Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of thickness and background on the masking ability of high-trasnlucent zirconias

고투명도 지르코니아의 두께 및 하부 배경에 따른 색조 차단 효과

  • Kim, Young-Gon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jung, Ji-Hye (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kong, Hyun-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yu-Lee (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 김영곤 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 정지혜 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 공현준 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김유리 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2021.07.30
  • Accepted : 2021.10.02
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the masking ability of three types of high translucent zirconia according to the various thicknesses and backgrounds. Materials and Methods: Using three types of high-translucency zirconia (Ceramill zolid fx white, Ceramill zolid ht+ white, Ceramill zolid ht+ preshade A2), 10 cylindrical specimens were fabricated in 10mm diameter and each with four thicknesses (0.6 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm), respectively by CAD/CAM method. The background was 10 mm in diameter and 10 mm in thickness. A1, A2, A3 flowable resin backgrounds, blue-colored core resin background, and Ni-Cr alloy background were prepared, and black, white backgrounds provided by the spectrophotometer manufacturer (x-rite, Koblach, Austria) were used. zirconia specimens and the background specimen were stacked to measure L, a*, b* with Spectrophotometer (Color i5, x-rite, Koblach, Austria) and the ΔE value with the other background is calculated. The Calculated mean ΔE values were compared based on perceptibility threshold 1.0 and acceptability threshold 3.7. Nonparametric tests such as Kruskal-Wallis test were performed to verify statistical significance (α = 0.05). Results: There was a significant difference in the mean ΔE value according to the zirconia type, background and thickness change (P = 0.000). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, the pre-colored high-translucent zirconia can obtain the desired zirconia shade when it is restored on teeth, composite resins, and abutments except for the blue resin core.

목적: 이 연구의 목적은 고투명도 3종류의 지르코니아의 두께 및 하부 배경에 따른 색조 차단 효과를 비교, 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 3 종류의 고투명도 지르코니아(Ceramill zolid fx white, Ceramill zolid ht+ white, Ceramill zolid ht+ preshade A2)를 각각 CAD/CAM 방식으로 직경 10 mm의 원판 형태의 4가지 두께(0.6 mm, 1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm)로 10개씩 시편을 제작하였다. 하부 배경은 직경 10 mm, 두께 10 mm로 A1, A2, A3 레진 하부 배경, 청색의 코어 레진 하부 배경, Ni-Cr 합금 하부 배경을 제작하였으며, 추가로 분광 광도계 제조사에서 제공하는 검정색 및 흰색 하부 배경을 사용하였다. 지르코니아 시편과 기준 배경을 접착제없이 겹쳐 분광 광도계로 L, a*, b* 값을 측정하고 다른 하부 배경과의 ΔE 값을 계산하였다. 계산된 평균 ΔE 값을 인지 한계 1.0과 허용 한계 3.7 값을 기준으로 색조 차단 효과를 비교하였다. 통계적 유의성 검증을 위해 비모수 검정인 Kruskal-Wallis 검정을 시행하였다(α = 0.05). 결과: 지르코니아 종류, 하부 배경 및 두께 변화에 따른 평균 ΔE 값의 유의한 차이를 보였다(P = 0.000). 결론: 본 연구 결과에 의하면, 색조를 가지는 고투명도 지르코니아는 청색 레진 코어를 제외한 치아, 복합레진 및 지대주상에 수복될 때 원하는 지르코니아 색조를 얻을 수 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by Wonkwang University in 2021.

