Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제22권11호
  • /
  • Pages.1749-1763
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Artery Disease: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence and Recent Developments

  • Chun-Ho Yun (Department of Radiology, MacKay Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Chung-Lieh Hung (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Ming-Shien Wen (Department of Cardiology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University) ;
  • Yung-Liang Wan (Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University) ;
  • Aaron So (Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, Imaging Program, Lawson Health Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2020.10.23
  • 심사 : 2021.05.15
  • 발행 : 2021.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is routinely used for anatomical assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, invasive measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant CAD. CT-derived FFRCT and CT perfusion are two emerging techniques that can provide a functional assessment of CAD for risk stratification and clinical decision making. Several clinical studies have shown that the diagnostic performance of concomitant CCTA and functional CT assessment for detecting hemodynamically significant CAD is at least non-inferior to that of other routinely used imaging modalities. This article aims to review the current clinical evidence and recent developments in functional CT techniques.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135-2144  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058
  2. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1724-1732  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031
  3. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Leber A, Johnson T, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:111-117  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1697
  4. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2324-2336  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806576
  5. Smith SC Jr, Feldman TE, Hirshfeld JW Jr, Jacobs AK, Kern MJ, King SB 3rd, et al. ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 2006;113:e166-e286  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.170815
  6. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertus JA. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 appropriateness criteria for coronary revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:530-553  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.005
  7. Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ, Grantham JA, Maddox TM, Maron DJ, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2016 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes : a report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:439-463  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-0780-8
  8. Neumann FJ, Hochholzer W, Siepe M. ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization 2018 : the most important innovations. Herz 2018;43:689-694  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-018-4764-5
  9. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek J, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1703-1708  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199606273342604
  10. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-224  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0807611
  11. Pijls NH, Tanaka N, Fearon WF. Functional assessment of coronary stenoses: can we live without it? Eur Heart J 2013;34:1335-1344  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs436
  12. Plein S, Motwani M. Fractional flow reserve as the reference standard for myocardial perfusion studies: fool's gold? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;14:1211-1213  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet110
  13. Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, O'Brien SM, Boden WE, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1395-1407  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915922
  14. Wintermark M, Albers GW, Alexandrov AV, Alger JR, Bammer R, Baron JC, et al. Acute stroke imaging research roadmap. Stroke 2008;39:1621-1628  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512319
  15. Mushtaq S, Conte E, Pontone G, Baggiano A, Annoni A, Formenti A, et al. State-of-the-art-myocardial perfusion stress testing: static CT perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2020;14:294-302  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2019.09.002
  16. Seitun S, Castiglione Morelli M, Budaj I, Boccalini S, Galletto Pregliasco A, Valbusa A, et al. Stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: a new topic in cardiology. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2016;69:188-200  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2015.10.021
  17. Sorgaard MH, Linde JJ, Kuhl JT, Kelbaek H, Hove JD, Fornitz GG, et al. Value of myocardial perfusion assessment with coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:1611-1621  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.022
  18. Kurata A, Mochizuki T, Koyama Y, Haraikawa T, Suzuki J, Shigematsu Y, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 2005;69:550-557  https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.69.550
  19. Bischoff B, Bamberg F, Marcus R, Schwarz F, Becker HC, Becker A, et al. Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:435-442  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0080-y
  20. George RT, Silva C, Cordeiro MA, DiPaula A, Thompson DR, McCarthy WF, et al. Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:153-160  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.014
  21. Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Bezerra HG, Okada DR, Rogers IS, et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010;254:410-419  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09091014
  22. Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, Miller JM, et al. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J 2014;35:1120-1130  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht488
