지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)

한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

블록체인 기반 공급사슬관리 서비스 활용의 결정요인 연구

A Study on the Determinants of Blockchain-oriented Supply Chain Management (SCM) Services

  • 권영식 (국민대학교 비즈니스IT전문대학원) ;
  • 안현철 (국민대학교 비즈니스IT전문대학원)
  • Kwon, Youngsig (Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University) ;
  • Ahn, Hyunchul (Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.02
  • 심사 : 2021.04.23
  • 발행 : 2021.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 시장에서의 경쟁이 기업 간의 경쟁에서 공급사슬 간의 경쟁으로 진화해 감에 따라, 공급사슬관리(이하 SCM)를 고도화하기 위한 기업들의 관심이 높아지고 있다. 특히 다양한 기술적 강점을 갖고 있는 블록체인 기술이 SCM과 결합되면서 블록체인 기반의 SCM 서비스 도입을 검토하고 있는 국내 제조, 유통 기업들이 늘어감에 따라, 우리 기업들의 블록체인 기반 SCM 도입에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 대한 연구가 중요해지고 있는 시점이다. 그러나 기존 블록체인 및 SCM에 대한 수용연구들은 대체로 기술수용모형이나 통합기술수용모형에 기반하여 수행되어 왔다. 그러나 이 두 이론적 기반은 개인의 정보기술 수용을 설명하기에는 적합하지만, 기업을 대상으로 하는 정보기술 수용을 설명을 하기에는 다소 부적합한 한계가 있다. 본 연구는 기술-조직-환경(TOE) 프레임워크 이론을 바탕으로 기업을 분석단위(unit of analysis)로 하는 새로운 관점의 블록체인 기반 SCM 수용모형을 제시하고, 기업들이 새로운 정보기술의 도입을 검토할 때 그 기술이 제공하는 혜택(benefit)과 그 기술로 인해 발생하는 손실(sacrifice)을 종합적으로 고려하는 특성을 반영하고자, 본 연구에서는 가치 기반 수용 모형(Value-based Adoption Model)의 관점을 추가로 적용하였다. 본 연구에서는 제안된 연구모델을 검증하기 위하여 국내 제조, 유통 기업 126곳을 대상으로 설문을 통해 데이터를 수집하였으며, PLS 구조방정식모델을 통해 실증적으로 분석하였다. 분석결과 '비즈니스 혁신', '경로추적', '보안강화'와 같은 기술적 관점의 혜택 요인들과 '비용'과 같은 손실 요인이 블록체인 기반 SCM의 '인지된 가치'에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 이는 다시 '사용의도'에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 조직적 관점의 '조직준비도'는 '사용의도'에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났지만, 환경적 관점의 '규제환경'은 예상과 달리 '사용의도'에 유의한 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 본 연구의 발견은 국내 블록체인 기반 SCM 활성화를 위한 실무적, 정책적 대안을 마련하는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Recently, as competition in the market evolves from the competition among companies to the competition among their supply chains, companies are struggling to enhance their supply chain management (hereinafter SCM). In particular, as blockchain technology with various technical advantages is combined with SCM, a lot of domestic manufacturing and distribution companies are considering the adoption of blockchain-oriented SCM (BOSCM) services today. Thus, it is an important academic topic to examine the factors affecting the use of blockchain-oriented SCM. However, most prior studies on blockchain and SCMs have designed their research models based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) or the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), which are suitable for explaining individual's acceptance of information technology rather than companies'. Under this background, this study presents a novel model of blockchain-oriented SCM acceptance model based on the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework to consider companies as the unit of analysis. In addition, Value-based Adoption Model (VAM) is applied to the research model in order to consider the benefits and the sacrifices caused by a new information system comprehensively. To validate the proposed research model, a survey of 126 companies were collected. Among them, by applying PLS-SEM (Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling) with data of 122 companies, the research model was verified. As a result, 'business innovation', 'tracking and tracing', 'security enhancement' and 'cost' from technology viewpoint are found to significantly affect 'perceived value', which in turn affects 'intention to use blockchain-oriented SCM'. Also, 'organization readiness' is found to affect 'intention to use' with statistical significance. However, it is found that 'complexity' and 'regulation environment' have little impact on 'perceived value' and 'intention to use', respectively. It is expected that the findings of this study contribute to preparing practical and policy alternatives for facilitating blockchain-oriented SCM adoption in Korean firms.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 교육부 및 한국연구재단의 4단계 두뇌한국21 사업(4단계 BK21 사업)으로 지원된 연구입니다.

