환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)

한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내외 해양생태계 관리계획의 네트워크 분석

Network Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Marine Ecosystem Management Plans

  • 투고 : 2021.01.08
  • 심사 : 2021.02.15
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

해양과 연안 지역의 과도한 개발과 이용으로 인하여 해양생태계에 발생하는 문제들을 해결하기 위하여 많은 국가에서 해양생태계 관리계획을 수립하여 시행하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 네트워크 분석법을 적용하여 우리나라와 주요 해양 국가들의 해양생태계 관리 방향 및 특성을 분석하였다. 분석 결과 국내외 공통적으로 해양생태계 관리 기반 구축, 국제적 협력 및 파트너십 구축, 기후변화 대응 강화와 관련된 내용을 포함하고 있었으며, strengthen, promote, improve, establish 등의 단어가 많이 사용된 핵심어로 나타났다. 하지만 세부적인 관리계획에서는 다소 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났는데, 국외에서는 특정 종에 대한 관리계획의 제시와 이미 수행 중인 제도적 기반을 개선하는 단계인 반면, 국내의 경우 포괄적인 해양생물 관리 강화 및 해양생태계 관리를 위한 제도적 기반을 구축하는 단계임을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 국내·외 해양생태계 관리 방향을 이해하고 향후 국내 지역의 해양생태계 관리계획 수립 시 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Many countries have established and implemented marine ecosystem management plans to solve various problems arising from excessive development and use of marine and coastal areas. In this study, network analysis was applied to compare and understand marine ecosystem management's direction and characteristics in Korea and other maritime countries. The results showed that the words 'strengthen,' 'promote,' 'improve,' and 'establish' were the keywords used a lot in domestic and foreign marine ecosystem management plans. Establishing a foundation for marine ecosystem management, establishing international cooperation and partnerships, and strengthening climate change adaptation was commonly included. However, there were some differences in detailed management plans. In foreign countries, it aims to present management measures for certain species and improve the existing institutional foundation. Still, in Korea, it aims to strengthen the comprehensive management of marine life and establish an institutional foundation for marine ecosystems. This study is expected to help understand the direction of domestic and overseas marine ecosystem management and establish a domestic marine ecosystem management plan in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An DH, Kim JI. 2018. Proposing policy for the prevention of marine pollution from microplastics. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration. 26(3): 77-102. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2018.26.3.77
  2. Bae HM. 2019. A discussion from a new perspective on island policy and management in Korea. The Journal of Korean Island. 31(1): 1-14. [Korean Literature]
  3. Cabinet Decision of Japan. 2018. The third basic plan on ocean policy. Japan.
  4. Chang IH. 2016. A study on rational improvement plan of marine ranching system for sustainable use of fishery resources. Law & Policy Review. 22(2): 223-253. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.36727/jjlpr.22.2.201608.008
  5. Cho JN. 2011. A study for research area of library and information science by network text analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management. 28(4): 65-83. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.065
  6. David CS, Elizabeth AF, Petrina A, Ian DC, Bronwyn MG, Marcus H, Keith JS, Anthony DMS, Joanna V, Tim MW. 2017. Implementing marine ecosystem-based management: lessons from Australia. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 74(7): 1990-2003. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx113
  7. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC). 2012. Placentia Bay/Grand Banks large ocean management area. Canada.
  8. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC). 2013. Gulf of St.Lawrence integrated management plan. Canada.
  9. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC). 2014. Regional oceans plan: Scotian shelf, Atlantic coast, bay of Fundy. Canada.
  10. Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC). 2017. Pacific north coast integrated management area plan. Canada.
  11. Government of United States. 2010. Final recommendations of the interagency ocean policy task force. United States.
  12. Heo G. 2020. A study on the research trends on the marine policy through network analysis in recent 11 years. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education. 32(2): 594-606. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2020.4.32.2.594
  13. Jeon JW, Wang Y, Yeo GT. 2016. SNA approach for analyzing the research trend of international port competition. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 32(3): 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.09.005
  14. Kho JC, Cho KT, Cho YH. 2013. A study on recent research trend in management of technology using keywords network analysis. Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society. 19(2): 101-123. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2013.19.2.101
  15. Kim BR, Lee JH, Kwon HS. 2017. Recent ecological asset research trends using keyword network analysis. Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment. 26(5): 303-314. [Korean Literature]
  16. Kim HK, Kwon KS, Jang DH. 2016. Language network analysis of 'Marine environment' in news frame. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 16(5): 385-398. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.05.385
  17. KMA: Comprehensive Climate Change Monitoring Information [Internet]. 2020. Korea Meteorological Administration; [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: http://www.climate.go.kr/home/09_monitoring/main.
  18. Lee HJ, Sung KJ. 2018. Analysis of domestic and foreign Local Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plan (LBSAP) using semantic network analysis. Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment. 27(1): 92-104. [Korean Literature]
  19. Lee SS. 2013. A content analysis of journal articles using the language network analysis methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management. 31(4): 49-68. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049
  20. Lee SY. 2016. Marine living resources conservation and international fishery law. Hannam Journal of Law & Technology. 22(1): 199-238. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2016.22.1.199
  21. Lee WK, Lee DS. 2014. A study on the directions of marine tourism policy through the analysis of marine tourism development policy in Korea. The Journal of Korean Island. 26(1): 69-97. [Korean Literature]
  22. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF). 2019. 2nd Master plan for conservation an management of marine ecosystem [Korean Literature]
  23. National Ocean Council (NOC). 2013. National ocean policy implementation plan. United States.
  24. Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Body (RPB). 2016. Mid-Atlantic regional ocean action plan. United States.
  25. Northeast Regional Planning Body (RPB). 2016. Northeast ocean plan. United States.
  26. Marine Estate Management Authority (MEMA). 2018. NSW marine estate management strategy. Australia.
  27. Northern Territory (NT). 2019. Coastal and marine management strategy. Australia.
  28. Guam department of agriculture. 2017. Guam marine conservation plan. Guam.
  29. Park GY, Hong JW. 2018. Analysis of the contents of the act on the development, management, etc. of marinas using semantic network analysis. Journal of Korea Society of Marine Environment & Safety. 24(2): 163-170. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.2.163
  30. Pauna VH, Buonocore E, Renzi M, Russo GF, Franzese PP. 2019. The issue of microplastics in marine ecosystems: A bibliometric network analysis. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 149: 1-7.
  31. PEMSEA. 2018. SDS-SEA implementation plan 2018-2022. Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia.
  32. Song MG, Cha YD, Yeo GT. 2017. An analysis of the international maritime transportation focusing on maersk line container networks. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association. 33(2): 1-18. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.38121/kpea.2017.06.33.2.1
  33. Stefan G, Francisca RM, Rodrigo A, Barbara C. 2018. Assessing the implementation of marine ecosystem based management into national policies: Insights from agenda setting and policy responses. Marine Policy. 92: 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.017
  34. Yoon SR. 2018. Change of national environmental consciousness and review of the legislation on marine ecosystem - Focused on opposing perspective on conservation and development in Korea society. 2018. Ocean Policy Research. 33(1): 193-214. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.35372/kmiopr.2018.33.1.008
  35. Yoon SR. 2019. New approach to international legal instruments on the conservation of marine ecosystem and integration of the legislations in Korea. Journal of Hongik Law Review. 20(4): 89-117. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.16960/JHLR.20.4.201912.89