Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Selection of Measurement Indicators by Spatial Levels for Ecosystem Services Assessment - Focused on the Provisioning Service -

생태계서비스 평가를 위한 공간 수준별 측정지표 선정 - 공급서비스를 중심으로 -

  • Jung, Pil-Mo (Team of Ecosystem Service, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kim, Jung-In (Team of Ecosystem Service, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Yeo, Inae (Department of Research Policy, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Joo, Wooyeong (National Institute of Ecology, Ecosystem Services) ;
  • Lee, Kyungeun (Team of Climate Change Research, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 정필모 (국립생태원 생태계서비스팀) ;
  • 김정인 (국립생태원 생태계서비스팀) ;
  • 여인애 (국립생태원 연구정책부) ;
  • 주우영 (국립생태원 생태계서비스팀) ;
  • 이경은 (국립생태원 기후변화연구팀)
  • Received : 2021.11.19
  • Accepted : 2021.12.20
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Provisioning service, which is one of the ecosystem service functions, means goods and services such as food and fuel that people get from ecosystem. Provisioning functions are closely related to the primary industry, a sector of economy. Excessive demand and use of human society can cause trade-offs among regulation, cultural, and supporting services. Therefore, it is important to perform evaluation ecosystem services periodically and to monitor the time series fluctuations to identify the impact of provisioning services on other ecosystem services (trade-off) and to maintain sustainable provisioning service. When it comes to the precise assessment of provisioning service, it is necessary to get the statistical data and standardize indicators and methods. In this study, indicators and methods, which are applicable to the spatial level of national-local-protected areas, were derived through literature analysis and expert survey. The result of this study implies that provisioning services measurement by spatial level improve the efficiency of the establishment of environmental conservation plans by whose purpose.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 국립생태원의 전략과제로 수행된 핵심 생태자산과 생태계서비스 가치평가 및 보전방안 연구(NIE-전략연구-2021-03)의 지원을 받아 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Ahn SE., Joo WY., Shin YJ., Jang J., Kwon HS., Kim CK., Kim HN., Seol AR., Lee HL., Choi WI., and Heo HY. 2020. Development of Korea National Ecosystem Assessment Framework to Support Decision Making.. Journal of environmental policy and administration. 28(2): 101-129. (in Korean with English summary)
  2. Bobylev S. N., Bukvareva E. N., Danilkin A. A., Dgebuadze Y. Y., Drozdov A. V., Filenko O. F., ... and Narykov A. N. 2018. Ecosystem services of Russia: prototype national report.
  3. Costanza R., d'Arge R., De Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., ... and Van Den Belt M. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387(6630): 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  4. De Groot R. 2006. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landscape and urban planning. 75(3-4): 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016
  5. De Knegt B. 2014. Graadmeter Diensten van Natuur: Vraag, aanbod, gebruik en trend van goederen en diensten uit ecosystemen in Nederland (No. 13). Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur and Milieu.
  6. European Commission. 2016. "Report on Phase 1 of the Knowledge Innovation Project on an Integrated System of Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Accounting in the EU (KIP-INCA Phase 1 Report)." 106.
  7. Grunewald K., Herold H., Marzelli S., Meinel G., Richter B., Syrbe R. U., and Walz U. 2016. Assessment of ecosystem services at the national level in Germany-Illustration of the concept and the development of indicators by way of the example wood provision. Ecological Indicators. 70: 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.010
  8. Grunewald K., Syrbe R. U., Walz U., Richter B., Meinel G., Herold H., and Marzelli S. 2017. Germany's ecosystem services-state of the indicator development for a nationwide assessment and monitoring. One ecosystem, 2, e14021. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e14021
  9. Haines-Young R. and Potschin M. 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. EEA Framework Contract No EEA/IEA/09/003.
  10. Haines-Young R., and Potschin M. B. 2018. Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) V5. 1 and guidance on the application of the revised structure.
  11. Ham EK., Kim M., and Chon JH. 2015. An analysis of ecosystem service's trade-off through systems thinking. Korean System Dynamics Review. 16(2): 75-100. (in Korean with English summary)
  12. Harrison P. A., Vandewalle M., Sykes M. T., Berry P. M., Bugter R., de Bello F., ... and Zobel M. 2010. Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodiversity and Conservation. 19(10): 2791-2821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x
  13. Hwang JH., and Lee SW. 2016. The 6 th industrialization complex type and the increase of farmers' income in agriculture. Journal of Rural Development. 39(4): 1-28. (in Korean with English summary)
  14. IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S. Diaz, J. Settele, E. S. Brondizio, H. T. Ngo, M. Gueze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. A. Brauman, S. H. M. Butchart, K. M. A. Chan, L. A. Garibaldi, K. Ichii, J. Liu, S. M. Subramanian, G. F. Midgley, P. Miloslavich, Z. Molnar, D. Obura, A. Pfaff, S. Polasky, A. Purvis, J. Razzaque, B. Reyers, R. Roy Chowdhury, Y. J. Shin, I. J. Visseren-Hamakers, K. J. Willis, and C. N. Zayas (eds.). IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 56 pages. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553579.
  15. Joo WY., Kwon HS., Jang IY., Bae HJ., Jung PM., Bang EJ., Kim JI., Kim S., Seo CW., and Choe JC. 2016a. Korea national ecosystem assessment - Indicators selection and evaluation of national ecosystem service evaluation. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean with English summary)
  16. Joo WY., Kwon HS., Jang IY., Jung PM., Kim MH., Park HJ., Kim JI., Park EJ., and Kim JK. 2017a. Establishment of ecosystem services assessment framework at National level. National Institute of Ecology.(in Korean with English summary)
  17. Joo WY., Kwon HS., Jang IY., Jung PM., Kim MH., Park HJ., Kim JI., Park EJ., Kim JG., and Lee HC. 2017b. A guideline for ecosystem services assessment. National Institute of Ecology.
