Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2021.41.1.33

International Research Trends Related to Inquiry in Science Education: Perception and Perspective on Inquiry, Support and Strategy for Inquiry, and Teacher Professional Development for Inquiry  

Yu, Eun-Jeong (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Byun, Taejin (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Baek, Jongho (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Shim, Hyeon-Pyo (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Ryu, Kumbok (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Lee, Dongwon (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.41, no.1, 2021 , pp. 33-46 More about this Journal
Abstract
Inquiry occupies an important place in science education, and research related to inquiry is widely conducted. However, due to the inclusiveness of the concept of "exploration," each researcher perceives its meaning differently, and approaches may vary. In addition, criticisms have been raised that the results of classes using inquiry in science education do not guarantee meaningful changes to students. Therefore, this study attempts to identify the trend of SSCI-level research papers dealing with inquiry in science education over the past three years to confirm the current status and effectiveness of the inquiry. Researches used in the analysis are International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Research in Science Education, and Science Education, and limited to those that directly suggest "inquiry (enquiry)" as a keyword. Based on extracted 75 papers, the classification process was conducted, and an analysis frame was derived inductively by reflecting the subject and characteristics. Specific cases for each category were presented by dividing into three aspects: perception and perspective on inquiry, support and strategy for inquiry, and teacher professional development for inquiry. The results of examining the implications for scientific inquiry are as follows: First, rather than defining inquiry as an implicit proposition or presenting it as a step-by-step procedure, it was induced to grasp the meaning of inquiry more comprehensively and holistically. Second, as to whether the inquiry-based instruction is effective in all aspects of the cognitive, functional, and affective domains of science, the limitations are clearly presented, and the context-dependent and subject-specific properties and limitations of inquiry are emphasized. Third, uncertainty in science inquiry-based instruction can help learners to begin their inquiry and develop interest, but in the process of recognizing data and restructuring knowledge, explicit and specific guidance and scaffolding should be provided at an appropriate timing.
Keywords
research trends; inquiry; science education;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Karvankova, P., & Popjakova, D. (2018). How to link geography, cross-curricular approach and inquiry in science education at the primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 707-722.   DOI
2 Kluge, A. (2019). Learning science with an interactive simulator: negotiating the practice-theory barrier. International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 1-25.   DOI
3 Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Effects of explicit instruction on the acquisition of students' science inquiry skills in grades 5 and 6 of primary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4), 421-441.   DOI
4 Le Hebela, F., Tiberghien, A., Montpied, P., & Fontanieu, V. (2019). Teacher prediction of student difficulties while solving a science inquiry task: example of PISA science items. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1517-1540.   DOI
5 Leblebicioglu, G., Abik, N. M., Capkinoglu, E., Metin, D., Dogan, E. E., Cetin, P. S., & Schwartz, R. (2019). Science Camps for Introducing Nature of Scientific Inquiry Through Student Inquiries in Nature: Two Applications with Retention Study. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1231-1255.   DOI
6 Lee, H., Longhurst, M., & Campbell, T. (2017). Teacher learning in technology professional development and its impact on student achievement in science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1282-1303.   DOI
7 Cetin, P. S., Eymur, G., Southerland, S. A., Walker, J., & Whittington, K. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of engagement in a broad range of disciplinary practices on learning of Turkish high-school chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 473-497.   DOI
8 Chen, J., Wang, M., Grotzer, T. A., & Dede, C. (2018). Using a three-dimensional thinking graph to support inquiry learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1239-1263.   DOI
9 Lehtinen, A., Lehesvuori, S., & Viiri, J. (2019). The connection between forms of guidance for inquiry-based learning and the communicative approaches applied-a case study in the context of pre-service teachers. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1547-1567.   DOI
10 Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry PD: alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 291-318.   DOI
11 Lotter, C. R., & Miller, C. (2017). Improving inquiry teaching through reflection on practice. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 913-942.   DOI
12 Collette, A. T. & Chiappetta, E. L. (1989). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (2nd ed.). OH: Merill Publishing Company.
