Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

International Research Trends Related to Inquiry in Science Education: Perception and Perspective on Inquiry, Support and Strategy for Inquiry, and Teacher Professional Development for Inquiry

과학교육에서 탐구 관련 국외 연구 동향 -탐구의 인식과 관점, 전략과 지원, 교사 전문성의 관점에서-

  • Yu, Eun-Jeong (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation) ;
  • Byun, Taejin (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation) ;
  • Baek, Jongho (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation) ;
  • Shim, Hyeon-Pyo (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation) ;
  • Ryu, Kumbok (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation) ;
  • Lee, Dongwon (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
  • Received : 2021.01.13
  • Accepted : 2021.02.15
  • Published : 2021.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Inquiry occupies an important place in science education, and research related to inquiry is widely conducted. However, due to the inclusiveness of the concept of "exploration," each researcher perceives its meaning differently, and approaches may vary. In addition, criticisms have been raised that the results of classes using inquiry in science education do not guarantee meaningful changes to students. Therefore, this study attempts to identify the trend of SSCI-level research papers dealing with inquiry in science education over the past three years to confirm the current status and effectiveness of the inquiry. Researches used in the analysis are International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Research in Science Education, and Science Education, and limited to those that directly suggest "inquiry (enquiry)" as a keyword. Based on extracted 75 papers, the classification process was conducted, and an analysis frame was derived inductively by reflecting the subject and characteristics. Specific cases for each category were presented by dividing into three aspects: perception and perspective on inquiry, support and strategy for inquiry, and teacher professional development for inquiry. The results of examining the implications for scientific inquiry are as follows: First, rather than defining inquiry as an implicit proposition or presenting it as a step-by-step procedure, it was induced to grasp the meaning of inquiry more comprehensively and holistically. Second, as to whether the inquiry-based instruction is effective in all aspects of the cognitive, functional, and affective domains of science, the limitations are clearly presented, and the context-dependent and subject-specific properties and limitations of inquiry are emphasized. Third, uncertainty in science inquiry-based instruction can help learners to begin their inquiry and develop interest, but in the process of recognizing data and restructuring knowledge, explicit and specific guidance and scaffolding should be provided at an appropriate timing.

과학교육에서 탐구는 중요한 위치를 차지하고 있으며, 탐구와 관련된 연구가 폭넓게 이루어지고 있다. 그러나 '탐구'라는 개념의 포괄성으로 인해 연구자마다 그 의미를 다르게 인식하고 있으며 접근 방법도 다양하다. 또한 과학교육에서 탐구를 활용한 수업의 성과가 실제학생들에게 유의미한 변화를 보장하는 것은 아니라는 비판이 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 과학교육에서 최근 3년간 탐구를 주제로 한 SSCI급 연구 논문의 동향을 살펴봄으로써 탐구와 관련된 연구내용을 탐색하고 추후 연구에 필요한 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 분석에 활용된 연구물은 International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Research in Science Education, Science Education이며, 핵심 주제어에 "inquiry(enquiry)"를 직접적으로 제시하고 있는 연구물로 한정하였다. 추출된 논문 75편을 토대로 유목화 과정이 이루어졌고, 주제와 특징을 반영하여 귀납적으로 분석틀을 도출하였다. 탐구에 대한 인식 및 관점, 탐구 학습을 위한 전략 및 지원, 탐구 기반 수업을 위한 교사 전문성 발달의 세 가지 측면으로 나누어 각 범주별 구체적인 사례를 제시하였다. 과학 탐구에 대한 시사점을 살펴본 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 탐구를 함축적 명제로 정의하거나 몇 개의 단계적 절차로 제시하기보다는 탐구의 의미를 보다 종합적이고 총체적으로 파악하도록 유도하고 있었다. 둘째, 탐구 기반의 수업이 과학의 인지적, 기능적, 정의적 영역의 모든 측면에서 효과적인가에 대해서는 그 한계를 명확히 제시하고, 맥락 의존적이고 교과 특이적인 탐구의 속성과 한계를 파악할 것을 강조하였다. 셋째, 과학 탐구 기반 수업에서 불확실성은 학습자가 탐구를 시작하고 관심을 갖도록 하는 데에는 도움이 될 수 있으나, 자료를 인지하여 지식을 재구성하는 과정에서는 명시적이고 구체적인 안내와 비계가 적절한 타이밍에 이루어져야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adler, I., Schwartz, L., Madjar, N., & Zion, M. (2018). Reading between the lines: The effect of contextual factors on student motivation throughout an open inquiry process. Science Education, 102(4), 820-855. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21445
  2. Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019a). Teaching practices linked to the implementation of inquiry-based practical work in certain science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 64-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21469
  3. Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019b). A systematic review characterizing and clarifying intrinsic teaching challenges linked to inquiry-based practical work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 619-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21516
  4. Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019c). Characterising extrinsic challenges linked to the design and implementation of inquiry-based practical work. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1677-1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9671-x
  5. Arsal, Z. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1326-1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1329564
  6. Azevedo, F. S. (2018). An inquiry into the structure of situational interests. Science Education, 102(1), 108-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21319
  7. Balgopal, M. M., Casper, A. M. A., Atadero, R. A., & Rambo-Hernandez, K. E. (2017). Responses to different types of inquiry prompts: college students' discourse, performance, and perceptions of group work in an engineering class. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1625-1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1346847
