Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.2.201

A clinical report of hybrid telescopic double crown denture with friction pin in a failed double crown denture case  

Park, Jong-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.59, no.2, 2021 , pp. 201-209 More about this Journal
Abstract
In removable partial dentures, many types of retentive systems have been studied and applied in clinical treatment. One of those systems is the double crown denture system which is widely used in European countries such as Germany and Sweden. Telescopic double crown dentures have several advantages such as convenience in maintaining oral hygiene, enabling to transfer occlusal force along the long axis of the abutment, and secondary splinting effect between the abutments which leads to higher clinical performance compared to conventional removal partial dentures. In this clinical case, the patient was initially restored with a maxillary hybrid telescopic double crown denture with friction pin using remaining natural teeth as abutments. After 7 years, due to lack of recall check-up and poor oral hygiene, the abutment teeth were affected by periodontitis and 4 out of 5 of the abutment teeth had to be extracted. 3 additional implants were placed and the original abutment tooth with the inner crown was maintained. The mandible had fixed prostheses including implants but nevertheless, with strategic implant placement, the patient adapted well and was satisfied with the new maxillary tooth-implant combined double crown denture.
Keywords
Dental implant; Double crown; Overdenture;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Weaver JD. Telescopic copings in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:429-33.   DOI
2 Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
3 Isaacson GO. Telescope crown retainers for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1969;22:436-48.   DOI
4 Bottger H. The telescope system in dental prosthetics. Leipzig; Barth Verlag; 1961.
5 Gungor MA, Artunc C, Sonugelen M. Parameters affecting retentive force of conus crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:271-7.   DOI
6 Bernhart G, Koob A, Schmitter M, Gabbert O, Stober T, Rammelsberg P. Clinical success of implant-supported and tooth-implant-supported double crown-retained dentures. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1031-7.   DOI
7 Al-Imam H, Ozhayat EB, Benetti AR, Pedersen AM, Gotfredsen K. Oral health-related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis. J Oral Rehabil 2016;43:23-30.   DOI
8 Wenz HJ, Lehmann KM. A telescopic crown concept for the restoration of the partially edentulous arch: the Marburg double crown system. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:541-50.
9 Nickenig HJ, Spiekermann H, Wichmann M, Andreas SK, Eitner S. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed and removable partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:131-7.
10 Jo LJ. Spark erosion process: An overview. J Dent Implant 2011;1:2-6.   DOI
11 Sakar O. Removable partial dentures: A practitioner's manual. Switzerland: Springer, 2016. p. 195-208.
12 Akagawa Y, Seo T, Ohkawa S, Tsuru H. A new telescopic crown system using a soldered horizontal pin for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:228-31.   DOI
13 Dye BA, Tan S, Smith V, Lewis BG, Barker LK, Thornton-Evans G, Eke PI, Beltrn-Aguilar ED, Horowitz AM, Li CH. Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2004. Vital Health Stat 11 2007;(248):1-92.
14 Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures-a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent 2012;40:22-34.   DOI
15 Ishida K, Nogawa T, Takayama Y, Saito M, Yokoyama A. Prognosis of double crown-retained removable dental prostheses compared with clasp-retained removable dental prostheses: A retrospective study. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:268-75.   DOI
16 Watt RG, Steele JG, Treasure ET, White DA, Pitts NB, Murray JJ. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009: implications of findings for clinical practice and oral health policy. Br Dent J 2013;214:71-5.   DOI
17 Krennmair G, Krainhofner M, Waldenberger O, Piehslinger E. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:617-22.
18 Weber H, Frank G. Spark erosion procedure: a method for extensive combined fixed and removable prosthodontic care. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:222-7.   DOI
19 Mitrani R, Brudvik JS, Phillips KM. Posterior implants for distal extension removable prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2003;23:353-9.
20 Ben-Ur Z, Matalon S, Aviv I, Cardash HS. Rigidity of major connectors when subjected to bending and torsion forces. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:557-62.   DOI