Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Smartphone Applications/System Design Plan for Class Activation

수업 활성화를 위한 스마트폰 앱·시스템 설계 방안

  • Lim, Kyung-Hee (Department of Computer Education, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Mi Ryang (Department of Computer Education, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 임경희 (성균관대학교 컴퓨터교육과) ;
  • 김미량 (성균관대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2021.03.05
  • Accepted : 2021.06.20
  • Published : 2021.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, a smartphone utilization system was designed to explore ways to use smartphones owned by more than 95% of Korean teenagers in school classes. First, the necessary functions were selected based on the factors related to adolescents and the factors of distraction, dependence, motivation, and cooperation in the preceding studies on the use of smartphone classes, and then three versions of the application were composed according to the educational roles of students, teachers, and parents. By using these applications, students can learn self-study, motivate learning, and actively interact, teachers can be more closely with students and facilitate lessons while giving detailed feedback, and parents can check the student's safe learning using smartphones. It is hoped that this measure will help to increase the educational effect by activating the use of smartphones in school classes.

본 연구에서는 우리나라 95%이상의 청소년들이 소유하고 있는 스마트폰을 학교 수업에 활용하는 방안을 탐색하고자 스마트폰 활용 시스템을 설계하였다. 먼저 청소년 관련 요인과 스마트폰 수업 활용의 선행연구에 나타난 주의산만, 의존도, 동기부여, 협동심 고취 요인을 기반으로 필요 기능을 선정한 후에 학생, 교사, 부모의 교육적 역할에 따라 세 버전의 앱을 설계하였다. 이 앱을 이용함으로써 학생은 자율학습, 학습동기 부여, 활발한 상호작용이 가능하고 교사는 학생들과 더욱 밀착하여 세밀한 피드백을 하면서 수업의 질을 개선해 나갈 수 있으며 부모는 학생의 안전한 스마트폰 사용 학습을 확인할 수 있다. 이 방안으로 학교 수업에서 스마트폰 사용이 활성화되어 교육 효과를 높이는 데 도움이 될 수 있기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Silver, L. (2019). Smartphone Ownership Is Growing Rapidly Around the World, but Not Always Equally. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/02/05/smartphone-ownership-is-growing-rapidly-around-the-world-but-not-always-equally/
  2. Kim, Y. W. (2019). Analysis of mobile phone ownership and usage behavior of children and adolescents. Korea : KISDI
  3. Grinols1, A. B., & Rajesh1, R. (2014). Multitasking With Smartphones in the College Classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 2014, 77(1), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490613515300
  4. Seifert, T. (2014). pedagogical applications of smartphone integration in teaching - lecturers', students' & pupils' perspectives. International Conference Mobile Learning, 10.
  5. Clayton, K., & Murphy, A. (2016). Smartphone Apps in Education: Students Create Videos to Teach Smartphone Use as Tool for Learning. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 8(2), 99-109.
  6. Kim, M. J. (2020). Human Rights Commission, "A total ban on smartphones in middle and high schools is a violation of human rights". Retrieved from https://news.joins.com
  7. Ma, S., Steger, D. G., Doolittle, P. E., Lee, A. H., Griffin, L. E., & Amanda Stewart Virginia Tech. (2020). Persistence of Multitasking Distraction Following the Use of Smartphone-based Clickers. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(11-1), 64-72.
  8. Nazime, T. (2016). Smartphones As Tools For Distance Education. Journal Of Educational And Instructional Studies.
  9. Youn, S. Y. (2015). Connecting through smartphones: Cognitive, social, emotional motivations, and the experience of value perceptions. For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
  10. Ministry of Education. (2020). Press Release: The largest scale ever, the school's wireless network (Wi-fi) construction project in earnest. Korea : Ministry of Education.
  11. So, W. H., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Effects of Characteristics of Smart Learning on Korean Students' Learning Attitude and Achievement: Focusing on Mobility, Interactivity, Immediacy, Reality, Cooperation. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 9(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.35873/ajmahs.2019.9.9.019