  8. Battaglia, O. R., Di Paola, B., Persano Adorno, D., Pizzolato, N., & Fazio, C. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of modelling-oriented workshops for engineering undergraduates in the field of thermally activated phenomena. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1395- 1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9660-0
  9. Bevins, S., Price, G., & Booth, J. (2019). The I files, the truth is out there: science teachers' constructs of inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1568605
  10. Biggers, M. (2018). Questioning Questions: Elementary Teachers' Adaptations of Investigation Questions Across the Inquiry Continuum. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9556-4
  11. Brown, J. C. (2017). A metasynthesis of the complementarity of culturally responsive and inquiry-based science education in K-12 settings: Implications for advancing equitable science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1143-1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21401
  12. Bruckermann, T., Aschermann, E., Bresges, A., & Schluter, K. (2017). Metacognitive and multimedia support of experiments in inquiry learning for science teacher preparation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 701-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1301691
  13. Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113-2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1660927
  14. Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
  15. Cetin, P. S., Eymur, G., Southerland, S. A., Walker, J., & Whittington, K. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of engagement in a broad range of disciplinary practices on learning of Turkish high-school chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1432914
  16. Chen, J., Wang, M., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2018). Using a three-dimensional thinking graph to support inquiry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1239-1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21450
  17. Chi, S. H., Wang, Z., & Liu, X. (2019). Investigating disciplinary context effect on student scientific inquiry competence. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2736-2764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1697837
  18. Chi, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Won Han, S. (2018). Moderation of the effects of scientific inquiry activities on low SES students' PISA 2015 science achievement by school teacher support and disciplinary climate in science classroom across gender. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1284-1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1476742
  19. Crujeiras-Perez, B., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2019). Students' progression in monitoring anomalous results obtained in inquiry-based laboratory tasks. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 243-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9641-3
  20. Cruz-Guzman, M., Garcia-Carmona, A., & Criado, A. M. (2017). An analysis of the questions proposed by elementary pre-service teachers when designing experimental activities as inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1755-1774. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1351649
  21. Davis, J. P., & Bellocchi, A. (2018). Objectivity, subjectivity, and emotion in school science inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1419-1447. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21461
  22. Doria, Y. J., Zohar, A., Fischer-Shachor, D., Kohan-Mass, J., & Carmi, M. (2018). Gender-fair assessment of young gifted students' scientific thinking skills. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 595-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1431419
  23. Duncan Seraphin, K., Harrison, G. M., Philippoff, J., Brandon, P. R., Nguyen, T. T. T., Lawton, B. E., & Vallin, L. M. (2017). Teaching aquatic science as inquiry through professional development: Teacher characteristics and student outcomes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1219-1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21403
  24. Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5
  25. Fuhrmann, T., Schneider, B., & Blikstein, P. (2018). Should students design or interact with models? Using the bifocal modelling framework to investigate model construction in high school science. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 867-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1453175
  26. Garcia-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzman, M. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers' skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 989-1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9536-8
  27. Gray, R., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2018). Talking modelling: examining secondary science teachers' modelling-related talk during a modelbased inquiry unit. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1345-1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1479547
  28. Herranen, J., Kousa, P., Fooladi, E., & Aksela, M. (2019). Inquiry as a context-based practice - a case study of pre-service teachers' beliefs and implementation of inquiry in context-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1977-1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1655679
  29. Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2017). An exploration of students' science learning interest related to their cognitive anxiety, cognitive load, self-confidence and learning progress using inquiry-based learning with an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193-1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9541-y
