DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Present Status of and Development Plans for Legal Technology in the Fourth Industrial Revolution

4차 산업혁명시대 법정보기술의 현황과 발전방안

  • Lee, Sung-Jin (Department of Forensics in Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Lee, Yeon-Ju (Department of Forensics in Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Son, Hyoung-Kun (Department of Forensics in Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Gi-Bum (Department of Forensics in Sungkyunkwan University)
  • Received : 2021.01.04
  • Accepted : 2021.03.08
  • Published : 2021.03.31

Abstract

Klaus Schwab's discussion on the Fourth Industrial Revolution provides a framework for predicting the direction of legal technology development. Technological convergence, which has emerged as the core concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution has a significant effect on legal technology. In particular, various new technologies, such as legal chatbots and platforms, are being introduced to enhance efficiency and accessibility in the legal field. However, legal technology is still in its early stage, with institutional improvement needed to vitalize the industry. In this paper, we first specify the concept and classification of legal technology in Chapter 2, followed by trends and limitations in Chapter 3 and ways of vitalizing legal technology in the future in Chapter 4. To invigorate legal technology development, it is necessary to put in place legal regulatory measures that stipulate the active disclosure of legal data, such as precedents, and make free use of such measures. In the law, many issues, such as the safety of artificial intelligence, personal information protection, and ethical standards, will be discussed in the future. Therefore, via this paper, we hope to promote the formation of social consensus and prepare countermeasures, such as legislative measures.