13 Martin, A., Park, S., & Hand, B. (2019). What happens when a teacher's science belief structure is in disequilibrium? entangled nature of beliefs and practice. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 885-920.   DOI
14 Merritt, E. G., Chiu, J., Peters-Burton, E., & Bell, R. (2018). Teachers' integration of scientific and engineering practices in primary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1321-1337.   DOI
15 Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2017). An exploration of students' science learning interest related to their cognitive anxiety, cognitive load, self-confidence and learning progress using inquiry-based learning with an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193-1212.   DOI
16 Chi, S. H., Wang, Z., & Liu, X. (2019). Investigating disciplinary context effect on student scientific inquiry competence. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2736-2764.   DOI
17 Garcia-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzman, M. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers' skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 989-1010.   DOI
18 Gray, R., & Rogan-Klyve, A. (2018). Talking modelling: examining secondary science teachers' modelling-related talk during a modelbased inquiry unit. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1345-1366.   DOI
19 Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019a). Teaching practices linked to the implementation of inquiry-based practical work in certain science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 64-90.   DOI
20 Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019b). A systematic review characterizing and clarifying intrinsic teaching challenges linked to inquiry-based practical work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 619-648.   DOI
21 Pongsophon, P., & Herman, B. C. (2017). A theory of planned behaviour-based analysis of TIMSS 2011 to determine factors influencing inquiry teaching practices in high-performing countries. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1304-1325.   DOI
22 Moote, J. (2019). Investigating the longer-term impact of the CREST inquiry-based learning programme on student self-regulated processes and related motivations: Views of students and teachers. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 265-294.   DOI
23 Mupira, P., & Ramnarain, U. (2018). The effect of inquiry-based learning on the achievement goal-orientation of grade 10 physical sciences learners at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(6), 810-825.   DOI
24 Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Kennedy, C. (2017). Comparing two inquiry professional development interventions in science on primary students' questioning and other inquiry behaviours. Research in Science Education, 47(1).
25 Ruppert, J., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2019). Disentangling the role of domain-specific knowledge in student modeling. Research in Science Education, 49(3), 921-948.   DOI
26 Ryoo, K., & Bedell, K. (2017). The effects of visualizations on linguistically diverse students' understanding of energy and matter in life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1274-1301.   DOI
27 Lee, E. & Kang, S. (2012). Sub-component extraction of inquiry skills for direct teaching of inquiry skills. Journal of the Korea Association for Science Education, 32(2), 236-264.   DOI
28 Azevedo, F. S. (2018). An inquiry into the structure of situational interests. Science Education, 102(1), 108-127.   DOI
29 Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019c). Characterising extrinsic challenges linked to the design and implementation of inquiry-based practical work. Research in Science Education, 49(6), 1677-1706.   DOI
30 Arsal, Z. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning on the critical thinking dispositions of pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1326-1338.   DOI
31 Balgopal, M. M., Casper, A. M. A., Atadero, R. A., & Rambo-Hernandez, K. E. (2017). Responses to different types of inquiry prompts: college students' discourse, performance, and perceptions of group work in an engineering class. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1625-1647.   DOI
32 National Research Council. (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33 Lee, J. Park, H., Jung, Y. & Noh, J. (2015). Research trends of web-based inquiry learning effectiveness in science education: A review of publications in selected journals from 2000 to 2014. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 187-202. 35(4), 565-572.   DOI
34 McCormack, A. J. (1992). Trends and issues in science curriculum. in P. B. Uhrmacher et al., (Eds.), Science curriculum resource handbook: A practical guide for K-12 science curriculum, NY: Kraus International Publications, 16-41.
35 National Research Council(NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core idea. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36 Nellist, J. & Nicholl, B. (1987). ASE Science teachers' handbook. London: Hutchinson.
