한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제12권3호
  • /
  • Pages.151-164
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예술대학 교육환경 속 갈등관계에 따른 자기검열 연구: 귀인이론을 중심으로

A Study on Self-Censorship by Conflict in the Educational Environment of Art College: Based on the attribution theory.

  • 김광철 (세한대학교 실용음악학부) ;
  • 송진호 (중앙대학교 예술대학원 예술경영)
  • Kim, Kwang-Cheol (The Faculty of Practical Music, Sehan University) ;
  • Song, Jin-Ho (Department of Arts Management, Graduate School of art, Chung-Ang University)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.12
  • 심사 : 2021.03.20
  • 발행 : 2021.03.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 예술대학 교육과정 중 나타나는 갈등관계와 자기검열 행동동기의 원인이 되는 귀인성향을 검증하고자 하였다. 국내외 문헌 연구와 심층면담을 실시하여 설문지와 연구모형을 개발하였으며, 서울, 충남 소재 2개 대학교 예술학과 재학생 158명을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였다. 분석은 다중 회귀분석을 실행하여 유의성을 확인하였고 유의하게 나타난 요인에 대해 매개효과 분석하였다. 분석결과 자기검열과 개인간 갈등관계에 대한 외적귀인 성향이 부분 매개효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 예술대학생은 교육환경 속 갈등의 정도가 높아질수록 문제의 원인을 타인, 과제 난이도 등의 외적특성으로 지각하고 좌절감, 수치심의 정서가 자기검열의 행동동기가 된다는 결론을 확인하였다. 예술교육은 개인의 창의성을 기초로 하는 것으로 외부 억압과 자기검열은 자유로운 표현을 제한하는 학습장애가 될 수 있다. 따라서 교육과정 속 표현의 제한을 두지 않고 역량을 발휘하는 교육과정과 자유로운 창작환경을 제공하는 것으로 예술 대학생의 자기검열을 줄여나갈 필요가 있다.