  18. Joo WY., Kwon HS., Jang IY., Jung PM., Park HJ., Kim JI., Park EJ., and Kim JK. 2018. Assessment of key ecosystem assets and their services and development of conservation strategies. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean with English summary)
  19. Joo WY., Kwon HS., Lee KE., Choi TY., Kwon YS., Jung PM., Park HJ., Kim JI., Park HS., and Lee KC. 2020. Assessment of key ecosystem assets and ecosystem services for conservation planning. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean with English summary)
  20. Joo WY., Kwon HS., Yeo IA., Jang IY., Jung PM., Lee KC., Park HJ., Kim JI., and Seo CW. 2019. Assessment of key ecosystem assets and their services and development of conservation strategies. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean with English summary)
  21. Kim BR., Lee JH., Kim IK., Kim SH., and Kwon HS. 2019. Rapid assessment of ecosystem services apply to local stakeholders. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 22(1): 1-11. (in Korean with English)
  22. Kwon HS., Lee JH., Choi TY., Kim IK., Kim SH., Lee JE., Jun BS., Jeong DY., Joo WY., and Seo CW. 2019. A study on the evaluation and awareness of local ecological value. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean with English)
  23. Kwon HS., Lee JH., Kim IK., Kim SH., Kim BR., Jun BS., Lee JE., Joo WY., Park EJ., and Kim JK. 2018. A study on the evaluation and awareness of local ecological value. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean with English)
  24. Kwon HS., Lee JH., Kim IK., Kim SH., Kim BR., Kim HR., Jun BS., Lee JE., Oh HR., Joo WY., Park EJ., and Kim JK. 2017. Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean with English)
  25. Kwon HS., Lee JH., Kim SH., Kim BR., Kim HR., Joo WY., Jang IY., Lee KE., Bae HJ., Kim HJ., Seo CW., and Choe JC. 2016. Methodological development of ecosystem service assessment and valuation. National Institute of Ecology. (in Korean with English summary)
  26. La Notte A., Vallecillo S., Polce C., Zulian G., and Maes J. 2017. Implementing an EU system of accounting for ecosystems and their services. Initial proposals for the implementation of ecosystem services accounts, EUR, 28681, pp.1-124.
  27. Layke C., Mapendembe A., Brown C., Walpole M., and Winn J. 2012. Indicators from the global and sub-global Millennium Ecosystem Assessments: An analysis and next steps. Ecological Indicators. 17: 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.025
  28. Lim ES., and Hwang JY. 2013. Taxation of local income tax for primary industry. Korea Institute of Local Finance. Policy issue. 2013(16): 1-107.
  29. MA. 2005a. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC.
  30. MA. 2005b. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Chapter 1. MA conceptual Framework. pp.29.
  31. Maes J., Fabrega Domenech N., Zulian G., Lopes Barbosa A., Vizcaino Martinez M., Ivits E., and Lavalle C. 2015. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: Trends in ecosystems and ecosystem services in the European Union between 2000 and 2010. EUR 27143. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; JRC94889
  32. Maes J., Liquete Garcia M., Teller A., Erhard M., Paracchini M., Barredo Cano J., ... and Lavalle C. 2016. An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES. 17: 14-23. JRC91996 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
  33. Maes J., Teller A., Erhard M., Conde S., Vallecillo Rodriguez S., Barredo Cano J.I., Paracchini M., Malak D.A., Trombetti M., Vigiak O., Zulian G., Addamo A., Grizzetti B., Somma F., Hagyo A., Vogt P., Polce C., Jones A., Carre A. and Hauser R. 2021. EU Ecosystem Assessment. EUR 30599 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN 978-92-76-30614-6, doi:10.2760/846428, JRC123783.
  34. Mederly P., Cernecky J., Spulerova J., Izakovicova Z., Duricova V., Povazan R., ... and Laco I. 2020. National ecosystem services assessment in Slovakia-meeting old liabilities and introducing new methods. One Ecosystem. 5. e53677. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53677
  35. Mo Y., Park JH., Son YH., and Lee DK. 2016. Establishment of additional protected areas and applying payment for ecosystem services(PES) for sustainability of Suncheonman-bay. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 19(1): 171-184. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.171
  36. Mononen L., Auvinen A. P., Ahokumpu A. L., Ronka M., Aarras N., Tolvanen H., ... and Vihervaara P. 2016. National ecosystem service indicators: Measures of social-ecological sustainability. Ecological Indicators. 61: 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.041
  37. Park YS., Kim CK., and Lee WS. 2021. A study of useability of ecosystem service assessment on strategic environmental assessment. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 24(2): 115-126. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2021.24.2.115
  38. Preston S. M. 2017. Completing and using ecosystem service assessment for decision-making: an interdisciplinary toolkit for managers and analysts. Environment and Climate Change Canada.
  39. Statistics Korea. 2016. Korean standard industrial classification(2017).
  40. TEEB. 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. Edited by Pushpam Kumar, Earthscan: London and Washington.
  41. The Ministry of Environment (Japan). 2016. Japan Biodiversity Outlook 2 - Comprehensive evaluation report of biodiversity and ecosystem services.
  42. Turkelboom F., Thoonen M., Jacobs S., Martin-Lopez B., and P. Berry. 2016. Ecosystem Service Trade-offs and Synergies. Open NESS Ecosystem Services Reference Book.
  43. UK NEA. 2011. UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report. United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre. (Watson, R., Albon, S., Aspinall, R., Austen, M., Bardgett, B., Bateman, I., ... and Winter, M.)
  44. Wallace KJ. 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological conservation. 139(3-4): 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015