Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14249/eia.2021.30.1.24

Network Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Marine Ecosystem Management Plans  

Jeong, Sehwa (Pukyong National University)
Kim, Yeongha (Dong-A University)
Yeo, Unsang (Busan Development Institute)
Sung, Kijune (Pukyong National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment / v.30, no.1, 2021 , pp. 24-34 More about this Journal
Abstract
Many countries have established and implemented marine ecosystem management plans to solve various problems arising from excessive development and use of marine and coastal areas. In this study, network analysis was applied to compare and understand marine ecosystem management's direction and characteristics in Korea and other maritime countries. The results showed that the words 'strengthen,' 'promote,' 'improve,' and 'establish' were the keywords used a lot in domestic and foreign marine ecosystem management plans. Establishing a foundation for marine ecosystem management, establishing international cooperation and partnerships, and strengthening climate change adaptation was commonly included. However, there were some differences in detailed management plans. In foreign countries, it aims to present management measures for certain species and improve the existing institutional foundation. Still, in Korea, it aims to strengthen the comprehensive management of marine life and establish an institutional foundation for marine ecosystems. This study is expected to help understand the direction of domestic and overseas marine ecosystem management and establish a domestic marine ecosystem management plan in the future.
Keywords
Marine ecosystem; Management plan; Keyword analysis; Network analysis; Centrality Analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 An DH, Kim JI. 2018. Proposing policy for the prevention of marine pollution from microplastics. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration. 26(3): 77-102. [Korean Literature]   DOI
2 Bae HM. 2019. A discussion from a new perspective on island policy and management in Korea. The Journal of Korean Island. 31(1): 1-14. [Korean Literature]
3 Cabinet Decision of Japan. 2018. The third basic plan on ocean policy. Japan.
4 Chang IH. 2016. A study on rational improvement plan of marine ranching system for sustainable use of fishery resources. Law & Policy Review. 22(2): 223-253. [Korean Literature]   DOI
5 Cho JN. 2011. A study for research area of library and information science by network text analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management. 28(4): 65-83. [Korean Literature]   DOI
6 David CS, Elizabeth AF, Petrina A, Ian DC, Bronwyn MG, Marcus H, Keith JS, Anthony DMS, Joanna V, Tim MW. 2017. Implementing marine ecosystem-based management: lessons from Australia. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 74(7): 1990-2003.   DOI
7 Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC). 2012. Placentia Bay/Grand Banks large ocean management area. Canada.
8 Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC). 2013. Gulf of St.Lawrence integrated management plan. Canada.
9 Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC). 2014. Regional oceans plan: Scotian shelf, Atlantic coast, bay of Fundy. Canada.
10 Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC). 2017. Pacific north coast integrated management area plan. Canada.
11 Government of United States. 2010. Final recommendations of the interagency ocean policy task force. United States.
12 Heo G. 2020. A study on the research trends on the marine policy through network analysis in recent 11 years. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education. 32(2): 594-606. [Korean Literature]   DOI
13 Jeon JW, Wang Y, Yeo GT. 2016. SNA approach for analyzing the research trend of international port competition. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 32(3): 165-172.   DOI
14 Kho JC, Cho KT, Cho YH. 2013. A study on recent research trend in management of technology using keywords network analysis. Korea Intelligent Information Systems Society. 19(2): 101-123. [Korean Literature]   DOI
15 Kim BR, Lee JH, Kwon HS. 2017. Recent ecological asset research trends using keyword network analysis. Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment. 26(5): 303-314. [Korean Literature]
16 Kim HK, Kwon KS, Jang DH. 2016. Language network analysis of 'Marine environment' in news frame. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 16(5): 385-398. [Korean Literature]   DOI
17 KMA: Comprehensive Climate Change Monitoring Information [Internet]. 2020. Korea Meteorological Administration; [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: http://www.climate.go.kr/home/09_monitoring/main.
18 Lee HJ, Sung KJ. 2018. Analysis of domestic and foreign Local Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plan (LBSAP) using semantic network analysis. Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment. 27(1): 92-104. [Korean Literature]
19 Lee SS. 2013. A content analysis of journal articles using the language network analysis methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management. 31(4): 49-68. [Korean Literature]   DOI
20 Lee SY. 2016. Marine living resources conservation and international fishery law. Hannam Journal of Law & Technology. 22(1): 199-238. [Korean Literature]   DOI
21 Lee WK, Lee DS. 2014. A study on the directions of marine tourism policy through the analysis of marine tourism development policy in Korea. The Journal of Korean Island. 26(1): 69-97. [Korean Literature]
22 Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF). 2019. 2nd Master plan for conservation an management of marine ecosystem [Korean Literature]
23 Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Body (RPB). 2016. Mid-Atlantic regional ocean action plan. United States.
24 Northeast Regional Planning Body (RPB). 2016. Northeast ocean plan. United States.
25 Marine Estate Management Authority (MEMA). 2018. NSW marine estate management strategy. Australia.
26 Northern Territory (NT). 2019. Coastal and marine management strategy. Australia.
27 Guam department of agriculture. 2017. Guam marine conservation plan. Guam.
28 Park GY, Hong JW. 2018. Analysis of the contents of the act on the development, management, etc. of marinas using semantic network analysis. Journal of Korea Society of Marine Environment & Safety. 24(2): 163-170. [Korean Literature]   DOI
29 Pauna VH, Buonocore E, Renzi M, Russo GF, Franzese PP. 2019. The issue of microplastics in marine ecosystems: A bibliometric network analysis. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 149: 1-7.
30 PEMSEA. 2018. SDS-SEA implementation plan 2018-2022. Partnerships in Environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia.
31 Song MG, Cha YD, Yeo GT. 2017. An analysis of the international maritime transportation focusing on maersk line container networks. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association. 33(2): 1-18. [Korean Literature]   DOI
32 Stefan G, Francisca RM, Rodrigo A, Barbara C. 2018. Assessing the implementation of marine ecosystem based management into national policies: Insights from agenda setting and policy responses. Marine Policy. 92: 40-47.   DOI
33 National Ocean Council (NOC). 2013. National ocean policy implementation plan. United States.
34 Yoon SR. 2018. Change of national environmental consciousness and review of the legislation on marine ecosystem - Focused on opposing perspective on conservation and development in Korea society. 2018. Ocean Policy Research. 33(1): 193-214. [Korean Literature]   DOI
35 Yoon SR. 2019. New approach to international legal instruments on the conservation of marine ecosystem and integration of the legislations in Korea. Journal of Hongik Law Review. 20(4): 89-117. [Korean Literature]   DOI