한국도서관정보학회지 (Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society)

한국도서관정보학회 (Korean Library and Information Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 정보격차 관련 국내 연구 동향 분석

Research Trend Analysis of Digital Divide in South Korea

  • 고정현 (경북대학교 문헌정보학과 BK21 Four 교육연구팀) ;
  • 강우진 (경북대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이종욱 (경북대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.11.23
  • 심사 : 2021.12.08
  • 발행 : 2021.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 디지털 정보격차 관련 국내 연구의 주요 이슈와 경향을 살펴보는 것이다. 이를 위해 2003년부터 2020년까지의 관련 논문 488건을 대상으로 연도별 논문 건수과 학술지 주제 영역을 분석하였으며, 추가적으로 토픽모델링과 단어네트워크 분석을 통해 연구 주제를 파악하였다. 분석 결과를 살펴보면, 첫째, 2007년까지 논문 건수가 증가하다가 이후 10년간 증감을 반복한 후 2019년부터 급증하는 것으로 나타났으며, 둘째, 사회과학, 복합학, 공학, 예술체육학 등 다양한 학문분야에서 연구가 이뤄지고 있으나, 최근 연구를 주도하는 분야는 사회과학과 복합학 분야인 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 토픽모델링과 단어 네트워크 분석을 통해 연구의 주제는 '지역 간 디지털 정보격차', '장애인 디지털 정보격차', '디지털 정보격차의 기술적 환경', '디지털 정보 활용과 영향 격차', '디지털 정보격차의 법·제도적 환경', '노인 디지털 정보격차' 등 6개로 분류되었다. 넷째, 최근 들어 '디지털 정보 활용과 영향 격차', '디지털 정보격차의 기술적 환경'에 관련된 주제가 관심을 많이 받고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

