1 |
Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Tutein Nolthenius HE, van der Meer WJ, Ren Y. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 140-7.
DOI
|
2 |
Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Malfatto M, Di Corato F, Trovati F, Scribante A. Computerized casts for orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners: accuracy, execution time, and patient feedback. Biomed Res Int 2018; 2018: 4103232
|
3 |
Reuschl RP, Heuer W, Stiesch M, Wenzel D, Dittmer MP. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 22-6.
DOI
|
4 |
Naidu D, Scott J, Ong D, Ho CT. Validity, reliability and reproducibility of three methods used to measure tooth widths for bolton analyses. Aust Orthod J 2009; 25: 97-103.
|
5 |
Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 19-25.
DOI
|
6 |
Ye N, Jian F, Xue J, Wang S, Liao L, Huang W, et al. Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 879-87.
DOI
|
7 |
Lightheart KG, English JD, Kau CH, Akyalcin S, Bussa HI Jr, McGrory KR, et al. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 686-93.
DOI
|
8 |
Hirogaki Y, Sohmura T, Satoh H, Takahashi J, Takada K. Complete 3-D reconstruction of dental cast shape using perceptual grouping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001; 20: 1093-101.
DOI
|
9 |
De Luca Canto G, Pacheco-Pereira C, Lagravere MO, FloresMir C, Major PW. Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015; 18: 65-76.
DOI
|
10 |
Camardella LT, Ongkosuwito EM, Penning EW, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Vilella OV, Breuning KH. Accuracy and reliability of measurements performed using two different software programs on digital models generated using laser and computed tomography plaster model scanners. Korean J Orthod 2020; 50: 13-25.
DOI
|
11 |
El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional dental measurements: an alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 259-65.
DOI
|
12 |
Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrao J, Miasiro Junior H, Sanchez-Ayala A, Lagravere MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 2009; 23: 288-95.
DOI
|
13 |
Lagravere MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Threedimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 112-6.
DOI
|
14 |
Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 2008; 35: 191-201.
DOI
|
15 |
Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernardi CL. Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 149: 161-70.
DOI
|
16 |
Massaro C, Losada C, Cevidanes L, Yatabe M, Garib D, Lauris JR, et al. Comparison of linear and angular changes assessed in digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res 2020; 23: 118-28.
DOI
|
17 |
Ballrick JW, Palomo JM, Ruch E, Amberman BD, Hans MG. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 573-82.
DOI
|
18 |
Tarazona B, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 1-6.
DOI
|
19 |
Creed B, Kau CH, English JD, Xia JJ, Lee RP. A comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod 2011; 17: 49-56.
DOI
|
20 |
Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N, Nguyen JT, Creed B. Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 435-9.
DOI
|
21 |
Kim J, Lagravere MO. Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images. Korean J Orthod 2016; 46: 13-9.
DOI
|
22 |
Camardella LT, Breuning H, de Vasconcellos Vilella O. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner. J Orofac Orthop 2017; 78: 211-20.
DOI
|
23 |
Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 1-16.
DOI
|
24 |
Olszewski R, Szyper-Szczurowska J, Opach M, Bednarczyk P, Zapala J, Szczepanik S. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner. Adv Clin Exp Med 2019; 28: 1647-56.
DOI
|
25 |
Ko HC, Liu W, Hou D, Torkan S, Spiekerman C, Huang GJ. Agreement of treatment recommendations based on digital vs plaster dental models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 155: 135-42.
DOI
|
26 |
Engelbrecht WP, Fourie Z, Damstra J, Gerrits PO, Ren Y. The influence of the segmentation process on 3D measurements from cone beam computed tomography-derived surface models. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 1919-27.
DOI
|
27 |
Poleti ML, Fernandes TM, Moretti MR, Puzinato LR, Slaviero TV, Rubira-Bullen IR. Reliability and accuracy of automatic segmentation of mandibular 3D models on linear measurements. Clin Oral Investig (in press).
|
28 |
Kim J, Heo G, Lagravere MO. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2014; 84: 443-50.
DOI
|
29 |
Luu NS, Nikolcheva LG, Retrouvey JM, Flores-Mir C, El-Bialy T, Carey JP, et al. Linear measurements using virtual study models. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 1098-106.
DOI
|