한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

독서감상 표현을 위한 체크리스트 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on Checklist Development of Articulating Reading Appreciation

  • 이수상 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 임여주 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 주소현 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.22
  • 심사 : 2021.12.13
  • 발행 : 2021.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 도서관 이용자에게 맞춤형 도서를 추천하기 위한 기초 데이터 수집의 한 방편으로 '독서감상 표현을 위한 체크리스트'를 개발하였다. 감상은 이해가 선행되는 작업이므로, 읽기이해력 관련 논문을 분석하여 읽기이해의 하위 요소를 범주화하고, 독자반응이론과 리터러시 교육을 실제 독서교육 현장에 적용한 논문들에서 독서 후 질문 구성에 참조가 되는 단어와 구문을 추출하여 문장의 형태로 문항을 구성하였다. 개발된 문항들은 독서지도 전문가들의 검토를 거쳐 수정, 보완되었으며, 사실·추론적 이해 관련 문항 4개, 평가적 이해 관련 문항 3개, 감상적 이해 관련 문항 7개, 총 14개의 문항으로 구성된 체크리스트가 최종 완성되었다.

This study focuses on the development of checklist on articulating reading appreciation, which will be used as the initial data for book recommendation for library users. As reading comprehension is prerequisite for reading appreciation, researchers analyzed research articles on reading comprehension to find out the core factors on reading comprehension and categorize them. Studies on reader response theory and literacy education were also examined: key words and phrases that will stimulate readers' response to reading were extracted and formed as questions. These questions were reviewed by experts on reading education. The final checklist consists of 14 questions - 4 questions on literal·inferential comprehension, 3 on evaluative comprehension, and 3 on appreciative comprehension.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 2021년도 공공 클라우드 플래그십 프로젝트-두드림시스템 위탁과제로 지원받은 연구임.