This study aims to grasp the key issues and the direction for digital divide research in South Korea. Based on the 488 KCI journal articles published between 2003 and 2020, the authors analyzed the changes in the number of articles per year and the subject areas of journals. Furthermore, the topic modelling and keyword network anlaysis were applied to identify the subjects of research. The main findings can be summarized as follows: first, there was a stable trend for a while after the number of articles had increased by the year of 2007, and then there has been a sharp increase since 2019. Second, digital divide research has been conducted from diverse fields including social science, multidiscipline, and engineering. Third, the six subject areas were identified which are 'digital divide among regions', 'digital divide among people with disabilities', 'technical environment of digital divide', 'divide from information use and its consequence', 'legal and institutional environments of digital divide', and 'digital divide of the elderly'. Finally, it was shown that the areas of 'divide from information use and its consequence' and 'technical environment of digital divide' have attracted attention recently.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beak, Song Yi, Park, Kiwoong, Ko, Saron, & Kye, Bokyung (2020). An analysis of international research trends of digital inclusion using text mining. The Journal of Research in Education, 33(4), 277-306.
  2. Framework Act On Intelligent Informatization. Act No. 17344.
  3. Hong, Soon Goo, Kang, Young Moo, Lee, Hyun Mi, & Cha, Yoon Sook (2011). Web accessibility education trends and discussion to vitalize a web accessibility education. Journal of the Korea Society Industrial Information System, 16(3), 73-87.
  4. Hwang, Hyun Jeong & Hwang, Yong Suk (2017). Gaps and reasons of digital divide within the elderly in Korea: focusing on household composition. The Journal of Social Science, 24(3), 359-386. https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2017.09.24.3.359
  5. Information and Communication Strategy Committee (2018). The 6th National Informatization Basic Plan (2018-2022) for the Realization of an Intelligent Information Society.
  6. Jeong, Yoo Kyung (2020). An analysis on research trends of digital humanities. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(2), 311-331. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.311
  7. Joint Ministries (2020). Digital inclusion promotion plan to realize an innovative inclusive nation.
  8. Jung, Woo Yeoul & Son, Neung Su (2007). A study on the performance evaluation of the information network village. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 10(3), 19-43.
  9. Lee, Hong-Jae, Yoo, So-Young, & Cha, Yong Jin (2014). A review on the operational evaluation of information village: focusing on the 2012 quantitative evaluation model and indicators. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 17(1), 73-92.
  10. Lee, Seongsin, Kang, Bora, & Lee, Sena (2019). A study on the information divide research trends: comparative analysis of LIS fields and other social science fields. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(3), 139-166. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.3.201909.139
  11. Ministry of Science and ICT (2020). 2020 The Report on the Digital Divide.
  12. Ministry of Science and ICT (2021). 2020 Survey on the Internet Usage.
  13. Na, Woon Hwan (2018). The 4th industrial revolution and job transition of the people with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22, 23-39.
  14. Kang, Yun Ju & Na, Woon Hwan (2007). Fact-finding study for the operation of informatization educational institutes for the disabled. Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 11(4), 79-108.
  15. Kim, Bong Seob & Kim, Jeong Mi (2009). A study on digital divide trigger factor of older people: focused on technology acceptance model. Journal of Social Science, 35(2), 193-222. https://doi.org/10.15820/khjss.2009.35.2.008
  16. Kim, Najeong (2020). Measures to resolve the information gap in non-face-to-face society (Issues and Perspectives No. 1774), National Assembly Research Service.
  17. Kim, Kyong-Tae (2010). The concept of universal service in korean social security law. Journal of Law, 21(2), 313-360.
  18. Ko, Jeonghyeun (2021). The Effect of Social and Psychological Factors of the Elderly on the Quality and Outcomes of Information us. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Public Administration Graduate School, Kyungpook National University.
  19. Ko, Jeonghyeun & Park, Sunjoo (2020). The impact of social support on the digital usage among the elderly: focused on the mediating effect of digital motivation. Public Policy Review, 34(2), 121-149. https://doi.org/10.17327/IPPA.2020.34.2.005
  20. Park, Jahyun & Song, Min (2013). A study on the research trends in library & information science in Korea using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007
  21. Park, Jong Do (2019). A study on issue tracking on multi-cultural studies using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.273
  22. Seo, Hye Ock & Gim, Bo Hyeon (2019). Propose the need for kiosk system box instructions for information accessibility: Incheon movie theaters, wheelchair users. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture, 25(2), 279-287. https://doi.org/10.18208/ksdc.2019.25.2.279
  23. Seo, Hyung Jun & Myeong, Seung Hwan (2016). Research trends and issues on digital divide: focusing on Korean journals. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 19(4), 151-187.
  24. Seo, Jin-Wan, Lee, Mi Ru, & HEO, JIN HEE (2013). Government efforts and policy change for digital divide. Modern Society and Public Administration, 23, 45-74.
  25. Shin, Seungyun & Eom, Seok-Jin (2019). A study on influencing factors on mobile internet use of marriage immigrants in Korea. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 22(2), 73-109.
  26. Sohn, Seung Hye, Choi, Yun Jung, & Hwang, Ha Sung (2011). Understanding acceptance of smartphone among early adopters using extended technology acceptance model. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 55(2), 227-251.
  27. Andreasson, K. (2015). Digital Divides: The New Challenges and Opportunities of e-Inclusion. Florida: CRC Press.
  28. Blei, D. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Commun, ACM 55(4), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
  29. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
  30. Cheang, L. S. & Lei, G. (2015). Digital Inclusion: the Singapore Perspective. In Digital Divides. New York: Routledge, 149-162.
  31. Haan, J. D. (2004). A multifaceted dynamic model of the digital divide. IT & Society, 1(7), 66-88.
  32. Helsper, E. (2008). Digital Inclusion: An Analysis of Social Disadvantage and the Information Society. Department for Communities and Local Government.
  33. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1995). Falling Through the Net: A survey of the "have nots" in rural and urban America.
  34. Ragnedda, M. (2017). The Third Digital Divide: A Weberian Approach to Digital Inequalities. New York: Routledge.
  35. Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes: a systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007
  36. Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6, 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519
  37. van Deursen, A. & Helsper, E. (2015). The third-level digital divide: who benefits most from being online?. Communication and Information Technologies Annual: Digital Distinctions and Inequalities Studies in Media and Communications, 10, 29-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
  38. van Dijk, J. (2020). The Digital Divide. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  39. World Bank (2016). World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends.