DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A clinical report of hybrid telescopic double crown denture with friction pin in a failed double crown denture case

실패한 이중관 국소의치에서 하이브리드 텔레스코픽 이중관 국소의치를 이용한 임상증례

  • Park, Jong-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 박종훈 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조진현 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2020.05.10
  • Accepted : 2021.03.10
  • Published : 2021.04.30

Abstract

In removable partial dentures, many types of retentive systems have been studied and applied in clinical treatment. One of those systems is the double crown denture system which is widely used in European countries such as Germany and Sweden. Telescopic double crown dentures have several advantages such as convenience in maintaining oral hygiene, enabling to transfer occlusal force along the long axis of the abutment, and secondary splinting effect between the abutments which leads to higher clinical performance compared to conventional removal partial dentures. In this clinical case, the patient was initially restored with a maxillary hybrid telescopic double crown denture with friction pin using remaining natural teeth as abutments. After 7 years, due to lack of recall check-up and poor oral hygiene, the abutment teeth were affected by periodontitis and 4 out of 5 of the abutment teeth had to be extracted. 3 additional implants were placed and the original abutment tooth with the inner crown was maintained. The mandible had fixed prostheses including implants but nevertheless, with strategic implant placement, the patient adapted well and was satisfied with the new maxillary tooth-implant combined double crown denture.

가철성 국소의치 치료 시 유지력을 얻는 방법에 따라 많은 연구와 임상적인 적용이 이루어 지고 있다. 그중 한 종류인 이중관 의치는 독일과 스웨덴과 같은 유럽의 나라에서 널리 사용되어지고 있다. 텔레스코픽 이중관 국소의치는 구강 위생관리의 편의성, 지대치로 교합력의 수직적인 전달, 그리고 지대치들 간의 2차적인 고정과 같은 장점들이 있어 클라스프 유지형 가철성 국소의치에 비해 임상적으로 더 나은 결과를 보여줄 수 있다. 본 증례에서 처음에 환자는 자연치를 이용하여 상악에 프릭션핀을 이용한 하이브리드 텔레스코픽 이중관 의치를 제작하였습니다. 7년 뒤 환자의 불량한 구강위생관리 습관과 정기검진의 부재로 지대치들에 치주염이 발생하였고 5개중 4개의 자연치 지대치를 발치하게 되었다. 남은 1개의 자연치 지대치의 내관을 그대로 사용하면서 3개의 추가적인 임플란트를 식립하였다. 대합치인 하악이 고정성 보철임에도 불구하고 전략적인 임플란트 식립으로 인해 환자는 새롭게 제작된 상악 치아-임플란트 연합 이중관 의치에 적응하였고 만족하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Watt RG, Steele JG, Treasure ET, White DA, Pitts NB, Murray JJ. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009: implications of findings for clinical practice and oral health policy. Br Dent J 2013;214:71-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.50
  2. Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, Lewis BG, Barker LK, Thornton-Evans G, Eke PI, Beltrn-Aguilar ED, Horowitz AM, Li CH. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004. Vital Health Stat 11 2007;(248):1-92.
  3. Bernhart G, Koob A, Schmitter M, Gabbert O, Stober T, Rammelsberg P. Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1031-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0592-1
  4. Al-Imam H, Ozhayat EB, Benetti AR, Pedersen AM, Gotfredsen K. Oral health-related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis. J Oral Rehabil 2016;43:23-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12338
  5. Weaver JD. Telescopic copings in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:429-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90008-5
  6. Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
  7. Isaacson GO. Telescope crown retainers for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:436-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(69)90211-X
  8. Bottger H. The telescope system in dental prosthetics. Leipzig; Barth Verlag; 1961.
  9. Gungor MA, Artunc C, Sonugelen M. Parameters affecting retentive force of conus crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:271-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01036.x
  10. Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
  11. Weber H, Frank G. Spark erosion procedure: a method for extensive combined fixed and removable prosthodontic care. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:222-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90144-D
  12. Jo LJ. Spark erosion process: An overview. J Dent Implant 2011;1:2-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-6781.76424
  13. Nickenig HJ, Spiekermann H, Wichmann M, Andreas SK, Eitner S. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed and removable partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:131-7.
  14. Sakar O. Removable partial dentures: A practitioner's manual. Switzerland: Springer, 2016. p. 195-208.
  15. Akagawa Y, Seo T, Ohkawa S, Tsuru H. A new telescopic crown system using a soldered horizontal pin for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:228-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90145-E
  16. Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures-a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent 2012;40:22-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.017
  17. Ishida K, Nogawa T, Takayama Y, Saito M, Yokoyama A. Prognosis of double crown-retained removable dental prostheses compared with clasp-retained removable dental prostheses: A retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:268-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.12.006
  18. Krennmair G, Krainhofner M, Waldenberger O, Piehslinger E. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:617-22.
  19. Mitrani R, Brudvik JS, Phillips KM. Posterior implants for distal extension removable prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2003;23:353-9.
  20. Ben-Ur Z, Matalon S, Aviv I, Cardash HS. Rigidity of major connectors when subjected to bending and torsion forces. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:557-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90079-6