Informatization Policy (정보화정책)

National Information Society Agency (한국지능정보사회진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Privacy Concerns on Using Mobile Payment Services: Moderating Effect of Multidimensional Consumer Innovativeness

프라이버시 우려가 모바일 간편결제 서비스 이용에 미치는 영향: 소비자 혁신성의 다차원적 조절효과를 중심으로

  • Heo, Deok-Won (Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Sung, Wook-Joon (Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2020.11.13
  • Accepted : 2021.02.09
  • Published : 2021.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of privacy concerns on the use of mobile payment services. In particular, paying attention to the multidimensionality of consumer innovation, we analyzed the effects of hierarchical logistic regression by gender. The results show that there is a positive (+) relationship for hedonic innovativeness regardless of gender, and that there is a negative (-) relationship for functional innovativeness overall and in the female group. In all groups regardless of gender, a positive (+) relationship was found for the hedonic innovativeness, and one negative (-) relationship was found in the functional innovativeness overall group and the female group. Second, in the male group, there is a moderating effect of privacy concerns and functional innovativeness. This suggests that the relationship between privacy concerns and the usage of mobile payment services may vary depending on functional innovativeness. This study is useful in that it can explain and predict consumers' patterns of use of new technology-based services in various and balanced ways by taking privacy concerns and multidimensional consumer innovation into consideration. In addition, it suggests that mobile payment companies should make efforts to ensure that their services are secure, useful, and fun to use so that consumers can feel confident using the services in various situations.

본 연구는 프라이버시 우려가 모바일 간편결제 서비스 이용에 미치는 영향을 탐색하였다. 특히 기존 단일차원으로 논의되어 온 소비자 혁신성의 한계를 넘어 기능적·쾌락적·사회적·인지적 측면의 다차원적 소비자 혁신성을 적용하여 프라이버시 우려와 실제 행동 간의 일치·불일치 여부를 성별(남·여)로 구분하여 위계적 방법의 로지스틱 조절효과 분석을 수행하였다. 그 결과, 성별을 막론한 모든 그룹에서 쾌락적 혁신성은 양(+)의 관계가 나타났으며, 기능적 혁신성은 여성 그룹에서 유의한 음(-)의 관계가 나타났다. 특히, 남성 집단에서는 프라이버시 우려와 기능적 혁신성의 조절효과가 나타났는데, 개인이 인지하는 기능적 혁신성에 따라 프라이버시 우려에 따른 모바일 간편결제 서비스 이용 여부가 달라질 수 있음을 시사한다. 본 연구를 통해 프라이버시 우려와 더불어 다차원적인 소비자 혁신성을 고려할 때 소비자의 신기술 기반 서비스 채택 양상을 다양하고 균형 있게 설명·예측할 수 있다는 점과 모바일 간편결제 서비스가 이용자의 즐거움과 더불어 해당 서비스가 보안 안전성을 기반으로 다양한 상황에서 유용하게 사용될 수 있다는 확신을 소비자들에게 보여주어야 함을 연구의 시사점으로 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Agarwal, R. & Prasad, J. (1998). "A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology." Information systems research, 9(2), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  2. Ahuja, M. K. & Thatcher, J. B. (2005). "Moving beyond intentions and toward the theory of trying: effects of work environment and gender on post-adoption information technology use." MIS quarterly, 29(3), 427-459. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148691
  3. An, J., Lee, S., An, E. & Kim, H. (2016). "Fintech Trends and Mobile Payment Service Anlaysis in Korea:Application of Text Mining Techniques." Informatization Policy. 23(3), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2016.23.3.026
  4. Acquisti, A. (2004). Privacy and security of personal information. In Economics of Information Security (pp. 179-186). Springer, Boston, MA.
  5. Bank of Korea (2020). "Electronic Payment Service Usage in 2019". 2020.3.24.
  6. Barnes, S. B. (2006). "A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States." First Monday, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394
  7. Baumgartner, H. (2002). "Toward a personology of the consumer." Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 286-292. https://doi.org/10.1086/341578
  8. Bhatti, (2007). "Exploring Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Commerce." Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce. 12.
  9. Brackett, L. K. & Carr, B. N. (2001). "Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: Consumer vs. mature student attitudes." Journal of advertising research, 41(5), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-41-5-23-32
  10. Chiu, Y., Lin, C. & Tang, L. (2005). "Gender differs: assessing a model of online purchase intentions in e-tail service." International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(5), 416-435. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230510625741
  11. Choi, H., Lee, M. & Lee, H. (2019). "Is There a Privacy Paradox in the Online Purchasing Context?: The Study on the Effects of Privacy Concern and Online Purchasing Behavior." Journal of Product Research, 37, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.36345/kacst.2019.37.5.001
  12. Choi, Y. & Choi. H. (2017). "Mediating Effect of Cognitive Trust and Emotional Trust on Satisfaction of Mobile Easy Payment Services According to Gender." Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 17(11). 525-532. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.11.525
  13. Chung, Y. & Koo, T. (2015). Fintech, Seize the Opportunity. Seoul: The Korea Economic Daily.
  14. Conger, J, A. (1998), "The Necessary Art of Persuasion." Harvard Business Review, May/June, 84-94.
  15. Davis, H. L. & Rigaux, B. P. (1974). "Perception of marital roles in decision processes." Journal of consumer Research, 1(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1086/208581
  16. Dawson, J. F. (2014). "Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how." Journal of business and psychology, 29(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
  17. Dinev, T. & Hart, P. (2005). "Internet privacy concerns and social awareness as determinants of intention to transact." International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 7-29. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415100201
  18. Eom, J. (2019). A Study on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Employment Stability of Adult Household Heads. Korean Labor & Income Panel Study Conference, 2019, DEC 20.
  19. Financial Services Commission (2020). "The 3rd plenary meeting of the Regulatory Proof Committee was held-142 cases were deliberated, 26 cases were decided to improve". https://www.fsc.go.kr/info/ntc_news_view.jsp?menu=7210100&bbsid=BBS0030&no=33965. (Revrieved on November 9).
  20. Fischer, E. & Arnold, S. J. (1994). "Sex, gender identity, gender role attitudes, and consumer behavior." Psychology & Marketing, 11(2), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220110206
  21. Foxall, G. R., Goldsmith, R. E. & Brown, S. (1998). Consumer psychology for marketing (Vol. 1). Cengage Learning EMEA.
  22. Hartman, J. B., Shim, S., Barber, B. & O'Brien, M. (2006). "Adolescents' Utilitarian and Hedonic Web-Consumption Behavior: Hierarchical Influence of Personal Values and Innovativeness." Psychology & Marketing, 23(10), 813-839. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20135
  23. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2015). "A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling." J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  24. Hirschman, E. C. (1980). "Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity." Journal of Consumer Research, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp. 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1086/208816
  25. Huffman, C., Ratneshwar, S. & Mick, D. G. (2000). "Consumer goal structures and goal determination processes: An integrative framework." The why of consumption: Contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, goals, and desires, 9-35.
  26. Hur. J., Kim. S., Cha. N. & Hwang J. (2016). "Research on User Attitudes of Information Privacy : Focusing on the New Payment Systems." Information Society & Media, 17(3), 75-97.
  27. Hwang, S. & Kim, J. (2018). "The Study of User Resistance to Fintech Payment Service: In the Perspective of Innovation Diffusion And Status Quo Bias Theory." The Journal of Information Systems. 27(1), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2018.27.1.133
  28. Jeong, Y., Lee, C. & Han, J. (2019). "The Effect of Consumer innovativeness Characteristics for VR Leisure Sports Contents Users on Acceptance Intention: Focused on Technology Acceptance Model." Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park. 43(4). 77-89. https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2019.12.43.4.77
  29. Kim, E. (2017). "The Effect of Service Quality and Company Reputationon Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Mobile Payment: Moderating Effects of Switching Barriers." Master's Thesis, Seoul National University.
  30. Kim, H., Shi, Yi. & Lee D. (2018). "A study on the Service Attributes on Satisfaction and Intention to Reuse of Mobile Easy Payment Services According to Gender : Focusing on Chinese Users." The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, 18(6), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.37272/JIECR.2018.12.18.6.329
  31. Kim, H. (2011). "Dual Path Impacts of the Consumer Innovativeness in the New Products Adoption Situation." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(8), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.8.187
  32. Kim, S. & Park, H. (2012). "The Effects of Precedence Factors for Privacy Concern Reduction and Trust on Intention to Use Location-Based Services and a Moderating Effect of Personal Innovation." The Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2012.21.2.73
  33. Kim, S. & Kim, J. (2017). "Impact of Privacy Concern and Institutional Trust on Privacy Decision Making : A Comparison of E-Commerce and Location-Based Service." Journal of the Korea Society Industrial Information System, 22(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2017.22.1.069
  34. Kim, S. & Kim, J. (2018). "Privacy Paradox : A Literature Review and Future Direction." Information Systems Review, 20(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.14329/isr.2018.20.1.115
  35. Ko, K. (2017). "Review of Application of Logistic Regression in Public Administration Research." Modern Society and Public Administration, 27(4). 3-33.
  36. KOIT (2020). Easy Payment Service Market Trillion... Simplified authentication leaves security insecurity still. Aug. 5.
  37. Korea Information Society Development Institute (2020). Analysis of e-commerce behavior. vol. 20-16.
  38. Korea Information Society Development Institute (2019). Korea Media Panel Survey Statistics User Guide.
  39. Korea Internet Self-governance Organization (2020). "Domestic Tech + Fin Trends and Prospects." https://journal.kiso.or.kr/?p=10113.
