DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement of Localized Corrosion Resistance in Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Alloys Using Electrochemical Critical Localized Corrosion Temperature (E-CLCT) versus Electrochemical Critical Localized Corrosion Potential (E-CLCP)

적층가공 (3D 프린팅) Ti-6Al-4V합금의 국부부식 저항성 평가를 위한 임계국부부식온도와 임계국부부식전위 측정방법의 비교

  • Seo, Dong-Il (School of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kookmin University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Bong (School of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kookmin University)
  • 서동일 (국민대학교 공과대학 신소재 공학부) ;
  • 이재봉 (국민대학교 공과대학 신소재 공학부)
  • Received : 2021.01.20
  • Accepted : 2021.02.10
  • Published : 2021.02.26

Abstract

Additively manufactured (AM) Ti-6Al-4V alloys exhibit a dominant acicular martensite phase (α'), which is characterized by an unstable energy state and highly localized corrosion susceptibility. Electrochemical critical localized corrosion temperature (E-CLCT, ISO 22910: 2020) and electrochemical critical localized corrosion potential (E-CLCP, ISO AWI 4631: 2021) were measured to analyze the localized corrosion resistance of the AM Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Although E-CLCP was measured under mild corrosive conditions such as human body, the validity of evaluating localized corrosion resistance of AM titanium alloys was demonstrated by comparison with E-CLCT. However, the mechanisms of resistance to localized corrosion on the as-received and heat-treated AM Ti-6Al-4V alloys under E-CLCT and E-CLCP differ at various temperatures because of differences in properties under localized corrosion and repassivation. The E-CLCT is mainly measured for initiation of localized corrosion on the AM titanium alloys based on temperature, whereas the E-CLCP yields repassivation potential of re-generated passive films of AM titanium alloys after breaking down.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2019년도 산업통상자원부 및 산업기술평가관리원(KEIT) 연구비 지원에 의한 연구임(20006868).

References

  1. F. H. Froes and B. Dutta, Adv. Mater. Res., 1019, 19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1019.19
  2. T. J. Horn and O. L. Harrysson, Sci. Prog., 95, 255 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3184/003685012X13420984463047
  3. N. Dai, L. C. Zhang, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Ni, Y. Chen, M. Wu, and C. Yang, Corros. Sci., 111, 703 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2016.06.009
  4. D.-I. Seo, J.-B. Lee, Corros. Sci. Tech., 17, 129 (2018). https://doi.org/10.14773/cst.2018.17.3.129
  5. D.-I. Seo, J.-B. Lee, Corros. Sci. Tech., 18, 110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14773/cst.2019.18.3.110
  6. D.-I. Seo, J.-B. Lee, J. Electrochem. Soc., 166, C428 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0571913jes
  7. D.-I. Seo, J.-B. Lee, Corros. Sci., 173, 108789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108789
  8. M. I. Abdulsalam, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 16, 736 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-007-9090-7
  9. ISO/18089: 2015, Corrosion of metals and alloys - Determination of the critical crevice temperature (CCT) for stainless steels under potentiostatic control.
  10. J.-B. Lee, D.-I. Seo, H.-Y. Chang, Met. Mater. Inter., 26, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00484-z
  11. ISO/22910: 2020, Corrosion of metals and alloys - measurement of the electrochemical critical localized corrosion temperature (E-CLCT) for Ti alloys fabricated via the additive manufacturing method. https://www.iso.org/standard/74150.html
  12. ISO/17475: 2005, Electrochemical test methods - Guidelines for conducting potentiostatic and potentiodynamic polarization measurements. https://www.iso.org/standard/31392.html
  13. ASTM G192, Standard Test Method for Determining the Crevice Repassivation Potential of Corrosion-Resistant Alloys Using a Potentiodynamic-Galvanostatic-Potentiostatic Technique (2014). https://www.asminternational.org/search/-/journal_content/56/33542825/ASTMSTDTESTG0192-08/PUBLICATION-STANDARD-TEMPLATE
  14. ISO AWI 4631: 2021, Corrosion of metals and alloys - Measurement of the Electrochemical Critical Localized Corrosion Potential (E-CLCP) for Biomedical Ti Alloys Fabricated via Additive Manufacturing Method.
  15. J.-B. Lee, D.-I. Seo, and H.-Y. Chang, Met. Mater. Inter., (2021) Accepted.
  16. D.-I. Seo and J.-B. Lee, J. Electrochem. Soc., 167, 101509 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab9d64
  17. Chee Meng Benjamin Ho, Sum Huan Ng, and Yong-Jin Yoon, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Man., 16, 1035 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-015-0134-x
  18. F. G. Mur, D. Rodriguez, and J. A. Planell, J. Alloys. Comp., 234, 287 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-8388(95)02057-8
  19. N. Dai, L. C. Zhang, J. Zhang, Q. Chen, and M. Wu, Corros. Sci., 102, 484 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2015.10.041