non-Surveying Drone and Land Boundary Points. Thesis for Master degree. Graduate Department of Civil Engineering Chungnam University.
  8. Lim SH. 2020. A Study on 3D Model Building of Drone-Based Urban Digital Twin. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX 50(1):168-180
  9. 하정이. 2017, UAV를 활용한 지적확정측량 성과검사 방법에 관한 연구. 인하대학교 공간정보학과. 석사학위 논문 A study on validation of cadastral confirmation survey by using UAV. Thesis for Master degree. Graduate Department of Spatial Information Inha University.
  10. Korea Land and Geospatial Informatix Corporation, 2019, Surveying Task System(LandGo) User's Guide V1.0
  11. DG Lowe. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ISBN: 0-7695-0164-8
  12. Noah Snavely. Steven M. Seitz. Richard Szeliski. 2006. Photo tourism: exploring photo collection in 3d. University of Washington.