The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prosthetic rehabilitation of an oligodontia patient with atrophic maxilla

위축된 상악골을 가진 부분무치증 환자의 보철수복

  • Chi, Seung-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kim, Ye-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kang, Hyeon-Goo (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 지승석 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 김예진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 강현구 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 고경호 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 허윤혁 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2020.11.12
  • Accepted : 2021.02.03
  • Published : 2021.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Congenital tooth agenesis is the most common developmental dental anomaly, of which oligodontia is defined as the absence of six or more permanent teeth, except the third molars. Tooth agenesis causes malocclusion, alveolar atrophy, aesthetic and psychosocial problems. This clinical report describes a multidisciplinary treatment for a patient diagnosed as oligodontia, who exhibited absence of 14 permanent teeth, atrophy of maxillary alveolar bone, and mandibular protrusion. Restoration space was secured and tooth axis was improved by the extraction of deciduous teeth and orthodontic treatment. However, edge-to-edge bite of posterior teeth and arch dimension discrepancy due to atrophic maxilla was remained. To restore the aesthetics and functionality, implant retained prosthesis was planned. Considering minimal bone grafts, location and number of dental implants and prostheses design were determined. Through the gradual adjustment of provisional restoration, the appropriate centric and eccentric occlusion was reflected into a definitive prosthesis. Currently, stable functional results were attained, however, regular follow up and maintenance care over lifetimes should be performed.

선천성 치아결손은 가장 흔한 치아의 발육장애인데, 이 중 제3대구치를 제외한 6개 이상의 치아가 상실된 경우를 부분무치증(oligodontia)이라 한다. 이러한 치아결손은 부정교합, 치조제 위축, 심미적인 문제 및 사회심리적인 문제 등을 초래한다. 14개의 영구치 결손과 상악궁의 치조제 위축, 하악의 전돌 등이 관찰되는 부분무치증 환자에서 다학제 치료계획을 수립하였다. 만기잔존유치의 발거와 교정치료를 선행하여 보철수복공간을 확보하고 불량한 치축을 개선하였으나, 구치부 절단교합과 상악 치조제의 위축으로 인한 악궁 간 크기 차이가 잔존하였다. 치아결손 부위에 임플란트 식립을 이용한 고정성 보철수복을 계획하여 심미성과 기능성을 회복하고자 하였다. 골이식을 최소화하도록 임플란트의 식립 부위와 개수를 결정하였고, 보철물의 형태를 고려하였으며, 임시수복물에서 심미성과 교합안정성을 평가하였다. 점진적인 임시수복물 조정과정을 통해 적절한 중심교합과 측방운동 시 균형적인 교합을 형성하였으며, 이를 반영한 최종보철물을 제작하여 수복하였다. 현재 안정적으로 기능하고 있으나 전 생애에 걸친 유지관리 치료가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:510-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.027
  2. Rakhshan V. Congenitally missing teeth (hypodontia): A review of the literature concerning the etiology, prevalence, risk factors, patterns and treatment. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2015;12:1-13. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.150286
  3. Schalk-van der Weide Y, Steen WH, Bosman F. Distribution of missing teeth and tooth morphology in patients with oligodontia. ASDC J Dent Child 1992;59:133-40.
  4. Silva Meza R. Radiographic assessment of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003;13:112-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00436.x
  5. Becelli R, Morello R, Renzi G, Dominici C. Treatment of oligodontia with endo-osseous fixtures: experience in eight consecutive patients at the end of dental growth. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:1327-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3180a772ff
  6. Bergendal B, Norderyd J, Bagesund M, Holst A. Signs and symptoms from ectodermal organs in young Swedish individuals with oligodontia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2006;16:320-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00741.x
  7. Ruf S, Klimas D, Honemann M, Jabir S. Genetic background of nonsyndromic oligodontia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orofac Orthop 2013;74:295-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-013-0138-z
  8. Fujiwara T, Nakano K, Sobue S, Ooshima T. Simultaneous occurrence of unusual odontodysplasia and oligodontia in the permanent dentition: report of a case. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000;10:341-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263x.2000.00217.x
  9. Creton M, Cune M, Verhoeven W, Muradin M, Wismeijer D, Meijer G. Implant treatment in patients with severe hypodontia: a retrospective evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:530-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.012
  10. Durstberger G, Celar A, Watzek G. Implant-surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with multiple dental aplasia: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:417-23.
  11. Wagenberg BD, Spitzer DA. Therapy for a patient with oligodontia: case report. J Periodontol 2000;71:510-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.3.510
  12. Worsaae N, Jensen BN, Holm B, Holsko J. Treatment of severe hypodontia-oligodontia--an interdisciplinary concept. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:473-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.01.021
  13. Filius MA, Cune MS, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Visser A. Prosthetic treatment outcome in patients with severe hypodontia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2016;43:373-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12384
  14. Del Fabbro M, Ceresoli V. The fate of marginal bone around axial vs. tilted implants: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2014;7:S171-89.
  15. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958;28:113-30.
  16. Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: From TMJ to smile design. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 2006. p. 494, 522.
  17. Buschang PH, Hayasaki H, Throckmorton GS. Quantification of human chewing-cycle kinematics. Arch Oral Biol 2000;45:461-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(00)00015-7
  18. Radke JC, Kamyszek GJ, Kull RS, Velasco GR. TMJ symptoms reduce chewing amplitude and velocity, and increase variability. Cranio 2019;37:12-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2017.1365421
  19. Proschel P, Hofmann M. Frontal chewing patterns of the incisor point and their dependence on resistance of food and type of occlusion. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:617-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90082-0
  20. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71:546-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2000.71.4.546
  21. Ravida A, Saleh MHA, Muriel MC, Maska B, Wang HL. Biological and technical complications of splinted or nonsplinted dental implants: A decision tree for selection. Implant Dent 2018;27:89-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000721
  22. Joondeph DR. Retention and relapse. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, editors. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 1123-51.