  30. Jaber, L. Z., Dini, V., Hammer, D., & Danahy, E. (2018). Targeting disciplinary practices in an online learning environment. Science Education, 102(4), 668-692. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21340
  31. Jang, J. Y, & Hand, B. (2017). Examining the value of a scaffolded critique framework to promote argumentative and explanatory writings within an argument-based inquiry approach. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1213-1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9542-x
  32. Kang, & Keinonen, T. (2017). The effect of inquiry-based learning experiences on adolescents' science-related career aspiration in the Finnish context. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1669-1689. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1350790
  33. Karvankova, P., & Popjakova, D. (2018). How to link geography, cross-curricular approach and inquiry in science education at the primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 707-722. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1442598
  34. Kluge, A. (2019). Learning science with an interactive simulator: negotiating the practice-theory barrier. International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1590881
  35. Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Effects of explicit instruction on the acquisition of students' science inquiry skills in grades 5 and 6 of primary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4), 421-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1428777
  36. Lamsa, J., Hamalainen, R., Koskinen, P., & Viiri, J. (2018). Visualising the temporal aspects of collaborative inquiry-based learning processes in technology-enhanced physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 40(14), 1697-1717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1506594
  37. Le Hebela, F., Tiberghien, A., Montpied, P., & Fontanieu, V. (2019). Teacher prediction of student difficulties while solving a science inquiry task: example of PISA science items. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1517-1540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1615150
  38. Leblebicioglu, G., Abik, N. M., Capkinoglu, E., Metin, D., Dogan, E. E., Cetin, P. S., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Science Camps for Introducing Nature of Scientific Inquiry Through Student Inquiries in Nature: Two Applications with Retention Study. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1231-1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9652-0
  39. Lederman, J., Lederman, N., Bartels, S., Jimenez, J., Akubo, M., Aly, S., Bao, C., Blanquet, E., Blonder, R., Bologna Soares de Andrade, M., Buntting, C., Cakir, M., EL-Deghaidy, H., ElZorkani, A., Gaigher, E., Guo, S., Hakanen, A., Hamed Al-Lal, S., Han-Tosunoglu, C., ... Zhou, Q. (2019). An international collaborative investigation of beginning seventh grade students' understandings of scientific inquiry: Establishing a baseline. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 486-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21512
  40. Lee, H., Longhurst, M., & Campbell, T. (2017). Teacher learning in technology professional development and its impact on student achievement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1282-1303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1327733
  41. Lehtinen, A., Lehesvuori, S., & Viiri, J. (2019). The connection between forms of guidance for inquiry-based learning and the communicative approaches applied-a case study in the context of pre-service teachers. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1547-1567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9666-7
  42. Lotter, C. R., & Miller, C. (2017). Improving inquiry teaching through reflection on practice. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 913-942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9533-y
  43. Martin, A., Park, S., & Hand, B. (2019). What happens when a teacher's science belief structure is in disequilibrium? entangled nature of beliefs and practice. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 885-920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9644-0
  44. Merritt, E. G., Chiu, J., Peters-Burton, E., & Bell, R. (2018). Teachers' integration of scientific and engineering practices in primary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1321-1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9604-0
  45. Moon, A., Stanford, C., Cole, R., & Towns, M. (2017). Analysis of inquiry materials to explain complexity of chemical reasoning in physical chemistry students' argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1322-1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21407
  46. Moote, J. (2019). Investigating the longer-term impact of the CREST inquiry-based learning programme on student self-regulated processes and related motivations: Views of students and teachers. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 265-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9621-7
  47. Mupira, P., & Ramnarain, U. (2018). The effect of inquiry-based learning on the achievement goal-orientation of grade 10 physical sciences learners at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(6), 810-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21440
  48. Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Kennedy, C. (2017). Comparing two inquiry professional development interventions in science on primary students' questioning and other inquiry behaviours. Research in Science Education, 47(1).