37 Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., Sormunen, K., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2010). Preservice and inservice teachers' challenges in the planning of practical work in physics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(4), 393-409.   DOI
38 Paccon, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
39 Postholm, M. B. (2012). Teachers' professional development: a theoretical review. Educational Research, 54(4), 405-429.   DOI
40 Bevins, S., Price, G., & Booth, J. (2019). The I files, the truth is out there: science teachers' constructs of inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 533-545.   DOI
41 Biggers, M. (2018). Questioning Questions: Elementary Teachers' Adaptations of Investigation Questions Across the Inquiry Continuum. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 1-28.   DOI
42 Brown, J. C. (2017). A metasynthesis of the complementarity of culturally responsive and inquiry-based science education in K-12 settings: Implications for advancing equitable science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1143-1173.   DOI
43 Bruckermann, T., Aschermann, E., Bresges, A., & Schluter, K. (2017). Metacognitive and multimedia support of experiments in inquiry learning for science teacher preparation. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 701-722.   DOI
44 Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1-23.   DOI
45 She, H. C., Lin, H. shyang, & Huang, L. Y. (2019). Reflections on and implications of the programme for international student assessment 2015 (PISA 2015) performance of students in Taiwan: The role of epistemic beliefs about science in scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1309-1340.   DOI
46 Ryoo, K., & Bedell, K. (2019). Supporting linguistically diverse students' science learning with dynamic visualizations through discourse-rich practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 270-301.   DOI
47 Samarapungavan, A., Bryan, L., & Wills, J. (2017). Second graders' emerging particle models of matter in the context of learning through model-based inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(8), 988-1023.   DOI
48 Schmid, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). How an inquiry-based classroom lesson intervenes in science efficacy, career-orientation and self-determination. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2342-2360.   DOI
49 Smit, R., Rietz, F., & Kreis, A. (2018). What are the effects of science lesson planning in peers?-analysis of attitudes and knowledge based on an actor-partner interdependence model. Research in Science Education, 48(3), 619-636.   DOI
50 Terrazas-Arellanes, F. E., Gallard M, A. J., Strycker, L. A., & Walden, E. D. (2018). Impact of interactive online units on learning science among students with learning disabilities and English learners. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 498-518.   DOI
51 Han, S., Choi, S., & Noh, T. (2012) Epistemological views of middle school students on scientific inquiry. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 82-94.   DOI
52 Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A.W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
53 Freese, A. R. (1999). The role of reflection on preservice teachers' development in the context of a professional development school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 895-909   DOI
54 Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Eds.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 159-182). London: Routledge.
55 Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
56 Hwang, S. (2018). Research trend on the sociocultural approaches to science learning identity for the realization of 'Science Education for All'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(2), 187-202.   DOI
57 Jho, H. (2015). A literature review of studies on decision-making in socio-scientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 791-936.   DOI
58 Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J. A., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350.   DOI
59 Lazonder, A., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718.   DOI
60 Doria, Y. J., Zohar, A., Fischer-Shachor, D., Kohan-Mass, J., & Carmi, M. (2018). Gender-fair assessment of young gifted students' scientific thinking skills. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 595-620.   DOI
61 Fuhrmann, T., Schneider, B., & Blikstein, P. (2018). Should students design or interact with models? Using the bifocal modelling framework to investigate model construction in high school science. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 867-893.   DOI
62 Lederman, J., Lederman, N., Bartels, S., Jimenez, J., Akubo, M., Aly, S., Bao, C., Blanquet, E., Blonder, R., Bologna Soares de Andrade, M., Buntting, C., Cakir, M., EL-Deghaidy, H., ElZorkani, A., Gaigher, E., Guo, S., Hakanen, A., Hamed Al-Lal, S., Han-Tosunoglu, C., ... Zhou, Q. (2019). An international collaborative investigation of beginning seventh grade students' understandings of scientific inquiry: Establishing a baseline. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 486-515.   DOI
63 Peel, A., Zangori, L., Friedrichsen, P., Hayes, E., & Sadler, T. (2019). Students' model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resistance through socio-scientific issues-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 510-532.   DOI