  12. Ha, M. J. (2019). The Effects of Smart Classroom Learning on the Academic Achievement of College Students, 9(6), 261-270.
  13. NIA. (2019). The survey on smartphone overdependence. Korea : NIA
  14. Ryu, C. R. (2006). Youth's Use of Media and Human Relationships. National Youth Policy Institute Research Report, 1-158.
  15. Park, K. H. (2016). A Study on the Aspects of Youth Culture in Adolescent Novels : Focused on the Peer.Leisure Culture, 7(5), 1143-1165. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.7.6.66
  16. Cha, D. H., & Ok, S. W. (2014). The Effects of Adolescents' Leisure and Cultural Activities on Self-regulation, Academic Achievements, and Self-esteem: Focusing on Fathers' Educational Levels. Health and Social Welfare Review, 34(1), 353-378. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2014.34.1.353
  17. Ministry of Education. (2015). 2015 revised curriculum overview. Korea : Ministry of Education
  18. Mavhunga, Kibirige, Chigonga & Ramaboka. (2016). Smartphones in public secondary schools: Views of matric graduates. Perspectives in Education, 34(3), 72-85
  19. Muhammad, A., Mohammad, N. A., Shahrill, S. M., Danang, K. W., & Miftachul, H. (2017). Smartphones usage in the classrooms: Learning aid or interference?. Educ Inf Technol, 22, 3063-3079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9572-7
  20. Yaron, A., & Vered, E. M. (2019). Learning in the smartphone era: Viewpoints and perceptions on both sides of the lectern. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2329-2340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09871-w
  21. Stanley, S. M., & Ymele-Leki, P. (2017). Introducing high school students to chemical engineering kinetics with a simple experiment-based smartphone education application. ChE Division of ASEE, 51(4).
  22. Seifert, T. (2014). Pedagogical applications of smartphone integration in teaching - lecturers', students' & pupils' perspectives. International Conference Mobile Learning, 10.
  23. Moh., C. (2015). Students' acceptance of using smartphone in a mobile learning context. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR
  24. Matyokurehwa, K., Rudhumbu, N., & Mlambo, C. P. (2020). Intentions of First Year University Business Students to use Smartphones as learning tools in Botswana: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology.
  25. Mauricio, M. C., & Genuino, C. F. (2020). Writing Performance and Attitude of ESL Learners Engaged in Smartphone Assisted Collaborative Activity. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(2).
  26. National Youth Policy Institure. (2020). Korea: KCYPS 2018
  27. Park, Y. S., & Kim, U. C. (2001). Psychological, behaviorial and relational characteristics of school violence : Comparative analysis of victims, bullies, non - participants of aggression. The Korean Psychological Association, 2001(5), 63-89.
  28. Ryu., C. H. (2007). Interpersonal Communication Media for Youth: The Difference Between Self-Exposure and Communication Media. Speech & Communication, 7, 179-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6393(88)90038-6
  29. Woo, C. H., Park, A. C., & Jeong, H. H. (2010). The Structural Relationship among Human Relations, Stress, Depression and Suicidal Ideation of Adolescents by genders and Level of school. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 24(1), 19-38.
  30. Park, Y. S, & Kim, U. I. (2008). The quality of Life and interpersonal relationships among Korean adolescents. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology. 22(4), 801-836.
  31. Choi, S. R., Choi, J. M., & Seo, S. B. (2017). An Analysis on the Relationship between Game and Happiness. Journal of Korea Game Society, 17(2), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2017.17.2.107
  32. Gim., H. Y., & Ryu, S. H. (2019). A Study on Adolescents and Games from the Viewpoint of Interaction Ritual, The Korean Association for Sociology of Culture, 17(1), 77-157.
  33. Robert, M., & Gagne. (1998). The Conditions of Learing and Theory of Instruction. Seoul : Hakjisa
  34. https://developer.android.com
  35. https://developer.apple.com/
  36. National IT Industry Promotion Agency. (2019). Software Technology Evaluation Criteria Application Guide, 21-31.