  49. Peel, A., Zangori, L., Friedrichsen, P., Hayes, E., & Sadler, T. (2019). Students' model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resistance through socio-scientific issues-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1564084
  50. Pongsophon, P., & Herman, B. C. (2017). A theory of planned behaviour-based analysis of TIMSS 2011 to determine factors influencing inquiry teaching practices in high-performing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1304-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1328620
  51. Ruppert, J., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2019). Disentangling the role of domain-specific knowledge in student modeling. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 921-948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9656-9
  52. Ryoo, K., & Bedell, K. (2017). The effects of visualizations on linguistically diverse students' understanding of energy and matter in life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1274-1301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21405
  53. Ryoo, K., & Bedell, K. (2019). Supporting linguistically diverse students' science learning with dynamic visualizations through discourse-rich practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 270-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21519
  54. Samarapungavan, A., Bryan, L., & Wills, J. (2017). Second graders' emerging particle models of matter in the context of learning through model-based inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(8), 988-1023. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21394
  55. Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). How an inquiry-based classroom lesson intervenes in science efficacy, career-orientation and self-determination. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2342-2360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1380332
  56. She, H. C., Lin, H. shyang, & Huang, L. Y. (2019). Reflections on and implications of the programme for international student assessment 2015 (PISA 2015) performance of students in Taiwan: The role of epistemic beliefs about science in scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1309-1340. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21553
  57. Smit, R., Rietz, F., & Kreis, A. (2018). What are the effects of science lesson planning in peers?-analysis of attitudes and knowledge based on an actor-partner interdependence model. Research in Science Education, 48(3), 619-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9581-3
  58. Stender, A., Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., & Hartig, H. (2018). Making inquiry-based science learning visible: the influence of CVS and cognitive skills on content knowledge learning in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1812-1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504346
  59. Tang, N. E., Tsai, C. L., Barrow, L., & Romine, W. (2019). Impacts of enquiry-based science teaching on achievement gap between high-and-low SES students: findings from PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 448-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1555726
  60. Terrazas-Arellanes, F. E., Gallard M, A. J., Strycker, L. A., & Walden, E. D. (2018). Impact of interactive online units on learning science among students with learning disabilities and English learners. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 498-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1432915
  61. Tsybulsky, D., Dodick, J., & Camhi, J. (2018). The effect of field trips to university research labs on israeli high school students' NOS understanding. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1247-1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9601-3
  62. van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H., van Hest, E. G. W. C. M., & Poortman, C. (2017). Primary teachers conducting inquiry projects: effects on attitudes towards teaching science and conducting inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1277280
  63. van der Graaf, J., van de Sande, E., Gijsel, M., & Segers, E. (2019). A combined approach to strengthen children's scientific thinking: direct instruction on scientific reasoning and training of teacher's verbal support. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1119-1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1594442
  64. van Riesen, S. A. N., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327-1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263
  65. van Schijndel, T. J. P., Jansen, B. R. J., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2018). Do individual differences in children's curiosity relate to their inquiry-based learning? International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 996-1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460772
  66. van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education: scaffolding pupils' self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461-2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1388940
  67. Villanueva, M. G., Hand, B., Shelley, M., & Therrian, W. (2019). The conceptualization and development of the practical epistemology in science survey(SPSS). Research in Science Education, 49(3), 635-655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9629-z
  68. Vorholzer, A., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2019). Guidance in inquiry-based instruction-an attempt to disentangle a manifold construct. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1562-1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1616124
  69. Wagh, A., Cook-Whitt, K., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Bridging inquiry-based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 615-641. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21379
  70. Walan, S., & Mc Ewen, B. (2017). Primary teachers' reflections on inquiryand context-based science education. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9507-5
  71. Watkins, J., Hammer, D., Radoff, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Phillips, A. M. (2018). Positioning as not-understanding: The value of showing uncertainty for engaging in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 573-599. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21431
  72. Williams, R. T., Pringle, R. M., & Kilgore, K. L. (2019). A Practitioner's inquiry into vocabulary building strategies for native spanish speaking ELLs in inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education, 49(4), 989-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9848-6
  73. Wilmes, S. E. D., & Siry, C. (2018). Interaction rituals and inquiry-based science instruction: Analysis of student participation in small-group investigations in a multilingual classroom. Science Education, 102(5), 1107-1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21462
  74. Wu, P. H., Kuo, C. Y., Wu, H. K., Jen, T. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2018). Learning benefits of secondary school students' inquiry-related curiosity: A cross-grade comparison of the relationships among learning experiences, curiosity, engagement, and inquiry abilities. Science Education, 102(5), 917-950. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21456
  75. Zhang, L. (2018). Withholding answers during hands-on scientific investigations? Comparing effects on developing students' scientific knowledge, reasoning, and application. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4), 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1429692
  76. Baek, J., Byun, T., Lee, D., & Shim, H-P. (2020). An investigation on the assessment tool and status of assessment in the 'scientific inquiry experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 515-529. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.5.515
  77. Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9008-5
  78. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: research models and fugitive findings. In R. Wonziak & K. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3-44). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  79. Byun, T. (2017). A literature review on media-based learning in science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.417
  80. Byun, T., Baek, J., Shim, H.-P., & Lee, D. (2019). An investigation on the implementation of the 'scientific inquiry experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 669-679.