64 Zhang, L. (2018). Withholding answers during hands-on scientific investigations? Comparing effects on developing students' scientific knowledge, reasoning, and application. International Journal of Science Education, 40(4), 459-469.   DOI
65 Byun, T. (2017). A literature review on media-based learning in science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 417-427.   DOI
66 Crujeiras-Perez, B., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2019). Students' progression in monitoring anomalous results obtained in inquiry-based laboratory tasks. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 243-264.   DOI
67 Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
68 Davis, J. P., & Bellocchi, A. (2018). Objectivity, subjectivity, and emotion in school science inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1419-1447.   DOI
69 Adler, I., Schwartz, L., Madjar, N., & Zion, M. (2018). Reading between the lines: The effect of contextual factors on student motivation throughout an open inquiry process. Science Education, 102(4), 820-855.   DOI
70 Chi, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Won Han, S. (2018). Moderation of the effects of scientific inquiry activities on low SES students' PISA 2015 science achievement by school teacher support and disciplinary climate in science classroom across gender. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1284-1304.   DOI
71 Cruz-Guzman, M., Garcia-Carmona, A., & Criado, A. M. (2017). An analysis of the questions proposed by elementary pre-service teachers when designing experimental activities as inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1755-1774.   DOI
72 Duncan Seraphin, K., Harrison, G. M., Philippoff, J., Brandon, P. R., Nguyen, T. T. T., Lawton, B. E., & Vallin, L. M. (2017). Teaching aquatic science as inquiry through professional development: Teacher characteristics and student outcomes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1219-1245.   DOI
73 Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543-566.   DOI
74 van Riesen, S. A. N., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327-1344.   DOI
75 Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., Bartels, S. L., Meyer, A. A., & Schwartz, R. S. (2014). Meaningful assessment of learners' understandings about scientific inquiry- The views about scientific inquiry (VASI) questionnaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83.   DOI
76 Lee, B., Park, B., & Kim, H. (2007). Analyses of the basic inquiry process in korean 3-10 grade science textbooks: Focused on observation and measurement. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(5), 421-431.
77 Kang, & Keinonen, T. (2017). The effect of inquiry-based learning experiences on adolescents' science-related career aspiration in the Finnish context. International Journal of Science Education, 39(12), 1669-1689.   DOI
78 van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., Walma van der Molen, J. H., van Hest, E. G. W. C. M., & Poortman, C. (2017). Primary teachers conducting inquiry projects: effects on attitudes towards teaching science and conducting inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(2), 238-256.   DOI
79 van der Graaf, J., van de Sande, E., Gijsel, M., & Segers, E. (2019). A combined approach to strengthen children's scientific thinking: direct instruction on scientific reasoning and training of teacher's verbal support. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1119-1138.   DOI
80 Lamsa, J., Hamalainen, R., Koskinen, P., & Viiri, J. (2018). Visualising the temporal aspects of collaborative inquiry-based learning processes in technology-enhanced physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 40(14), 1697-1717.   DOI
81 Stender, A., Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., & Hartig, H. (2018). Making inquiry-based science learning visible: the influence of CVS and cognitive skills on content knowledge learning in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1812-1831.   DOI
82 Vorholzer, A., & von Aufschnaiter, C. (2019). Guidance in inquiry-based instruction-an attempt to disentangle a manifold construct. International Journal of Science Education, 41(11), 1562-1577.   DOI
83 Tsybulsky, D., Dodick, J., & Camhi, J. (2018). The effect of field trips to university research labs on israeli high school students' NOS understanding. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1247-1272.   DOI
84 van Schijndel, T. J. P., Jansen, B. R. J., & Raijmakers, M. E. J. (2018). Do individual differences in children's curiosity relate to their inquiry-based learning? International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 996-1015.   DOI
85 Villanueva, M. G., Hand, B., Shelley, M., & Therrian, W. (2019). The conceptualization and development of the practical epistemology in science survey(SPSS). Research in Science Education, 49(3), 635-655.   DOI
86 Wagh, A., Cook-Whitt, K., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Bridging inquiry-based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 615-641.   DOI
87 Ministry of Education (MOE) (2015). 2015 revised Science National Curriculum. No. 2015-74. Ministry of Education, Sejong, Korea.