참고문헌

  1. 가회광, 김진수 (2014). An empirical study on the influencing factors for big data intented adoption: Focusing on the strategic value recognition and TOE framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 24(4), 443-472. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2014.24.4.443
  2. 고제욱, 고형석, 남상완, 한경석 (2019). 블록체인 채택에 영향을 미치는 요인 관련 개선된 연구모델 제시를 위한 실증연구. 한국디지털콘텐츠학회논문지, 20(3), 513-526.
  3. 김병곤, 이병길, 윤일기 (2020). 통합기술수용이론 관점에서 블록체인기술의 사용자 수용과 이용 행동에 관한 연구. Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 27(3), 1-18.
  4. 김상현, 박현선, 김보라 (2018). 가치 기반 수용모델에 기반한 지능형 개인비서 서비스 사용에 대한 실증 연구. 지식경영연구, 19(4), 99-118. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2018.19.4.006
  5. 김성영, 안승범 (2018). 블록체인 시스템 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구-물류기업을 중심으로. 한국물류학회지, 28(1), 71-85.
  6. 김정석, 김광용 (2017). 블록체인 기술 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국IT서비스학회지, 16(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2017.16.2.001
  7. 김종필, 송유진 (2018). 블록체인 기술 혜택의 효과가 블록체인 보험 서비스의 수용의도에 미치는 영향: UTAUT 모형을 기반으로. 한국IT서비스학회지, 17(4), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2018.17.4.163
  8. 삼정KPMG 경제연구원 (2018). 블록체인과 물류/유통 혁신, 그리고 디지털 무역. https://home.kpmg/kr/ko/home/insights/2018/06/issue-monitor-201803-85.html
  9. 신건원 (2018). SmartPLS 3.0 구조방정식모델링. 청람.
  10. 신우찬, 안현철 (2019). 클라우드 컴퓨팅 서비스의 혁신특성, 테크노스트레스가 혁신저항 및 수용의도에 미치는 영향: 공공부문 도입을 중심으로. 지식경영연구, 20(2), 59-86. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2019.20.2.004
  11. 윤여준, 신동천 (2017). 스마트폰 백신의 가치와 사용 의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 정보기술아키텍처연구, 14(3), 277-287.
  12. 이지영 (2018). 항공권 온라인 예약 시 브랜드이미지, 가격, 신뢰, 지각된 가치가 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 관광연구, 33(4), 33-57.
  13. 정윤경, 하예영, 이혜인, 양희동 (2020). 공유경제 체제로서 컨소시엄 블록체인을 활용한 와인투자 주식플랫폼 프레임워크. 지식경영연구, 21(3), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.15813/KMR.2020.21.3.003
  14. 최창호, 유연우 (2017). 탐색적 요인 분석과 확인적요인분석의 비교에 관한 연구. 디지털융복합연구, 15(10), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.10.103
  15. 추현우 (2020, 3월 18일). 中 알리바바, 블록체인 기반 해외직구 플랫폼 도입. 디지털투데이, www.digitaltoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=226908
  16. Allison, I. (2017). Maersk and IBM want 10 million shipping containers on the global supply blockchain by year-end. https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/maersk-ibm-aimget-10-million-shipping-containers-onto-globalsupply-blockchain-by-year-end-1609778
  17. Alshamaila, Y., Papagiannidis, S., & Li, F. (2013). Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 26(3), 250-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391311325225
  18. Azzi, R., Chamoun, R. K., & Sokhn, M. (2019). The power of a blockchain-based supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 582-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.042
  19. Banerjee, A. (2018). Blockchain technology: Supply chain insights from ERP. Advances in Computers, 111, 69-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2018.03.007
  20. Chan, F. T., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2013). Determinants of mobile supply chain management system diffusion: A structural equation analysis of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1196-1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.693961
  21. Chang, I. C., Hwang, H. G., Hung, M. C., Lin, M. H., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption of electronic signature: Executives' perspective of hospital information department. Decision Support Systems, 44(1), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.04.006
  22. Chau, P. Y., & Tam, K. Y. (1997). Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/249740
  23. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  24. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  25. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  26. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2004). Measuring e-commerce success: Applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2004.11044317
  27. Diabat, A., & Simchi-Levi, D. (2009, December). A carbon-capped supply chain network problem. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEE, 523-527.
  28. Dobrovnik, M., Herold, D. M., Furst, E., & Kummer, S. (2018). Blockchain for and in Logistics: What to adopt and where to start. Logistics, 2(3), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics2030018
  29. Farooq, S., & O'Brien, C. (2012). A technology selection framework for integrating manufacturing within a supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 50(11), 2987-3010. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.588265
  30. Foerstl, K., Schleper, M. C., & Henke, M. (2017). Purchasing and supply management: From efficiency to effectiveness in an integrated supply chain. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(4), 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.08.004
  31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  32. Gallardo, G., Hernantes, J., & Serrano, N. (2018). Designing SaaS for enterprise adoption based on task, company, and value-chain context. IEEE Internet Computing, 22(4), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1109/mic.2018.043051463
  33. Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012). A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 358-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007
  34. Helo, P., & Hao, Y. (2019). Blockchains in operations and supply chains: A model and reference implementation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.023