  81. Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry PD: alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 291-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
  82. Collette, A. T. & Chiappetta, E. L. (1989). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (2nd ed.). OH: Merill Publishing Company.
  83. Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
  84. Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412293
  85. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A.W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  86. Freese, A. R. (1999). The role of reflection on preservice teachers' development in the context of a professional development school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 895-909 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00029-3
  87. Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Eds.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 159-182). London: Routledge.
  88. Han, S., Choi, S., & Noh, T. (2012) Epistemological views of middle school students on scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.082
  89. Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
  90. Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  91. Hwang, S. (2018). Research trend on the sociocultural approaches to science learning identity for the realization of 'Science Education for All'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.2.187
  92. Jho, H. (2015). A literature review of studies on decision-making in socio-scientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 791-936. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0791
  93. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  94. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J. A., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057
  95. Kwon, N. & Ahn, J. (2012). The analysis on domestic research trends for convergence and integrated science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.265
  96. Lazonder, A., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
  97. Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry- The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21125
  98. Lee, B., Park, B., & Kim, H. (2007). Analyses of the basic inquiry process in korean 3-10 grade science textbooks: Focused on observation and measurement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(5), 421-431.
  99. Lee, E. & Kang, S. (2012). Sub-component extraction of inquiry skills for direct teaching of inquiry skills. Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 32(2), 236-264. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.236
  100. Lee, J. Park, H., Jung, Y. & Noh, J. (2015). Research trends of web-based inquiry learning effectiveness in science education: A review of publications in selected journals from 2000 to 2014. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 187-202. 35(4), 565-572. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0565
  101. McCormack, A. J. (1992). Trends and issues in science curriculum. in P. B. Uhrmacher et al., (Eds.), Science curriculum resource handbook: A practical guide for K-12 science curriculum, NY: Kraus International Publications, 16-41.
  102. Ministry of Education (MOE) (2015). 2015 revised Science National Curriculum. No. 2015-74. Ministry of Education, Sejong, Korea.
  103. National Research Council(NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core idea. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  104. National Research Council. (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  105. Nellist, J. & Nicholl, B. (1987). ASE Science teachers' handbook. London: Hutchinson.
  106. Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., Sormunen, K., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2010). Preservice and inservice teachers' challenges in the planning of practical work in physics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(4), 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9186-z
  107. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes toward science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  108. Paccon, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
  109. Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers' professional development: a theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2012.734725
  110. Sanderson, B. A., & Kratochvil, D. W. (1971). Science-A Process Approach, product development report no. 8. Washington, D.C.: Office of Program Planning and Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 064-066)
  111. Sandoval, W. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence. Science Education, 89, 634-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
  112. Schon, D. (1987). A review of educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  113. Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2008). What scientists say: Scientists' views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701225801
  114. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-31. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
  115. Teacher Professional Growth Consortium. (1994). Modelling teacher professional growth. University of Melbourne, Unpublished working document.
  116. van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2013). Measuring primary teachers' attitudes toward teaching science: Development of the dimensions of attitude toward science (DAS) instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 577-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.755576
  117. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. MA: Harvard University Press.
  118. Welch, W. W. (1981). Inquiry in school science. In N. Harms, & R. Yager, Project synthesis, What research says, Vol. 3 NSTA.