  23. George RT, Mehra VC, Chen MY, Kitagawa K, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM, et al. Myocardial CT perfusion imaging and SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a head-to-head comparison from the CORE320 multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology 2014;272:407-416  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140806
  24. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, Meredith IT, Leong DP, Antonis PR, et al. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:1097-1111  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.004
  25. Takx RA, Blomberg BA, El Aidi H, Habets J, de Jong PA, Nagel E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:e002666 
  26. Pontone G, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Baggiano A, Fazzari F, Guglielmo M, et al. Incremental diagnostic value of stress computed tomography myocardial perfusion with whole-heart coverage CT scanner in intermediate-to high-risk symptomatic patients suspected of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:338-349  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.025
  27. Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leong DP, Leung MC, Malaiapan Y, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of combined assessment using adenosine stress computed tomography perfusion + computed tomography angiography with transluminal attenuation gradient + computed tomography angiography against invasive fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1904-1912  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.557
  28. Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, Leipsic J, Raju R, Naoum C, et al. Comparison of coronary CT angiography, SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease determined by fractional flow reserve. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:1100-1107  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2471
  29. Vliegenthart R, Pelgrim GJ, Ebersberger U, Rowe GW, Oudkerk M, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT of the heart. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:S54-S63  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9208
  30. Cademartiri F, Seitun S, Clemente A, La Grutta L, Toia P, Runza G, et al. Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2017;7:129-150  https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.03.22
  31. Carrascosa PM, Cury RC, Deviggiano A, Capunay C, Campisi R, Lopez de Munain M, et al. Comparison of myocardial perfusion evaluation with single versus dual-energy CT and effect of beam-hardening artifacts. Acad Radiol 2015;22:591-599  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.019
  32. Pelgrim GJ, van Hamersvelt RW, Willemink MJ, Schmidt BT, Flohr T, Schilham A, et al. Accuracy of iodine quantification using dual energy CT in latest generation dual source and dual layer CT. Eur Radiol 2017;27:3904-3912  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4752-9
  33. Delgado Sanchez-Gracian C, Oca Pernas R, Trinidad Lopez C, Santos Armentia E, Vaamonde Liste A, Vazquez Caamano M, et al. Quantitative myocardial perfusion with stress dual-energy CT: iodine concentration differences between normal and ischemic or necrotic myocardium. Initial experience. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3199-3207  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4128-y
  34. Nagao M, Matsuoka H, Kawakami H, Higashino H, Mochizuki T, Uemura M, et al. Myocardial ischemia in acute coronary syndrome: assessment using 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:1097-1106  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1965
  35. Rossi A, Dharampal A, Wragg A, Davies LC, van Geuns RJ, Anagnostopoulos C, et al. Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions? Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:85-94  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet133
  36. Conte E, Sonck J, Mushtaq S, Collet C, Mizukami T, Barbato E, et al. FFRCT and CT perfusion: a review on the evaluation of functional impact of coronary artery stenosis by cardiac CT. Int J Cardiol 2020;300:289-296  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.08.018
  37. Lubbers M, Coenen A, Kofflard M, Bruning T, Kietselaer B, Galema T, et al. Comprehensive cardiac CT with myocardial perfusion imaging versus functional testing in suspected coronary artery disease: the multicenter, randomized CRESCENT-II trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:1625-1636  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.010
  38. Bamberg F, Hinkel R, Schwarz F, Sandner TA, Baloch E, Marcus R, et al. Accuracy of dynamic computed tomography adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging in estimating myocardial blood flow at various degrees of coronary artery stenosis using a porcine animal model. Invest Radiol 2012;47:71-77  https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31823fd42b
  39. George RT, Jerosch-Herold M, Silva C, Kitagawa K, Bluemke DA, Lima JA, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2007;42:815-822  https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e318124a884
  40. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, Marcus RP, Greif M, von Ziegler F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011;260:689-698  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110638
  41. Huber AM, Leber V, Gramer BM, Muenzel D, Leber A, Rieber J, et al. Myocardium: dynamic versus single-shot CT perfusion imaging. Radiology 2013;269:378-386  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121441
  42. Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, et al. Dynamic stress computed tomography perfusion with a whole-heart coverage scanner in addition to coronary computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve computed tomography derived. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:2460-2471  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.02.015
  43. Li Y, Dai X, Lu Z, Shen C, Zhang J. Diagnostic performance of quantitative, semi-quantitative, and visual analysis of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: a validation study with invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur Radiol 2021;31:525-534  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07145-5