References

  1. Raptis NV, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H. Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:31-41.
  2. Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelainfused- to-metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater 2011;27:83-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.024
  3. Jeong ID, Bae SY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Translucency of zirconia-based pressable ceramics with different core and veneer thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:768-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.003
  4. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: A review. Dent Mater 2011;27:97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.018
  5. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:4-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.126794
  6. Al Ben Ali A, Kang K, Finkelman MD, Zandparsa R, Hirayama H. The effect of variations in translucency and background on color differences in CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass ceramics. J Prosthodont 2014;23:213-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12080
  7. Tabatabaian F, Taghizade F, Namdari M. Effect of coping thickness and background type on the masking ability of a zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:159-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.009
  8. Brodbelt RH, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL. Translucency of Dental Porcelains. J Dent Res 1980;59:70-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590011101
  9. Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60333-9
  10. Kanchanavasita W, Triwatana P, Suputtamongkol K, Thanapitak A, Chatchaiganan M. Contrast Ratio of Six Zirconia-Based Dental Ceramics. J Prosthodont 2014;23:456-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12143
  11. Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, Ritter AV, Vallittu PK, Narhi TO, Lassila LV. Optical properties and light irradiance of monolithic zirconia at variable thicknesses. Dent Mater 2015;31:1180-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.016
  12. Baldissara P, Llukacej A, Ciocca L, Valandro FL, Scotti R. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:6-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60086-8
  13. Matsuzaki F, Sekine H, Honma S, Takanashi T, Furuya K, Yajima Y, Yoshinari M. Translucency and flexural strength of monolithic translucent zirconia and porcelain-layered zirconia. Dental Mater 2015;34:910-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.024
  14. Passos L, Linke B, Street A, Torrealba Y. Effect of thickness, translucency, and firing protocol on the masking ability of a CADCAM zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate for different backgrounds. Int J Comput Dent 2019;22:29-38.
  15. Spyropoulou PE, Giroux EC, Razzoog ME, Duff RE. Translucency of shaded zirconia core material. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:304-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60056-5
  16. Lim HN, Yu B, Lee YK. Spectroradiometric and spectrophotometric translucency of ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:239-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60131-X
  17. Lindsey DT, Wee AG. Perceptibility and acceptability of CIELAB color differences in computer-simulated teeth. J Dent 2007;35:593-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.03.006
  18. Ishikawa-Nagai S, Yoshida A, Sakai M, Kristiansen J, Da Silva JD. Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and allceramic crowns. J Dent 2009;37 Suppl 1:e57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.004
  19. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
  20. Khashayar G, Bain PA, Salari S, Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry. J Dent 2014;42:637-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.017
  21. Tabatabaian F, Shabani S, Namdari M, Sadeghpour K. Masking ability of a zirconia ceramic on composite resin substrate shades. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2017;14:389-94. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.218562
  22. Powers JM, Dennison JB, Lepeak PJ. Parameters that affect the color of direct restorative resins. J Dent Res 1978;57:876-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345780570090701
  23. Johnston WM, Ma T, Kienle BH. Translucency parameter of colorants for maxillofacial prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:79-86.
  24. Nassary Zadeh P, Lumkemann N, Sener B, Eichberger M, Stawarczyk B. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and translucency of cubic/tetragonal zirconia materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:948-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.021
  25. Oh SH, Kim SG. Effect of abutment shade, ceramic thickness, and coping type on the final shade of zirconia all-ceramic restorations: in vitro study of color masking ability. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:368-74. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.368
  26. Shimada K, Nakazawa M, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H. Influence of abutment materials on the resultant color of heat-pressed lithium disilicate ceramics. Dent Mater J 2006;25:20-5. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.20
  27. Sen N, Sermet IB, Cinar S. Effect of coloring and sintering on the translucency and biaxial strength of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:308. e1-7.
  28. Spyropoulou PE, Giroux EC, Razzoog ME, Duff RE. Translucency of shaded zirconia core material. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:304-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60056-5
  29. Tabatabaian F, Dalirani S, Namdari M. Effect of Thickness of Zirconia Ceramic on Its Masking Ability: An In Vitro Study. J Prosthodont 2019;28:666-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12625
  30. Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:37-42. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.37
  31. Malkondu O, Tinastepe N, Kazazoglu E. Influence of type of cement on the color and translucency of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:902-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.001
  32. Kurklu D, Azer SS, Yilmaz B, Johnston WM. Porcelain thickness and cement shade effects on the colour and translucency of porcelain veneering materials. J Dent 2013;41:1043-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.017
  33. Tabatabaian F, Habib Khodaei M, Namdari M, Mahshid M. Effect of cement type on the color attributes of a zirconia ceramic. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:449-56. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.449