DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Membrane-Bound Protein, MoAfo1, Is Involved in Sensing Diverse Signals from Different Surfaces in the Rice Blast Fungus

  • Sadat, Md Abu (Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Han, Joon-Hee (Division of Bioresource Sciences, Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Seongbeom (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Fungal Genetic Resources, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Yong-Hwan (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Fungal Genetic Resources, Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung Su (Division of Bioresource Sciences, Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Choi, Jaehyuk (Division of Life Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Incheon National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.08.16
  • 심사 : 2021.01.20
  • 발행 : 2021.04.01

초록

To establish an infection, fungal pathogens must recognize diverse signals from host surfaces. The rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, is one of the best models studying host-pathogen interactions. This fungus recognizes physical or chemical signals from the host surfaces and initiates the development of an infection structure called appressorium. Here, we found that protein MoAfo1(appressorium formation, MGG_10422) was involved in sensing signal molecules such as cutin monomers and long chain primary alcohols required for appressorium formation. The knockout mutant (ΔMoafo1) formed a few abnormal appressoria on the onion and rice sheath surfaces. However, it produced normal appressoria on the surface of rice leaves. MoAfo1 localized to the membranes of the cytoplasm and vacuole-like organelles in conidia and appressoria. Additionally, the ΔMoafo1 mutant showed defects in appressorium morphology, appressorium penetration, invasive growth, and pathogenicity. These multiple defects might be partially due to failure to respond properly to oxidative stress. These findings broaden our understanding of the fungal mechanisms at play in the recognition of the host surface during rice blast infection.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adachi, K. and Hamer, J. E. 1998. Divergent cAMP signaling pathways regulate growth and pathogenesis in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 10:1361-1374. https://doi.org/10.2307/3870646
  2. Bourett, T. M. and Howard, R. J. 1990. In vitro development of penetration structures in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Can. J. Bot. 68:329-342. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-044
  3. Chi, M.-H., Park, S.-Y., Kim, S. and Lee, Y.-H. 2009. A novel pathogenicity gene is required in the rice blast fungus to suppress the basal defenses of the host. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000401. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000401
  4. Chi, M.-H., Park, S.-Y. and Lee, Y.-H. 2009. A quick and safe method for fungal DNA extraction. Plant Pathol. J. 25:108-111. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2009.25.1.108
  5. Choi, J., Cheong, K., Jung, K., Jeon, J., Lee, G.-W., Kang, S., Kim, S., Lee, Y.-W. and Lee, Y.-H. 2013. CFGP 2.0: a versatile web-based platform for supporting comparative and evolutionary genomics of fungi and oomycete. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D714-D719. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1163
  6. Choi, W. and Dean, R. A. 1997. The adenylate cyclase gene MAC1 of Magnaporthe grisea controls appressorium formation and other aspects of growth and development. Plant Cell 9:1973-1983. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.9.11.1973
  7. DeZwaan, T. M., Carroll, A. M., Valent, B. and Sweigard, J. A. 1999. Magnaporthe grisea Pth11p is a novel plasma membrane protein that mediates appressorium differentiation in response to inductive substrate cues. Plant Cell 11:2013-2030. https://doi.org/10.2307/3871094
  8. Ebbole, D. J. 2007. Magnaporthe as a model for understanding host-pathogen interactions. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 45:437-456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094346
  9. Gilbert, R. D., Johnson, A. M. and Dean, R. A. 1996. Chemical signals responsible for appressorium formation in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 48:335-346. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1996.0027
  10. Goh, J., Jeon, J. and Lee, Y. H. 2017. ER retention receptor, MoERR1 is required for fungal development and pathogenicity in the rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae. Sci. Rep. 7:1259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01237-x
  11. Gong, X., Hurtado, O., Wang, B., Wu, C., Yi, M., Giraldo, M., Valent, B., Goodin, M. and Farman, M. 2015. pFPL vectors for high-throughput protein localization in fungi: detecting cytoplasmic accumulation of putative effector proteins. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 28:107-121. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-05-14-0144-TA