4차 산업혁명에 대한 클라우스 슈밥(Klaus Schwab)의 논의는 법정보기술의 발전 방향을 예측할 수 있는 하나의 프레임이다. 4차 산업혁명의 핵심개념인 기술 융합은 법정보기술 분야에 상당한 영향을 미치고 있다. 해외 법조계에서는 법률 챗봇 및 플랫폼 등의 다양한 최신 기술을 도입하여 법률 업무의 효율성과 접근성을 증대시키고 있으나, 국내는 리걸테크 산업이 아직 초기단계에 머물러 있어 법정보기술 활성화를 위한 제도적 개선이 필요하다. 이를 위하여 본 논문에서는 제2장에서 법정보기술의 개념과 분류체계를 구체화하고 제3장에서 법정보기술 활용 현황과 한계를 살펴본 후, 제4장에서는 법정보기술 발전을 위한 개선 방안을 고찰하였다. 법정보기술의 활성화를 위해서는 판례 등의 법률 자료를 적극적으로 공개하고 공개된 자료를 자유롭게 활용할 수 있는 법적 규제 방안 마련이 필요하다. 또한, 법률 영역에 있어 인공지능의 안전성, 개인정보보호, 윤리기준 등의 다양한 쟁점이 예상되므로 본 논문을 통해 대응책이 마련되기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Al, P. (2017). "Persuadable: How Great Leaders Change Their Minds to Change the World." Educational Leadership, June 1.
  2. Asan Nanum Foundadtion (ANF) (2020). 2020 Startup Korea. Seoul: Asan Nanum Foundation.
  3. Ahn, D. (2021). "[Digital Life] AI and Ethics seen through 'Iruda' controversy." KyeongNam Newspaper, January 19.
  4. Ahn, H. (2018). "[Editor goes] The first AI lawyer in Korea to go to a law firm...'just 20 seconds', analysis that even the prosecutor missed." JoongAng Ilbo, April 15.
  5. Baek, S., Lim, G. & Yu, D. (2016). "Exploring Social Impact of AI." Informatization Policy, 23(4), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2016.23.4.003
  6. Baek, Y. (2011). Basics of Law and Legal Informatics. Korean Studies Information Service System.
  7. Baster, R. (2015). "Legal Tech 2.0: The World We Live in Now." https://www.legalexecutiveinstitute.com/legal-tech-2-0-the-world-we-live-in-now-byralph-baxter/, (Retrieved on December 27, 2020).
  8. Breydo, L. (2019). "LegalTech VC Investment Trends: Finally, An Industry Inflection Point?." https://businesslawtoday.org/2019/09/legaltech-vcinvestment-trends-finally-industry-inflectionpoint. (Retrieved on December 26, 2020)
  9. Byun, S. (2020). "A Study on the Problem of AI Bias in Data Ethics." Journal of Ethics, 148, 143-158.
  10. Chang, B. (2018). "Artificial Intelligence and Civil Law." HUFS Law Review, 43(4), 43-71. https://doi.org/10.17257/HUFSLR.2019.43.4.43
  11. Cho, H. & Lee, J. (2016). "A Study on Artificial Intelligence, Law and Argument." Journal of Law and Politics Research, 16(2), 295-320. https://doi.org/10.17926/kaolp.2016.16.2.295
  12. Choi, M. (2020). "Who is responsible for damages due to AI errors?' Artificial intelligence regulatory maintenance roadmap confirmed." Hankyoreh, December 24.
  13. Codex (2020). https://law.stanford.edu/codex-thestanford-center-for-legal-informatics. (Retrieved on December 26, 2020)
  14. Eun, J. & Hwang, S. (2020). "Exploratory Study on Policy Decision Making with Artificial Intelligence: Applying Problem Structuring Typology on Success and Failure Cases." Informatization Policy, 27(4), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2020.27.4.047
  15. Gang, H. (2020). "Passed 7 cases of public welfare bill in the ""Disclosure of unconfirmed judgments." Law Times, November 23.
  16. Goodenough, O. (2015). "Legal Technology 3.0." https://www.huffpost.com/entry/legaltechnology-30_b_6603658, (Retrieved on December 27, 2020).
  17. Han, H. (2018). "A Basic Study on the Possibility of Artificial Intelligence as a Legal Entity." Chungang Law Review, 20(3), 375-411.
  18. Han, A. (2020). "A Study on the Regulations of the Automated Legal Document Drafting Service." Civil Procedure, 24(3), 391-449. https://doi.org/10.30639/CP.2020.10.24.3.391
  19. Hong, S. (2018). A.I. Algorithm and Discrimination. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  20. Hongdao, Q., Bibi, S., Khan, A., Ardito, L. & Khaskheli, M. (2019). "Legal Technologies in Action: The Future of the Legal Market in Light of Disruptive Innovations." Sustainability, 11(4).
  21. Jang, W. (2020). "The advent of Legal Tech Era and Challenges." Civil Procedure, 24(1), 229-257. https://doi.org/10.30639/cp.2020.02.24.1.229
  22. Jeon, M. (2020). "The government presents a roadmap for overhauling laws, systems, and regulations in preparation for the era of artificial intelligence... 30 tasks." Artificial Intelligence Times, December 25.
  23. Judicial Policy Research Institute (JPRI) (2018). Research on cooperation of Legal Information between the Legislature and the Judiciary. Gyeonggi Province: Judicial Policyi Research Institute.
  24. Jung, J. (2018). "DDR & AJU, Introduces AI Lawyer for the First Time in Korea...If you ask in everyday language, AI Lawyer finds laws and precedents." Chosunmedia, Febrary 27.
  25. Kim, D. (2019). "National Assembly introduces artificial intelligence to legislative information system." IT Chosun, September 2.
  26. Kim, H. (2020). "Legal Tech startup pioneering "half-price" legal services." Asia Economy News, May 15.
  27. Kim, I. (2016). "[Because it is a person, it is management, by Kim In-soo] Why can't the judge himself realize it?" Mail Business News, March 15.
  28. Kim, J. (2020a). "A Legal Policy Study on the Safety of Artificial Intelligence and Human Ethics." Law Review, 20(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.19166/lr.v20i1.2437
  29. Kim, J. (2020b). "Verhaltenssteuerung durch Algorithmen und der virtuelle Verwaltungsakt im KI(AI)-Zeitalter." Public Law, 48(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.38176/PublicLaw.2020.02.48.3.287
  30. Kim, S. (2018). "The computer programing of legal analysis and legal reasoning of AI." Law & Technology, 14(2), 33-40.
  31. Kim, S. & Jeong, G. (2018). "Suggestions for the introduction of Artificial Intelligence into the legal field - Focused on cases of trade secret infringement." Law & Technology, 15(2), 68-89.
  32. Kim, S. (2020d). "[FACT CHECK] The choice of AI is value-neutral?... Experts "It's just an illusion"." Yonhap News, October 9.
  33. Kim, S. (2020e). "Seeking development of Legal Tech in the AI era and Changes in the Future Legal Markt." Legal Theory and Practice Review, 8(3), 85-128. https://doi.org/10.30833/ltpr.2020.08.8.3.85
  34. Korea Government (KG) (2020). Artificial Intelligence Law, System, and Regulation Maintenance Roadmap. Seoul: Korea Government.