This study aimed to find ways to reduce self-censorship by identifying the conflict and attribution to the motivation for self-censorship during the curriculum of the College of Arts. The analysis confirmed the significance of each relationship by conducting a correlation and regression analysis between the variables, and the analysis of the effects was based on the significant factors among them. The analysis showed the external locus of control toward self-censorship and interpersonal conflict had a partial mediation effect. In other words, as the degree of conflict in the educational environment increases, art college students are aware of the cause of the problem due to external characteristics such as others, task difficulty, etc., and thus confirmed the conclusion that frustration and shame caused by it become the motive for self-censorship.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A. F. Hayes, B. Uldall & C. Glynn. (2010). Validating the Willingness to Self-Censor Scale II: Inhibition of Opinion Expression in a Conversational Setting. COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 4(3), 256-272. DOI : 10.1080/19312458.2010.505503.
  2. J. K. Lee. (2017). An empirical study on the chilling effect, the enemy of the freedom of expression, on college students: a focus on the determinants of the chilling effect on expressions about sociopolitical campus and issues online and off-line. Journal of Media and Defamation La, 3(2), 169-203.
  3. D. Bar-Tal. (2017). Self-Censorship as a Socio-Political-Psychological Phenomenon: Conception and Research. Political Psychology, 38(1), 37-65. DOI : 10.1111/pops.12391.
  4. A. Roberts & R. Nason. (2011). Nobody says no: Student self-censorship in a collaborative knowledge building activity. Journal of Learning Design, 4(4) 56-68. DOI : 10.5204/jld.v4i4.89.
  5. B. Yesil. (2014). Press Censorship in Turkey: Networks of State Power, Commercial Pressures, and Self-Censorship, Communication. Culture and Critique, 7(2), 154-173. DOI : 10.1111/cccr.12049.
  6. A. F. Hayes, C. J. Glynn & J. Shanahan. (2005). Willingness to Self-Censor: A Construct and Measurement Tool for Public Opinion Research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 298-323. DOI : 10.1093/ijpor/edh073.
  7. H. J. Cho. (2017). Conceptualizing Self-Censorship as a Press Control. Journal of Communication Research 54(3), 41-72. DOI : 10.22174/jcr.2017.54.3.41.
  8. J. Horton. (2011). Self-censorhip. Res Publica, 17(1), 91-106. DOI : 10.1007/s11158-011-9145-3.
  9. A. F. Hayes. (2007). Exploring the Forms of Self-Censorship: On the Spiral of Silence and the Use of Opinion Expression Avoidance Strategies. Journal of communication, 57(4), 785-802. DOI : 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00368.x.
  10. A. Sillars & R. M. McLaren. (2015). Attribution in Conflict. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication. 1-6 DOI : 10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic113.
  11. S. D. Williams. (2002). Self-esteem and the self-censorship of creative ideas. Personnel Review, 31(4), 495-503. DOI : 10.1108/00483480210430391.
  12. F. J. Milliken, E. W. Morrison & P. F. Hewlin. (2003). An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don't Communicate Upward and Why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453-1476. DOI : 10.1111/1467-6486.00387.
  13. L. Perlow. (2003). When you say "yes" but mean "no": How silencing conflict wrecks relationships and companies. New York: Random House.
  14. RUTH COMERFORD. (2020). Culture of self-censorship in the arts revealed by survey. THE STAGE. https://www.thestage.co.uk/
  15. M. H. Paek. (2017). A Study on the Curriculum of the College of Fine Arts(Seoul National University) from the Viewpoint of Vocational Education. The Korean Journal of Arts Education, 15(4), 109-131.
  16. J. Y. Choi & B. S. Rhee. (2009). Examining Factors Related to College Students Learning Outcomes: Focusing on Effects of College. The Journal of Educational Administration, 27(1), 199-222.
  17. B. J. Kim & H. S. Lee. (2014). An Analysis of Difference in Conflict Management Style by Type of Interpersonal Conflict. The Research Institute of Future Industry, 38(2), 27-44.
  18. L. R. Pondy. (1967). Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(2), 296-320. DOI : 10.2307/2391553.
  19. O. B. Sayeed. (2001). Organizational commitment and conflict: Studies in healthy organizational processes. Sage Publications.
  20. R. L. Pinkley. (1990). Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 117-126. DOI : 10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.117
  21. M. A. Rahim. (2017). Managing Conflict in Organizations. DOI : 10.4324/9780203786482.
  22. T. Greitemeyer & B. Weiner. (2003). Asymmetrical Attributions for Approach Versus Avoidance Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1371-1382. DOI : 10.1037/e633962013-423.
  23. Y. H. Kang. (2017). A Attribution Theory for Subjective Happiness. Journal of Learning Strategy Intervention, 8(1), 23-45.
  24. F. Heider. (2013). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. DOI : 10.4324/9780203781159.
  25. B. Weiner. (1980). The Role of Affect in Rational (Attributional) Approaches to Human Motivation. Educational Researcher, 9(7), 4-11. DOI : 10.3102/0013189X009007004.
  26. S. H. Lee & Y. W. Suh. (2015). The Effects of Disagreement, Interference, Negative Emotion on the Transference of Conflict. Korean Psychological Association, 28(3), 481-506.
  27. J. B. Rotter. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092976.
  28. B. Weiner. (1986). An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. In: An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1_6.
  29. J. Thompson. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York:McGraw-Hill.
  30. K. W. Thomas. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265-274. DOI : 10.1002/job.4030130307.
  31. S. H. Kim. (2006). The study of individual value related to conflict perception, job performance and member satisfaction: attribution style and emotional competence. Master dissertation, University of Korea, Seoul.
  32. S. R. Oh. (1998). The correlations among internal locus of conrtol, school-related adjustment, and academic achievement. Master dissertation, University of Hongik, Seoul.
  33. B. Weiner. (1986). Beyond Achievement Motivation: The Generality of Attribution Theory. In: An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1_7.
  34. K. A. Jehn. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282. DOI : 10.2307/2393638.
  35. G. Y. Kim. (1999). A Study on Ego-identily and Locus of Contol Relation of College Students. Conflicth. Master dissertation, University of Woosuk, Seoul.
  36. Y. B. Kim. (2003). A Study on Causes And Types Of Organizational Conflict. Master dissertation. University of DanKook, Seoul.
  37. K. Seally. (2016). Self-Censorship in Museums: The Case of Sex: A Tell-all Exhibition. Graduate Student Journal of the Faculty of Information, 1(2). Retrieved from https://theijournal.ca/index.php/ijournal/article/view/27076.