  44. Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous evaluation of coronary arteries and myocardial perfusion with single stress cardiac computed tomography acquisition compared to invasive coronary angiography plus invasive fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 2018;273:263-268  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.065
  45. Li Y, Yu M, Dai X, Lu Z, Shen C, Wang Y, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis: CT myocardial perfusion versus machine learning CT fractional flow reserve. Radiology 2019;293:305-314  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019190098
  46. Fahmi R, Eck BL, Levi J, Fares A, Wu H, Vembar M, et al. Effect of beam hardening on transmural myocardial perfusion quantification in myocardial CT imaging. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2016;9788:97882I 
  47. Yi Y, Xu C, Wu W, Shen ZJ, Lee W, Yun CH, et al. Low-dose CT perfusion with combined use of CTP and CTP-derived coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp: validation with invasive fractional flow reserve. Eur Radiol 2020;31:1119-1129  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07096-x
  48. Min JK, Taylor CA, Achenbach S, Koo BK, Leipsic J, Norgaard BL, et al. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: clinical data and scientific principles. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:1209-1222  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.006
  49. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1989-1997  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.066
  50. Coenen A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, Kono A, Dedic A, Chelu RG, et al. Fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive CT angiography data: diagnostic performance of an on-site clinician-operated computational fluid dynamics algorithm. Radiology 2015;274:674-683  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140992
  51. Tang CX, Liu CY, Lu MJ, Schoepf UJ, Tesche C, Bayer RR 2nd, et al. CT FFR for ischemia-specific CAD with a new computational fluid dynamics algorithm: a Chinese multicenter study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:980-990  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.018
  52. Qiao HY, Li JH, Schoepf UJ, Bayer RR, Tinnefeld FC, Di Jiang M, et al. Prognostic implication of CT-FFR based functional SYNTAX score in patients with de novo three-vessel disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020 Nov [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa256 
  53. Kim SH, Kang SH, Chung WY, Yoon CH, Park SD, Nam CW, et al. Validation of the diagnostic performance of 'HeartMedi V.1.0', a novel CT-derived fractional flow reserve measurement, for patients with coronary artery disease: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2020;10:e037780 
  54. Wang ZQ, Zhou YJ, Zhao YX, Shi DM, Liu YY, Liu W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a deep learning approach to calculate FFR from coronary CT angiography. J Geriatr Cardiol 2019;16:42-48 
  55. Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Gaur S, Seneviratne S, Ko BS, Ito H, et al. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: next steps). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1145-1155  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.043
  56. Cook CM, Petraco R, Shun-Shin MJ, Ahmad Y, Nijjer S, Al-Lamee R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review. JAMA Cardiol 2017;2:803-810  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1314
  57. Fairbairn TA, Nieman K, Akasaka T, Norgaard BL, Berman DS, Raff G, et al. Real-world clinical utility and impact on clinical decision-making of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: lessons from the ADVANCE Registry. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3701-3711  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy530
  58. Fujimoto S, Kawasaki T, Kumamaru KK, Kawaguchi Y, Dohi T, Okonogi T, et al. Diagnostic performance of on-site computed CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid structure interactions: comparison with invasive fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;20:343-352  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey104
  59. Siogkas PK, Anagnostopoulos CD, Liga R, Exarchos TP, Sakellarios AI, Rigas G, et al. Noninvasive CT-based hemodynamic assessment of coronary lesions derived from fast computational analysis: a comparison against fractional flow reserve. Eur Radiol 2019;29:2117-2126  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5781-8
  60. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012;308:1237-1245  https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.11274
  61. Norgaard BL, Gaur S, Leipsic J, Ito H, Miyoshi T, Park SJ, et al. Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic performance of CT angiography derived FFR in coronary artery disease: a substudy of the NXT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;8:1045-1055  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.003
  62. Tesche C, Otani K, De Cecco CN, Coenen A, De Geer J, Kruk M, et al. Influence of coronary calcium on diagnostic performance of machine learning CT-FFR: results from MACHINE registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;13:760-770  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.06.027
  63. Di Jiang M, Zhang XL, Liu H, Tang CX, Li JH, Wang YN, et al. The effect of coronary calcification on diagnostic performance of machine learning-based CT-FFR: a Chinese multicenter study. Eur Radiol 2021;31:1482-1493  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07261-2
  64. Pontone G, Baggiano A, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Muscogiuri G, et al. Stress computed tomography perfusion versus fractional flow reserve CT derived in suspected coronary artery disease: the PERFECTION study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:1487-1497  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.023
  65. Nakazato R, Park HB, Berman DS, Gransar H, Koo BK, Erglis A, et al. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the DeFACTO study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:881-889  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000297
