Acknowledgement
This study was a part of a research project in maxillofacial radiology (project number: 9810037323) that was supported by the Vice-Chancellor of Research and Technology, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran.
References
- Camardella LT, Ongkosuwito EM, Penning EW, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Vilella OV, Breuning KH. Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners. Korean J Orthod 2020; 50: 13-25. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.13
- De Luca Canto G, Pacheco-Pereira C, Lagravere MO, FloresMir C, Major PW. Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015; 18: 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12068
- Camardella LT, Breuning H, de Vasconcellos Vilella O. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner. J Orofac Orthop 2017; 78: 211-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0070-0
- Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x
- Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 140-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.018
- Ko HC, Liu W, Hou D, Torkan S, Spiekerman C, Huang GJ. Agreement of treatment recommendations based on digital vs plaster dental models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 155: 135-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.03.018
- Engelbrecht WP, Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO, Ren Y. The influence of the segmentation process on 3D measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1919-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0881-3
- Poleti ML, Fernandes TM, Moretti MR, Puzinato LR, Slaviero TV, Rubira-Bullen IR. Reliability and accuracy of automatic segmentation of mandibular 3D models on linear measurements. Clin Oral Investig (in press).
- Kim J, Heo G, Lagravere MO. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2014; 84: 443-50. https://doi.org/10.2319/051213-365.1
- El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 259-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.030
- Hirogaki Y, Sohmura T, Satoh H, Takahashi J, Takada K. Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20: 1093-101. https://doi.org/10.1109/42.959306
- Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM, Flores-Mir C, El-Bialy T, Carey JP, et al. Linear measurements using virtual study models. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 1098-106. https://doi.org/10.2319/110311-681.1
- Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Malfatto M, Di Corato F, Trovati F, Scribante A. Computerized casts for orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners: accuracy, execution time, and patient feedback. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 4103232
- Kim J, Lagravere MO. Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images. Korean J Orthod 2016; 46: 13-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.1.13
- Olszewski R, Szyper-Szczurowska J, Opach M, Bednarczyk P, Zapala J, Szczepanik S. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner. Adv Clin Exp Med 2019; 28: 1647-56. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/110318
- Reuschl RP, Heuer W, Stiesch M, Wenzel D, Dittmer MP. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 22-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv001
- Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 2008; 35: 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022626
- Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 149: 161-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.029
- Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CT. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 2009; 25: 97-103.
- Massaro C, Losada C, Cevidanes L, Yatabe M, Garib D, Lauris JR, et al. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res 2020; 23: 118-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12352
- Lagravere MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Threedimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 112-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.024
- Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 19-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016
- Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrao J, Miasiro Junior H, Sanchez-Ayala A, Lagravere MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23: 288-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300011
- Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr005
- Ye N, Jian F, Xue J, Wang S, Liao L, Huang W, et al. Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 879-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.020
- Creed B, Kau CH, English JD, Xia JJ, Lee RP. A comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod 2011; 17: 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.010
- Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N, Nguyen JT, Creed B. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 435-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/083109-491.1
- Lightheart KG, English JD, Kau CH, Akyalcin S, Bussa HI Jr, McGrory KR, et al. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 686-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.019
- Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 573-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.025