References
- Ko Y, Seo T. 2005. A Study on the Naming Rules of Metadata based on Ontology. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management. 22(4): 97-109. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.4.097
- Korea Agency for Technology and Standard. 2016. Smart Factory Standardization Status.
- Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement. 2019. Developing Updating Automation and Technique Utilization of Field Applications for the Integrated Underground Space Map.
- National Geospatial Information Institute. 2019. Regulation for constructing 3-Dimension Geospatial Information.
- Kim MS, Park DY. 2020. A Study on Feasible 3D Object Model Generation Plan Based on Utilization, Demand, and Generation Cost. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(1): 215-229. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2020.50.1.215
- Ministry of Economy and Finance. 2020. The Comprehensive Plan for the Korean New Deal.
- The Seoul Institute. 2019. Improvement of the Spatial Information Policy in Seoul.
- 위키피디아. 2021. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RM-ODP]. 2021년 1월 22일 검색.
- Lee S, Jeong D, Jung H, Baik D. 2016. Design and Implementation of Sensor Registry Data Model for IoT Environment. The KIPS Tr. Software and Data Eng. 5(5): 221-230.
- Lee HJ, Kim SH, Lee JY, Yu SK. 2020. Trend Analysis of International Standardization in Digital Twin for Manufacturing for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The Journal of the Korean Institute of Communication Sciences. 37(3):43-50.
- Choi JY, Kim EH. 2020. A Quality Management Model for Consumer-oriented Spatial Information. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(1): 47-62. https://doi.org/10.22640/LXSIRI.2020.50.1.47
- Hwang B, Hwang J, Kim B. 2016. A Study on Policy Improvement for the Systematic Management of the National Geospatial Standards. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 46(2):225-237. https://doi.org/10.22640/lxsiri.2016.46.2.225
- LX. 2020. Development of the Reference Model and Roadmap for the Digital Twin for Land.
- Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. 2019. Strategies for Smartization Marine Fisheries.
- Bacchiega G, Bondani G. 2018. Creating an Embedded Digital Twin: Monitor, Understand and Predict Device Health Failure. Proceeding of Inn4mech 2018.
- Batty M. 2018. Digital Twins. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 45(5): 817-820. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318796416
- Bolton R, McColl-Kennedy J, Cheung L, Gallan A, Orsingher C, Witell L, Zaki M. 2018. Customer Experience Challenges: Bringing Together Digital, Physical and Social Realms. Journal of Service Management. 29(5):776-808. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0113
- Glaessgen E, Stargel D. 2012. The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and US Air Force Vehicles. Proceeding of the 53rd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference: Spatial Session on the Digital Twin. 23-26.
- Grieves M, Vickers J. 2017. Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems. Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems. 85-113.
- ISO. 2005. ISO/TS 19127: Geodetic Codes and Parameters.
- ISO. 2014. ISO 19101-1: Geographic information - Reference model - Part 1: Fundamentals.
- ISO. 2020. ISO 23247: Digital Twin Framework for Manufacturing.
- ISO/IEC. 2015. ISO/IEC 19763: Information technology - Metamodel framework for interoperability.
- ISO/IEC. 2020. Report of ISO/IEC JTC1 AG11 Digital Twin(Version 3.0).
- OGC. 2005. Server Architecture Models for the National Spatial Data Infrastructures.
- Saddik A. 2018. Digital Twins: The Convergence of Multimedia Technologies. IEEE Multimedia. 25(2):87-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/mmul.2018.023121167
- Soderberg R, Wamefjord K, Carlson J, Lindkvist L. 2017. Toward a Digital Twin for Real-Time Geometry Assurance in Individualized Production. Manufacturing Technology. 66(1): 137-140.
- Tao F, Sui F, Liu A, Qi Q. 2018. Digital Twin-Driven Product Design Framework. International Journal of Production Research. 57(1): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1456699
- Wang C, He Y, Ma Y, Liang P. 2009. Theory of Ontology & Meta-modeling and the Standard: An Enabler for Semantic Interoperability. Handbook of Research on Software Engineering and Productivity Technologies: Implications of Globalization, 88-101.