  35. Helo, P., & Shamsuzzoha, A. H. M. (2020). Real-time supply chain? A blockchain architecture for project deliveries. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 63, 101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101909
  36. Huy, Q. N. (2012). Emotions in strategic organization: Opportunities for impactful research. Strategic Organization, 10(3), 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453107
  37. Kerin, R. A., Jain, A., & Howard, D. J. (1992). Store shopping experience and consumer price-quality-value perceptions. Journal of Retailing, 68(4), 376.
  38. Kim, H. M., & Laskowski, M. (2018). Agriculture on the blockchain: Sustainable solutions for food, farmers, and financing. Supply Chain Revolution, Barrow Books.
  39. Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009
  40. Kremic, T., Tukel, O. I., & Rom, W. O. (2006). Outsourcing decision support: A survey of benefits, risks, and decision factors. Supply Chain Management, 11(6), 467-482. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540610703864
  41. Kuan, K. K., & Chau, P. Y. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information & Management, 38(8), 507-521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00073-8
  42. Lai, I. K., & Lai, D. C. (2014). User acceptance of mobile commerce: An empirical study in Macau. International Journal of Systems Science, 45(6), 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2012.761471
  43. Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(7), 1006-1023. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111161262
  44. Museli, A., & Navimipour, N. J. (2018). A model for examining the factors impacting the near field communication technology adoption in the organizations. Kybernetes, 47(7), 1378-1400. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2017-0246
  45. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Manubot.
  46. Nunnally, J. C. (1994). Psychometric theory 3E. Tata McGraw-hill Education.
  47. Oliveira, T., & Fraga, M. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110-121.
  48. Pan, M. J., & Jang, W. Y. (2008). Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment framework: Taiwan's communications industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 94-102.
  49. Pick, J. B., & Azari, R. (2011). A global model of technological utilization based on governmental, business-investment, social, and economic factors. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 49-84. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280103
  50. Pilkington, M. (2016). Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In Research handbook on digital transformations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  51. Pudjianto, B., Zo, H., Ciganek, A. P., & Rho, J. J. (2011). Determinants of e-government assimilation in Indonesia: An empirical investigation using a TOE framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 49-80.
  52. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications. In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation (pp. 25-38). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  53. Schniederjans, D., & Yadav, S. (2013). Successful ERP implementation: An integrative model. Business Process Management Journal, 19(2), 364-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151311308358
  54. Singh, S. K., Salim, M. M., Cho, M., Cha, J., Pan, Y., & Park, J. H. (2019). Smart contract-based pool hopping attack prevention for blockchain networks. Symmetry, 11(7), 941. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11070941
  55. Slade, E. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Piercy, N. C., & Williams, M. D. (2015). Modeling consumers' adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 860-873. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20823
  56. Smyth, P. (2009). Cloud computing, a strategy guide for board level executives. Kynetix Technology Group Report.
  57. Swaminathan, M. S. (1999, October). Genetic engineering and food security: Ecological and livelihood issues. In Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor: Proceedings of an International Conference, Washington, DC, 21-22.
  58. Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  59. Tashkandi, A. N., & Al-Jabri, I. M. (2015). Cloud computing adoption by higher education institutions in Saudi Arabia: An exploratory study. Cluster Computing, 18(4), 1527-1537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-015-0490-4
  60. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(94)00019-K
  61. Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
  62. Van de Weerd, I., Mangula, I. S., & Brinkkemper, S. (2016). Adoption of software as a service in Indonesia: Examining the influence of organizational factors. Information & Management, 53(7), 915-928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.05.008
  63. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  64. Wong, L. W., Leong, L. Y., Hew, J. J., Tan, G. W. H., & Ooi, K. B. (2020). Time to seize the digital evolution: Adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 101997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.005
  65. Yang, C. S. (2019). Maritime shipping digitalization: Blockchain-based technology applications, future improvements, and intention to use. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 131, 108-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.09.020
  66. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446
  67. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International Journal of Web and Grid Services, 14(4), 352-375. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwgs.2018.10016848