  35. Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA) (2020). Major Contents and Prospects of Three Data Bills. Naju: Korea Internet & Security Agency.
  36. Korea Legislation Research Institute (KLRI) (2019). Development and utilization of Legal Tech.Legal AI. Sejong: Korea Legislation Research Institute.
  37. Learning Hub (2019). "What Is Legal Tech? (+How It's Changing the Legal Industry)." https://learn.g2.com/legal-tech. (Retrieved on December 26, 2020).
  38. Lee, I. & Kang, C. (2018). "A Study on the Theory of Criminal Law of Artificial Intelligence Robots - Focusing on criminal ability and criminal liability." Law Review, 18(3), 21-54.
  39. Lee, W. (2018). "The Limitations of Criminal Law Theory in the Response to Artificial Intelligence." Contemporary Review of Criminal Law, 59, 444-475.
  40. Ministry of Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (MMCST) (2021). Three Data Bills. Sejong: Policy Briefing.
  41. Lew, I. (1992). "What is Legal Informatics?" Korean Journal of Law & Society, 5, 233-244.
  42. National Assembly Research stkththdService (NARS) (2019a). A study on the possibility of introducing artificial intelligence (AI) to the work of the National Assembly Research Service. Seoul: National Assembly Research Service.
  43. National Assembly Research Service (NARS) (2019b). Legislative Status and Prospects Related to Artificial Intelligence. Seoul: National Assembly Research Service.
  44. National Assembly Research Service (NARS) (2019c). Artificial Intelligence Technology.Utilization.Talent Status and Implications. Seoul: National Assembly Research Service.
  45. Oh, B. (2017). "Legal Protection and Utilization of Lawfully Published Personal Information." Kyung Hee Law Journal, 38(2), 1-25.
  46. Park, K. (2018). "Data Protection Laws on Publicly Available Data." Chonnam Law Review, 38(2), 1-25.
  47. Park, S. (2018b). "Innovating the Implementation of Law Based on Artificial Intelligence and Other Information Technology." Journal of Korea Information Law, 22(2), 133-162. https://doi.org/10.14801/jkiit.2018.16.1.133
  48. Richards, R. (2014). From the People's Perspective: Assessing the Representational Validity of a Coding Scheme of Citizens' Legal Communication about Ballot Initiatives, Paper represented at National Communication Association Annual Convention.
  49. Reuters (2018). "Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women." https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobsautomation-insight/amazon-scraps-secret-airecruiting-tool-that-showed-bias-againstwomen-idUSKCN1MK08G (Retrieved on November 20, 2019).
  50. Schwab, K. (2016a). "The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Respond." World Economic Forum, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrialrevolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond. (Retrieved on June 25, 2020).
  51. Schwab, K. (2016b). "2016 International Legal Symposium." Supreme Court, https://tv.naver.com/v/1198460. (Retrived on June 25, 2020).
  52. Seo, H. (2019). "A Preliminary Discussion on Policy Decision Making of AI in The Fourth Industrial Revolution." Informatization Policy, 26(3), 3-35.
  53. Seul, M. (2016). "Current Status and Future Developments of Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence in Law:Focusing the Cusp of Machine Learning in U.S. and Discourses over Legal Profession and Law School Education." The Justice, 156, 269-302.
  54. Shai, D., Jonathan, L., Liora, A. & Daniel, K. (2011). "Extraneous factors in judicial decisions." National Academy of Sciences, 108(17), 6889-6892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018033108
  55. Shim, J. (2018a). "IBM, AI bias, don't worry now." Byline Network, October 19.
  56. Shim, W. (2018b). "Artificial Intelligence and IT Legal System : Focusing on Implications of the Legal Informatics." Northeast Asian Law Journal, 12(1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.19035/nal.2018.12.1.3
  57. Shim, W. (2018c). "Legislative Studies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence." Law Review, 29(2), 11-49.
  58. Shim, W. (2019). "Data Science and Legislative Practice : A Pilot Design for Introduction Strategy of National Assembly Research Service." Korean Journal of Law & Society, 62(0), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.33446/KJLS.62.1
  59. Shin, S. (2015). "Study on the Korea Information System of Criminal Justice Services." Convergence Security Journal, 15(4), 147-153.
  60. Shin, J. (2016). "The era when online divorce and judgment results can be predicted is coming soon." Law Times, October 20.
  61. Shin, Y. (2019), "Policy and Legislation related to Safety of Artificial Intelligence." The Magazine of the IEEE, 46(10), 17-22.
  62. Software Policy & Research Institute (SPRI) (2020). "Trends and issues following the digital transformation of the legal industry." https://spri.kr/posts/view/22504?code=industry_trend, (Retrieved on December 27).
  63. Son, H. (2019). IT&Media Law in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Seoul: Parkyoungsa.
  64. Song, S. (2019). "Legal Ethics in LegalTech Age." Aju Law Review, 12(4), 173-201. https://doi.org/10.21589/ajlaw.2019.12.4.173
  65. Wikipedia (2020). "Legal technology." https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Legal_technology. (Retrieved on December 26, 2020)
  66. Won, D. & Lee, S. (2016), "Implication of AI and 4th Industrial Revolution." Induristrial Engineering Managine, 23(2), 13-22.
  67. Yang, J. (2016), "The Regulation of Total Surveillance." The Law Reasearch institutute of Hongik Univ., 17(2), 277-305. https://doi.org/10.16960/jhlr.17.2.201606.277
  68. Zion Market Research (ZMR) (2020). "Legal Practice Management Software Market- By Deployment (Cloud-Based Deployment, On-Premise Deployment), By Application (Legal Firms, Attorneys, Law Courts)- Global Industry Perspective Comprehensive Analysis And Forecast, 2020 - 2026." https://www.zionmarketresearch.com/report/legal-practice-management-softwaremarket, (Retrieved on December 29).