참고문헌

  1. Cho, Hyun-Yang (2017). A experimental study on the development of a book recommendation system using automatic classification, based on the personality type. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(2), 215-236. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.48.2.201706.215
  2. Cho, Hyun-Yang & Cho, Mi-Ah (2018). The effect of providing books to elementary school students according to their personality type on their reading attitude: focused on the relationship between school happiness and reading tendency. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.49.1.201803.23
  3. Choi, In-Ja (2008). A study on the principle of context-centered literary education-in view of the social-cultural reading model. Korean Literature Education Research, 25, 427-450.
  4. Chung, Heechung & Cho, Sung-Bae (2011). Personalized recommendation service based on collaborative filtering for library information systems. Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference, 38(1A), 251-254.
  5. Hong, Yeon-Kyoung, Jeon, Seo-Young, Choi, Jae-Young, Yang, Hee-Yoon, Han, CHae-Eun, & Zhu, Yong-Jun (2021). A study on the development and evaluation of personalized book recommendation systems in university libraries based on individual loan records. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 38(2), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.2.113
  6. Hwang, Jae-woong (2008). A study on corelation between context-based reading and text types: focused on non-literary texts. Cheongram Korean Language Education Association, 38, 309-337. https://doi.org/10.26589/jockle..38.200812.309
  7. Kim, Dong-Il, Kim, Hee-Ju, Shin, Hye-Yeon, Jang, Se-Young, Ahn, Sung-Jin, Lim, Hee-Jin, & Koh, Hye-Jung (2017). A validation study on basic academic skills assessment (BASA): reading comprehension. The Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(2), 1-20.
  8. Kim, Dong-Il, Lee, Jae-Ho, Jang, Se-young, An, Ye-Ji, Ahn, Su-Jin, & Hwang, Ji-Young (2017). Characteristic analysis on reading comprehension related assessments in South Korea. Asian Journal of Education, 18(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2017.03.18.1.121
  9. Kim, Seong-Hun, Roh, Yoon-Ju, & Kim, Mi-Ryung (2021). A narrative study on user satisfaction of book recommendation service based on association analysis. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(3), 287-311. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.52.3.202109.287
  10. Kwak, Woo-Jung, Noh, Young-Hee, Ahn, In-Ja, & Zhang, Jing-Jing (2019). A study on the customized services of university libraries according to MBTI personality types of college students. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 30(4), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2019.30.4.091
  11. Lee, Do-Young (2009). A design plan of reading evaluation framework. Jounal of Elementary Korean Education, 41, 211-235.
  12. Lee, Hak-Jun (2018). Development of special education paper review checklist. JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION & REHABILITION SCIENCE, 57(1), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.23944/Jsers.2018.03.57.1.11
  13. Lee, Jaeho (2016). The Analysis of Cognitive Profiles of Reading Comprehension with Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Students with Learning Disabilities. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University.
  14. Lee, Seoung-Young (2016). A method for criticism-oriented Korean language education of nonliterary texts. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 20(6), 500-510. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2016.20.6.500
  15. Lee, Soo-Sang (2016). A study on the analysis of semantic relation and category of the Korean emotion words. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.2.201606.51
  16. Park, Jong-Im, Choi, Sook-Ki, & Kim, Tae-Ho (2019). Development of empirically-derived and descriptor-based diagnostic (EDD) checklist for the cognitive diagnostic assessment in argumentative writing. Research on Writing, 41, 131-160.
  17. Park, Joo-Hong (2008). Development and application of checklist for the evaluation of international technology transfer: from the viewpoint of licensor. Koreanische Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 26(2), 57-82.
  18. Park, Soo-Jah (2011). Quotation expressions analysis on expository text book reports. Association of Korean Language Education Research, 40, 435-465. https://doi.org/10.20880/kler.2011..40.435
  19. Shin, Myung-Sun & An, Kyounga (2018). A educational consideration about the genre's specificity of reading report. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(2), 595-614. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.2.595
  20. Shin, Won-Chul, KIM, Na-Rae, So, Min-Jeong, Sohn, Nam-Ho, Lee, Kang-Jae, Lee, Mi-Kyoung, Yi, Yeon-Sook, & Kim, Sok-Yong (2020). A study on the development of an evaluative checklist for chinese language learning Apps. CHINESE LITERATURE, 104, 127-154. https://doi.org/10.21192/SCLL.104..202008.006
  21. ACADEMIA (2021). Alan Js. The Barrett Taxonomy of Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Reading Comprehension. Available: https://independent.academia.edu/ElanJs
  22. Azabdaftari, B. (2013). An explication of concordance between man's mental structure and the narrative structure in the light of Vygotsky's SCT. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 45-51.
  23. Basaraba, D., Yovanoff. P., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2013). Examining the structure of reading comprehension: do literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension truly exist?. Reading and Writing, 26(2), 349-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9372-9
  24. Cunningham, P. M., Moore, S. A., Cunningham, J. W., & Moore, D. W. (1995). Reading and Writing in Elementary Classrooms: Skills and Observations (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  25. Dole, J., Duffy, G., Roehler, L., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002239
  26. Fielding, L. G. & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Reading comprehension: what works. Educational Leadership, 31, 62-68.
  27. Fitzpatrick, K. (1994). Improving reading comprehension using critical thinking skills. Reading Improvement, 31, 142-144.
  28. Flint, L. & Sluys, V. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: the journey of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382-392.
  29. Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Bruning, R. H. (1990). Cognitive Psychology for Teachers. New York: MacMillian.
  30. Gunning, T. G. (1996). Creating Reading Instruction for All Children. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  31. McCarthy, K. S. & Goldman, S. R. (2019). Constructing interpretive inferences about literary text: the role of domain-specific knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 60, 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.004
  32. McLaughlin, M. & DeVoogd, G. (2019). Critical expressionism: expanding reader response in critical literacy. The Reading Teacher, 73(5), 587-595. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1878
  33. Moyer, J. E. & Stover, K. M. (2010). The Readers' Advisory Handbook. American Library Association.
  34. Oxford University Press (2021). Barrett's Taxonomy. Available: https://www.oxfordowl.com.au/
  35. Reutzel, D. R. & Cooter, R. B. (1996). Teaching Children to Read. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  36. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  37. Rosenblatt, L. M. (1982). The literary transaction: evocation and response. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 268-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848209543018
  38. Spratford, B. (2007). Welcome to RA for All. Available: http://raforall.blogspot.com/p/about.html
  39. VICTORIA State Government. Education and Training (2019). Comprehension. Available: https://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/english/literacy/readingviewing/Pages/litfocuscomprehension.aspx#link100
  40. Gocer, A. (2014). The assessment of Turkish written examination questions based on the text in accordance with the Barrett's taxonomy. Online Submission, 3, 1-16.