88 van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education: scaffolding pupils' self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461-2481.   DOI
89 Walan, S., & Mc Ewen, B. (2017). Primary teachers' reflections on inquiryand context-based science education. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 407-426.   DOI
90 Kwon, N. & Ahn, J. (2012). The analysis on domestic research trends for convergence and integrated science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 265-278.   DOI
91 Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes toward science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049-1079.   DOI
92 Schon, D. (1987). A review of educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
93 Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
94 Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: Prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.   DOI
95 Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.   DOI
96 Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113-2135.   DOI
97 Tang, N. E., Tsai, C. L., Barrow, L., & Romine, W. (2019). Impacts of enquiry-based science teaching on achievement gap between high-and-low SES students: findings from PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 448-470.   DOI
98 Sanderson, B. A., & Kratochvil, D. W. (1971). Science-A Process Approach, product development report no. 8. Washington, D.C.: Office of Program Planning and Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 064-066)
99 Sandoval, W. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence. Science Education, 89, 634-656.   DOI
100 Moon, A., Stanford, C., Cole, R., & Towns, M. (2017). Analysis of inquiry materials to explain complexity of chemical reasoning in physical chemistry students' argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(10), 1322-1346.   DOI
101 Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2008). What scientists say: Scientists' views of nature of science and relation to science context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727-771.   DOI
102 Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-31.   DOI
103 Teacher Professional Growth Consortium. (1994). Modelling teacher professional growth. University of Melbourne, Unpublished working document.
104 van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & Walma van der Molen, J. H. (2013). Measuring primary teachers' attitudes toward teaching science: Development of the dimensions of attitude toward science (DAS) instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 35, 577-600.   DOI
105 Welch, W. W. (1981). Inquiry in school science. In N. Harms, & R. Yager, Project synthesis, What research says, Vol. 3 NSTA.
106 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. MA: Harvard University Press.
107 Wilmes, S. E. D., & Siry, C. (2018). Interaction rituals and inquiry-based science instruction: Analysis of student participation in small-group investigations in a multilingual classroom. Science Education, 102(5), 1107-1128.   DOI
108 Byun, T., Baek, J., Shim, H.-P., & Lee, D. (2019). An investigation on the implementation of the 'scientific inquiry experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 669-679.
109 Watkins, J., Hammer, D., Radoff, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Phillips, A. M. (2018). Positioning as not-understanding: The value of showing uncertainty for engaging in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 573-599.   DOI
110 Williams, R. T., Pringle, R. M., & Kilgore, K. L. (2019). A Practitioner's inquiry into vocabulary building strategies for native spanish speaking ELLs in inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education, 49(4), 989-1000.   DOI
111 Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265-278.   DOI
112 Battaglia, O. R., Di Paola, B., Persano Adorno, D., Pizzolato, N., & Fazio, C. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of modelling-oriented workshops for engineering undergraduates in the field of thermally activated phenomena. Research in Science Education, 49(5), 1395- 1413.   DOI
113 Jaber, L. Z., Dini, V., Hammer, D., & Danahy, E. (2018). Targeting disciplinary practices in an online learning environment. Science Education, 102(4), 668-692.   DOI
114 Jang, J. Y, & Hand, B. (2017). Examining the value of a scaffolded critique framework to promote argumentative and explanatory writings within an argument-based inquiry approach. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1213-1231.   DOI
115 Wu, P. H., Kuo, C. Y., Wu, H. K., Jen, T. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2018). Learning benefits of secondary school students' inquiry-related curiosity: A cross-grade comparison of the relationships among learning experiences, curiosity, engagement, and inquiry abilities. Science Education, 102(5), 917-950.   DOI
116 Baek, J., Byun, T., Lee, D., & Shim, H-P. (2020). An investigation on the assessment tool and status of assessment in the 'scientific inquiry experiment' of the 2015 revised curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(5), 515-529.   DOI
117 Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: research models and fugitive findings. In R. Wonziak & K. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3-44). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
118 Herranen, J., Kousa, P., Fooladi, E., & Aksela, M. (2019). Inquiry as a context-based practice - a case study of pre-service teachers' beliefs and implementation of inquiry in context-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1977-1998.   DOI