  66. Min JK, Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, et al. Usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms for intermediate stenoses confirmed by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:971-976  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.05.033
  67. Donnelly PM, Kolossvary M, Karady J, Ball PA, Kelly S, Fitzsimons D, et al. Experience with an on-site coronary computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve algorithm for the assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2018;121:9-13  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.018
  68. Nakamura S, Kitagawa K, Goto Y, Omori T, Kurita T, Yamada A, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantified with stress dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:1379-1387  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.05.021
  69. Chen MY, Rochitte CE, Arbab-Zadeh A, Dewey M, George RT, Miller JM, et al. Prognostic value of combined CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging versus invasive coronary angiography and nuclear stress perfusion imaging in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events: the CORE320 multicenter study. Radiology 2017;284:55-65  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161565
  70. Douglas PS, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, Patel MR, Norgaard BL, Byrne RA, et al. 1-year outcomes of FFRCT-guided care in patients with suspected coronary disease: the PLATFORM study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:435-445  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.057
  71. Leipsic J, Yang TH, Thompson A, Koo BK, Mancini GB, Taylor C, et al. CT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic CTA (DeFACTO) study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:989-994  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11441
  72. Ri K, Kumamaru KK, Fujimoto S, Kawaguchi Y, Dohi T, Yamada S, et al. Noninvasive computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve based on structural and fluid analysis: reproducibility of on-site determination by unexperienced observers. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018;42:256-262  https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000679
  73. Tesche C, De Cecco CN, Baumann S, Renker M, McLaurin TW, Duguay TM, et al. Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: machine learning algorithm versus computational fluid dynamics modeling. Radiology 2018;288:64-72  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171291
  74. Zreik M, Lessmann N, van Hamersvelt RW, Wolterink JM, Voskuil M, Viergever MA, et al. Deep learning analysis of the myocardium in coronary CT angiography for identification of patients with functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Med Image Anal 2018;44:72-85  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.11.008
  75. Kumamaru KK, Fujimoto S, Otsuka Y, Kawasaki T, Kawaguchi Y, Kato E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D deep-learning-based fully automated estimation of patient-level minimum fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2020;21:437-445  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez160
  76. Agostini D, Roule V, Nganoa C, Roth N, Baavour R, Parienti JJ, et al. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with 15O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018;45:1079-1090  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3958-7
  77. Pontone G, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Muscogiuri G, et al. Quantitative vs. qualitative evaluation of static stress computed tomography perfusion to detect haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:1244-1252  https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jey111
  78. Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Ferreira N, Sampaio F, Pires-Morais G, et al. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:1099-107  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.020
  79. Coenen A, Rossi A, Lubbers MM, Kurata A, Kono AK, Chelu RG, et al. Integrating CT myocardial perfusion and CT-FFR in the work-up of coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:760-770  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.028
  80. Rossi A, Wragg A, Klotz E, Pirro F, Moon JC, Nieman K, et al. Dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: comparison of clinical analysis methods for the detection of vessel-specific ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:e005505 
  81. Kono AK, Coenen A, Lubbers M, Kurata A, Rossi A, Dharampal A, et al. Relative myocardial blood flow by dynamic computed tomographic perfusion imaging predicts hemodynamic significance of coronary stenosis better than absolute blood flow. Invest Radiol 2014;49:801-807  https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000087
  82. Greif M, von Ziegler F, Bamberg F, Tittus J, Schwarz F, D'Anastasi M, et al. CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR. Heart 2013;99:1004-1011  https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-303794
  83. Coenen A, Kim YH, Kruk M, Tesche C, De Geer J, Kurata A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a machine-learning approach to coronary computed tomographic angiography-based fractional flow reserve: result from the MACHINE consortium. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:e007217 
  84. Ko BS, Cameron JD, Munnur RK, Wong DTL, Fujisawa Y, Sakaguchi T, et al. Noninvasive CT-derived FFR based on structural and fluid analysis: a comparison with invasive FFR for detection of functionally significant stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:663-673  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.07.005
  85. Chung JH, Lee KE, Nam CW, Doh JH, Kim HI, Kwon SS, et al. Diagnostic performance of a novel method for fractional flow reserve computed from noninvasive computed tomography angiography (NOVEL-FLOW Study). Am J Cardiol 2017;120:362-368  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.057
  86. Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, De Winter O, Wyffels E, Bartunek J, et al. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:307-314 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2009.12.010