  12. Guo, M., Chen, Y., Du, Y., Dong, Y., Guo, W., Zhai, S., Zhang, H., Dong, S., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., Wang, P. and Zheng, X. 2011. The bZIP transcription factor MoAP1 mediates the oxidative stress response and is critical for pathogenicity of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001302
  13. Islam, M. T., Kim, K.-H. and Choi, J. 2019. Wheat blast in Bangladesh: the current situation and future impacts. Plant Pathol. J. 35:1-10. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.RW.08.2018.0168
  14. Kall, L., Krogh, A. and Sonnhammer, E. L. 2007. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction-the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:W429-W432. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm256
  15. Kamakura, T., Yamaguchi, S., Saitoh, K.-I., Teraoka, T. and Yamaguchi, I. 2002. A novel gene, CBP1, encoding a putative extracellular chitin-binding protein, may play an important role in the hydrophobic surface sensing of Magnaporthe grisea during appressorium differentiation. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 15:437-444. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.5.437
  16. Kim, S., Park, S.-Y., Kim, K. S., Rho, H.-S., Chi, M.-H., Choi, J., Park, J., Kong, S., Park, J., Goh, J. and Lee, Y.-H. 2009. Homeobox transcription factors are required for conidiation and appressorium development in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000757. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000757
  17. Koga, H., Dohi, K., Nakayachi, O. and Mori, M. 2004. A novel inoculation method of Magnaporthe grisea for cytological observation of the infection process using intact leaf sheaths of rice plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 64:67-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2004.07.002
  18. Kong, L.-A., Li, G.-T., Liu, Y., Liu, M.-G., Zhang, S.-J., Yang, J., Zhou, X.-Y., Peng, Y.-L. and Xu, J.-R. 2013. Differences between appressoria formed by germ tubes and appressoriumlike structures developed by hyphal tips in Magnaporthe oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 56:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2013.03.006
  19. Kou, Y., Tan, Y. H., Ramanujam, R. and Naqvi, N. I. 2017. Structure-function analyses of the Pth11 receptor reveal an important role for CFEM motif and redox regulation in rice blast. New Phytol. 214:330-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14347
  20. Kulkarni, R. D., Thon, M. R., Pan, H. and Dean, R. A. 2005. Novel G-protein-coupled receptor-like proteins in the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Genome Biol. 6:R24. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-3-r24
  21. Lee, Y.-H. and Dean, R. A. 1993. cAMP regulates infection structure formation in the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Plant Cell 5:693-700. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.5.6.693
  22. Liu, S. and Dean, R. A. 1997. G protein α subunit genes control growth, development, and pathogenicity of Magnaporthe grisea. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 10:1075-1086. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.9.1075
  23. Liu, W., Zhou, X., Li, G., Li, L., Kong, L., Wang, C., Zhang, H. and Xu, J.-R. 2011. Multiple plant surface signals are sensed by different mechanisms in the rice blast fungus for appressorium formation. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1001261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001261
  24. Ramanujam, R., Calvert, M. E., Selvaraj, P. and Naqvi, N. I. 2013. The late endosomal HOPS complex anchors active Gprotein signaling essential for pathogenesis in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 9:e1003527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003527
  25. Samalova, M., Meyer, A. J., Gurr, S. J. and Fricker, M. D. 2014. Robust anti-oxidant defences in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae confer tolerance to the host oxidative burst. New Phytol. 201:556-573. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12530
  26. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA. 1626 pp.
  27. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. and Kumar, S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:2725-2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  28. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. and Gibson, T. J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  29. Xu, J.-R. and Hamer, J. E. 1996. MAP kinase and cAMP signaling regulate infection structure formation and pathogenic growth in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Genes Dev. 10:2696-2706. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.10.21.2696