  40. Kokolakis, S. (2017). "Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon." Computers & security, 64, 122-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002
  41. Lee. C., Maeng. Y. & Lee. C. J. (2015). "A Study on the Factors Affecting Privacy Paradox: Focusing on SNS." Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 14(2), 99-112.
  42. Lee, D. & Kim, M. (2011). "A Study on the e-Commerce Adopters' Information Privacy Concerns and Response Behaviors." The e-Business Studies, 12(2), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.15719/geba.12.2.201106.365
  43. Lee, E., Lee, J., Cho, M., Sung, Y. & Choi, S. (2018). "The Effect of Innovativeness and Self-Regulatory Focus on the Use of Internet of Things." The Korean Psychological Association, 19(1), 67-91.
  44. Lee, J. Y. & Kang, H. (2015). "The Effect of Privacy Concerns on Continued Use of SNS: Interaction Effect of Trust and Perceived Usefulness." Knowledge Management Research, 16(4), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.15813/kmr.2015.16.4.004
  45. Lee, M & Shim, J.(2009). The Moderating Effect by Gender in the Relationship between the Perception of Online Privacy and Use of Privacy Protection Strategy. Media, Gender & Culture (12), 165-190.
  46. Lewis, W., Agarwal, R. & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). "Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers." MIS quarterly, 657-678.
  47. Korea Development Bank (2018). "Korea Development Bank Monthly". Seoul: Korea Development Bank. 754, 92-110.
  48. Meyers-Levy, J. & Maheswaran, D. (1991). "Exploring differences in males' and females' processing strategies." Journal of consumer research, 18(1), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1086/209241
  49. Muller, MP., Tomlinson, G., Marrie, TJ., Tang, P., McGeer, A., Low, DE. & Gold, WL. (2005). "Can routine laboratory tests discriminate between severe acute respiratory syndrome and other causes of community-acquired pneumonia?" Clinical Infectious Diseases. 40(8):1079-1086. https://doi.org/10.1086/428577
  50. Midgley, D. F. & Dowling, G. R. (1978). "Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement." Journal of consumer research, 4(4), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1086/208701
  51. National Information Society Agency.(2019). National Information White Paper. Daegu: National Information Society Agency.
  52. Oh, S. & Song, J. (2014). "The Determinant of Trust in Online Transaction Process by Gender Difference." The Journal of Industrial Innovation. 30(4), 143-172.
  53. Ong, C. S. & Lai, J. Y. (2006). "Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance." Computers in human behavior, 22(5), 816-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
  54. Park, S. C. & Chung, N. H. (2010). "Understanding Gender Differences in Internet Shopping Mall Usage Behavior: A Focused on Mediating Role of Online WOM Propensit." Korean Journal of Business Administration, 23(2), 675-695.
  55. Park, S. G. (2015). "Research on Fintech Industry Trends and Key Business Models." Korea Multimedia Society, 19(1), 1-8.
  56. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation. New York; Free Press
  57. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 2003. Print.
  58. Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of Innovations; a cross-cultural approach.
  59. Ryu, Y. (2012). "Perceived Consumers' product Innovation Scale Development and Validation: Focused on College students and Electronic Devices." The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 13(2), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2012.13.2.159
  60. Smith, H. J., T. Dinev, & H. Xu (2011). "Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review." MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989-1015. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409970
  61. Shin, I. (2020). "Difference of Privacy Paradox on Open and Closed SNS." Informatization Policy, 27(1). 72-91. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2020.27.1.072
  62. Shin. I. & Kim. H. (2018). "Privacy Concerns and SNS Activities: Focusing on the Validity and Explanations of the Existence of a Privacy Paradox." Korea Association For Telecommunications Policies, 25(2), 33-67.
  63. Shim, D. (2020). "Adoption of Media Devices and Services according to Individual Innovativeness." KISDI STAT Report, 20-03.
  64. Sweeney, J. C. & Soutar, G. N. (2001). "Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale." Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
  65. Vandecasteele, B. & Guenes, M. (2010). "Motivated consumer innovativeness:Concept, measurement, and validation." International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(4), 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.08.004
  66. Venkatesh, V. & Morris, M. G. (2000). "Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior." MIS quarterly, 115-139.
  67. Xu, H. & Gupta, S. (2009). "The effects of privacy concerns and personal innovativeness on potential and experienced customers' adoption of location-based services." Electronic Markets, 19(2-3), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-009-0012-4
  68. Yonhapnews Television (2020). "Unstable Easy Payment Service... 60% are 'security issues'." Aug. 1.
  69. Yu, S. (2012). "The Effects of Consumer Functional, Hedonic, and Social Innovativeness on Purchase Intention: Perceived Usability and Capability The Effects of Consumer Functional, Hedonic, and Social Innovativeness on Purchase Intention: Perceived Usability and Capability." Journal of Marketing Management Research, 17(3), 45-68.