실천공학교육논문지 (Journal of Practical Engineering Education)

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.165-176
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2288-405X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4068(eISSN)
한국실천공학교육학회 (Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고숙련마이스터 과정 운영의 성공요인 및 중요도 분석

Analysis of Success Factors and Importance of Highly Skilled Meister Training Degree Course Operation

  • 김동욱 (한국기술교육대학교 IT융합SW공학과) ;
  • 민준기 (한국기술교육대학교 컴퓨터공학부) ;
  • 김승희 (한국기술교육대학교 IT융합SW공학과)
  • Kim, Dong-wook (Dept. of IT Convergence Software Engineering, Korea University of Technology & Education (KOREATECH)) ;
  • Min, Jun-Ki (School of Computer Science and Engineering, Korea University of Technology & Education (KOREATECH)) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Hee (Dept. of IT Convergence Software Engineering, Korea University of Technology & Education (KOREATECH))
  • 투고 : 2021.02.09
  • 심사 : 2021.04.27
  • 발행 : 2021.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

일학습병행법에 근거하여, 일학습병행의 선순환적 학습체계를 마련하기 위하여 고숙련마이스터 과정이 시범적인 교육사업으로 운영 중에 있다. 이 과정은 학위연계형 정규4년제 대학의 석사학위와 일학습병행L6자격의 취득, 기술평가사, 국가공인 기업현장교사 배출을 목적으로 한다. 따라서, 이러한 역할을 원활히 수행할 수 있는 인재를 양성하기 위해서는 고숙련마이스터 과정을 운영하는 교육 기관의 성공적 운영과 훈련의 품질이 매우 중요하다. 본 연구에서는 고품질의 고숙련마이스터 과정을 운영할 수 있는 성공 요인을 도출하고 성공 요인 별 중요도를 도출하였다. 이를 위해 문헌연구, FGI, 유사 성과지표, 지난 5년간의 시범운영 기관 실적 자료 등을 수집하고 총 133개의 성공 요인을 도출하여 이를 기반으로 4P 기반의 성공요인 계층 모형을 설계하였다. 업무 전문가와 산업계 전문가를 대상으로 AHP 설문을 수행한 결과 4P 계층에서는 Price(훈련효율 및 가치)가 0.37로 가장 중요한 요인으로 도출되었고, 4P 계층 별 성공 요인 지표에서는 참여자 역량 향상(0.176), 기업 성과(0.101), 훈련과정 개발관리(0.086), 훈련 평가 관리(0.082), 현장 외 훈련(Off-JT) 관리(0.074) 요인이 상대적으로 중요도가 높게 나타났다. 본 연구는 고숙련마이스터 과정 활성화 시 운영 대상 기관의 선정과 교육 기관의 성과 평가를 위한 이론적 근거를 제공할 것이며, 지표 별 중요도는 실무 활용의 적합성을 높여줄 것으로 사료된다.

Based on the work and study in Parallel law, the Highly Skilled Meister Training Degree Course (HSMTDC) is being operated as a pilot education project in order to establish a virtuous cycle learning system for parallel work-learning. This course aims not only to earn a master's degree and work and studying in Parallel L6 qualification at a regular four-year university but also to rise technology assessor, and nation certified workplace trainers. Therefore, in order to cultivate human resources who can perform these roles smoothly, the successful operation of educational institutions that operate high-skilled master courses and quality of training is very important. In this study, success factors for operating high-quality, high-skilled master courses were derived and the importance of each success factor was derived. To this end, we collected literature studies, FGI, similar performance indicators, and data on the performance of pilot operating institutions over the past five years. After then derived a total of 133 success factors, and based on these, a 4P-based success factor hierarchy model was designed. As a result of conducting an AHP survey of business and industry experts, the "training efficiency and value" factor was identified as the most important factor at 0.37 within the 4P level. And the success factor index belonging 4P level were of relatively high importance by ordering as "Improve participant competency" (0.176), "corporate performance" (0.101), "training program development management" (0.086), "training evaluation management" (0.082), and "Off-JT training management" (0.074). This study will provide a theoretical basis for the selection of the institution to be operated and the evaluation of the performance of educational institutions when activating the high-skilled master course, and the importance of each indicator is expected to increase the suitability of practical uses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL), "Assistance act for work-and-study in parallel act of industrial sites," National Law Information Center, 2020.
  2. S. H. Kim, J. K. Min, D. W. Kim, M. C. Kim, and N. G. Kim, "Development of operation and diffusion model for high-skilled meister course of master degree-linked," Employment Vocational Competency Development Center of Korea University of Technical and Education, 2020-12 Research Report, 2021.
  3. High Skilled Meister Course Operation Plan, Human Resources Development Service of Korea, 2019.
  4. High Skilled Meister Course Operation Plan, Human Resources Development Service of Korea, 2020.
  5. S. W. Kang, "Performance evaluation of work-and-study in parallel," National Assembly Budget Office, Business Evaluation 16-16, no. 368, pp. 1-140, 2016.
  6. S. H. Jeon, "Issue analysis and diagnosis of Work-and-Study in Parallel System," Human Resources Development Service of Korea, KRIVET, 2018.
  7. D. Y. Kim, J. H. Jang, H. B, Lee, E. Y. Nae, S. J. Jeon, H. H. Hang, and S. J. Choi, "Improvement plan for training corporate field teachers and establishing a management system," Human Resources Development Service of Korea, KRIVET, 2017.12.
  8. S. H. Kim, Y. D. Sohn, D. W. Kim, and M. C. Kim, "Development of standard curriculum in degree-linked high-skilled meister courses of work-and-study in parallel," College of Work-and-Study in Parallel of Korea University of Technical and Education, 2019 Research Report, 2019.
  9. M. C. Kim, D. W. Kim, Y. D. Sohn, and S. H. Kim, "A Suggestion of Standard Curriculum Model for Strengthening the competency of high-skilled master workplace trainers in degree-linked work-and-study in parallel courses," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 181-193, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2019.181
  10. S. Lee and S. Y. Moon, "A study on the performance analysis of the use and diffusion of National Competency Standards (NCS)," DAEHAN Association of Business Administration, Academic Conf. Proceedings, pp. 62-65, 2016.
  11. D. Y. Park, Major Issues and Prospects for Lifelong Employee Education, The HRD Review, 62-72, 2017.
  12. K. Kang and K. Om, "Development of performance management system for contract departments in the Korean dual college1 context," Korea university of technology and education, HRD Center, pp. 1-174, 2017.
  13. S. H. Kim and W. J. Kim, "Study on the selection model CTQ data," Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 97-112, 2013. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2013.18.4.097
  14. T. L. Satty and K. P. Kearns, "Analytical planning: The organization of systems," The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, 4., 1985.