DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current status of alert alien species management for the establishment of proactive management systems in Korea

  • Son, Seung Hun (Invasive Alien Species Research Team, Division of Ecological Safety, Bureau of Survey and Safety, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Jo, A-Ram (Invasive Alien Species Research Team, Division of Ecological Safety, Bureau of Survey and Safety, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Kim, Dong Eon (Invasive Alien Species Research Team, Division of Ecological Safety, Bureau of Survey and Safety, National Institute of Ecology)
  • Received : 2021.09.16
  • Accepted : 2021.11.02
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Background: Some of the introduced alien species introduced settle, multiply, and spread to become invasive alien species (IAS) that threaten biodiversity. To prevent this, Korea and other countries legally designate and manage alien species that pose a risk to the environment. Moreover, 2160 alien species have been introduced in South Korea, of which 1826 animals and 334 plants are designated. The inflow of IAS can have negative effects such as ecosystem disturbance, habitat destruction, economic damage, and health damage to humans. To prevent damage caused by the inflow of IAS in advance, species that could potentially pose a risk to the environment if introduced in South Korea were designated as alert alien species (AAS). Results: The designation criteria were in accordance with the "Act on the Conservation and Use of Biological Diversity" and the "Regulations on the Ecological Risk Assessment of AAS and IAS" by the National Institute of Ecology. The analysis result of risk and damage cases indicated that mammals affect predation, competition, human economic activity, virus infection, and parasite infection. Birds have been demonstrated to affect predation, competition, human economic activity, and health. It was indicated that plants intrude on the ecosystem by competing with native species with their high-population density and capacity to multiply and cause allergic inducement. Interestingly, 300 species, including 25 mammals, 7 birds, 84 fishes, 28 amphibians, 22 reptiles, 1 insect, 32 spiders, 1 mollusk, 1 arthropod, and 99 plants, are included in the list of AAS. Conclusions: AAS designation plays a role in preventing the reduction of biodiversity by IAS in South Korea and preserving native species. Moreover, it is determined to provide considerable economic benefits by preventing socio-economic losses and ecological damage.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Ecology (NIE-D-2019-09) and (NIE-A-2021-12) and funded by the Minis-try of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Bomford M. Risk assessment models for establishment of exotic vertebrates in Australia and New Zealand. Canberra: Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre; 2008.
  2. Brenton-Rule E, Frankel S, Lester P. Improving management of invasive species: new Zealand's approach to pre-and post-border pests. Policy Quarterly. 2016;12(1):17-25.
  3. Brummitt RK. World geographical scheme for recording plant distributions. 2nd ed; 2001. International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences (TDWG). Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
  4. Cal-IPC (California invasive plant council) (2006) California invasive plant inventory. Cal-IPC Publication 2006-02. California Invasive Plant Council: Berkeley, CA, USA
  5. Congress, U. S. OTA. Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993.
  6. Department of Conservation (1996) Visitor strategy
  7. European Commission (2014) Invasive alien species. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/. Accessed 23 Aug 2016
  8. GB Non-Native Species Secretariat (2016) GB non-native species information portal. http://www.nonnativespecies.org/factsheet/index. Accessed 2 May 2016
  9. Gederaas L, Moen TL, Skjelseth S, Larsen LK. Alien species in Norway - with the Norwegian Black List 2012. Norway: The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre; 2012.
  10. IUCN. IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species, IUCN-The World Conservation Union. Switzerland: Gland; 2000.
  11. Junior DPL, Magalhaes ALB, Pelicice FM, Vitule JRS, Azevedo-Santos VM, Orsi ML, et al. Aquaculture expansion in Brazilian freshwaters against the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Ambio. 2018;47(4):427-40.
  12. Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Pagad S, Starfinger U, ten Brink P, et al. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive species (IAS) - assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU (final module report for the European Commission). Brussels, Belgium: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP); 2008. p. 44. + Annexes
  13. Kil JH, Kim CG. Overview of preventive measures against invasive alien species in Korea and suggestions for their improvement. Korean J Ecol Environ. 2014;47:239-46. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2014.47.4.239
  14. Kil JH, Mun S, Kim CG. Risk assessment tools for invasive alien species in Japan and Europe. Ecol Resilient Infrastructure. 2015;2(3):191-7. https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2015.2.3.191
  15. Koh KS, Suh MH, Kil JH, Ku YB, Oh HK, Lee DG. Research on the effect of alien plants on ecosystem and their management (III). Incheon, Korea: National Institute of Environmental Research; 2002.
  16. Luque GM, Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Bonnaud E, Genovesi P, Simberloff D, et al. The 100th of the world's worst invasive alien species. Biological Invasions. 2014;16:981-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0561-5
  17. McLeod R. Counting the cost: impact of invasive animals in Australia. Canberra: Cooperative Research Centre for Pest Animal Control; 2004.
  18. Ministry for Primary Industries n.d. Unwanted organisms database. Wellington: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry; 2016. Accessed 11 Jan 2016
  19. Ministry of Environment (2014) Long-term management plan of alien species
  20. Ministry of Environment notification. Designation and notification of alert species; 2017. p. 160.
  21. Sardain A, Sardain E, Leung B. Global forecasts of shipping traffic and biological invasions to 2050. Nature Sustainability. 2019;2(4):274-82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0245-y
  22. SCBD (Secretariat of the Covention on Biological Diversity) (2014) Global biodiversity outlook 4. Montreal, Canada
  23. Sharp RL, Larson LR, Green GT. Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management. Biol Conserv. 2011;144(8):2097-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.04.032
  24. US Department of Agriculture (2010) 'Federal noxious weed list', United States Department of Agriculture. Accessed 1 Oct 2015
  25. Xu H, Qiang S, Genovesi P, Ding H, Wu J, Meng L, et al. An inventory of invasive alien species in China. NeoBiota. 2012;15:1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.15.3575