DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PollMap: a software for crop pollination mapping in agricultural landscapes

  • Received : 2021.09.28
  • Accepted : 2021.11.18
  • Published : 2021.12.31

Abstract

Background: Ecosystem service mapping is an important tool for decision-making in landscape planning and natural resource management. Today, pollination service mapping is based on the Lonsdorf model (InVEST software) that determines the availability of nesting and floral resources for each land cover and estimates pollination according to the foraging range of the desired species. However, it is argued that the Lonsdorf model has significant limitations in estimating pollination in a landscape that can affect the results of this model. Results: This paper presents a free software, named PollMap, that does not have the limitations of the Lonsdorf model. PollMap estimates the pollination service according to a modified version of the Lonsdorf model and assumes that only cells within the flight range of bees are important in the pollination mapping. This software is produced for estimating and mapping crop pollination in agricultural landscapes. The main assumption of this software is that in the agricultural landscapes, which are dominated by forest and agriculture ecosystems, forest patches serve only as a nesting habitat for wild bees and the surrounding fields provide floral resources. Conclusion: The present study provided new software for mapping crop pollination in agricultural landscapes that does not have the limitations of the Lonsdorf model. We showed that the use of the Lonsdorf model for pollination mapping requires attention to the limitations of this model, and by removing these limitations, we will need new software to obtain a reliable mapping of pollination in agricultural landscapes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

There are no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. Aguirre-Gutierrez J, Biesmeijer JC, van Loon EE, Reemer M, WallisDeVries MF, Carvalheiro LG. Susceptibility of pollinators to ongoing landscape changes depends on landscape history. Diversity and Distributions. 2015;21(10):1129-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12350.
  2. Bell, W. J., 1990, Central place foraging, in: Searching behaviour, Springer, pp. 171-187.
  3. Carvalheiro LG, Seymour CL, Veldtman R, Nicolson SW. Pollination services decline with distance from natural habitat even in biodiversity-rich areas. J Applied Ecology. 2010;47(4):810-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01829.x.
  4. Cole LJ, Brocklehurst S, Robertson D, Harrison W, McCracken DI. Riparian buffer strips: their role in the conservation of insect pollinators in intensive grassland systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2015;211:207-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.06.012.
  5. Collett M, Chittka L, Collett TS. Spatial memory in insect navigation. Current Biology. 2013;23(17):R789-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.020.
  6. Cunningham C, Tyedmers P, Sherren K. Primary data in pollination services mapping: potential service provision by honey bees (Apis mellifera) in Cumberland and Colchester, Nova Scotia, International Journal of Biodiversity Science. Ecosystem Services & Management. 2018;14(1):60-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1417331.
  7. de Lima KB, Ferreira PA, Groppo M, Goldenberg R, Pansarin ER, Barreto RC, et al. Does landscape context affect pollination-related functional diversity and richness of understory flowers in forest fragments of Atlantic Rainforest in southeastern Brazil? Ecological Processes. 2020;9(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-020-00261-6.
  8. Devoto M, Medan D, Montaldo NH. Patterns of interaction between plants and pollinators along an environmental gradient. Oikos. 2005;109(3):461-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13712.x.
  9. Eastman J. IDRI SI Selva manual, Clark labs-Clark University. Mass. USA: Worcester; 2012.
  10. Fernandes J, Antunes P, Santos R, Zulian G, Clemente P, Ferraz D. Coupling spatial pollination supply models with local demand mapping to support collaborative management of ecosystem services. Ecosystems and People. 2020;16(1):212-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1800821.
  11. Hanula JL, Horn S, O'Brien JJ. Have changing forests conditions contributed to pollinator decline in the southeastern United States? Forest Ecology and Management. 2015;348:142-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.044.
  12. Hodkinson ID. Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biological reviews. 2005;80(3):489-513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006767.
  13. Kallioniemi E, Astrom J, Rusch GM, Dahle S, Astrom S, Gjershaug JO. Local resources, linear elements and mass-flowering crops determine bumblebee occurrences in moderately intensified farmlands. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment. 2017;239:90-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.039.
  14. Keller I, Largiader CR. Recent habitat fragmentation caused by major roads leads to reduction of gene flow and loss of genetic variability in ground beetles, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 2003; 270(1513):417-23. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2247.
  15. Kells AR, Goulson D. Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK. Biological conservation. 2003;109(2):165-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00131-3.
  16. Kimball S. Links between floral morphology and floral visitors along an elevational gradient in a Penstemon hybrid zone. Oikos. 2008;117(7):1064-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16573.x.
  17. Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. J Applied Ecology. 2003;40(5):837-45. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00847.x.
  18. Klein A-M, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the royal society B: biological sciences. 2007;274(1608):303-13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721
  19. Lonsdorf E, Kremen C, Ricketts T, Winfree R, Williams N, Greenleaf S. Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes. Annals of botany. 2009;103(9):1589-600. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp069.
  20. McInnes RJ. Managing. Wetlands for Pollination. 2018;160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_226.
  21. McKechnie IM, Thomsen CJ, Sargent RD. Forested field edges support a greater diversity of wild pollinators in lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2017;237:154-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.005.
  22. Mitchell MG, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A. Strong and nonlinear effects of fragmentation on ecosystem service provision at multiple scales. Environmental Research Letters. 2015;10(9):094014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094014.
  23. Munoz PT, Torres FP, Megias AG. Effects of roads on insects: a review. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2015;24(3):659-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-014-0831-2.
  24. Odanaka KA, Rehan SM. Wild bee distribution near forested landscapes is dependent on successional state. Forest Ecosystems. 2020;7(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00241-4.
  25. Olsson O, Bolin A, Smith HG, Lonsdorf EV. Modeling pollinating bee visitation rates in heterogeneous landscapes from foraging theory. Ecological Modelling. 2015;316:133-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.009.
  26. Phillips BB, Wallace C, Roberts BR, Whitehouse AT, Gaston KJ, Bullock JM, et al. Enhancing road verges to aid pollinator conservation: A review. In: Enhancing road verges to aid pollinator conservation: a review, Biological Conservation:108687; 2020.
  27. Picanco A, Gil A, Rigal F, Borges PA. Pollination services mapping and economic valuation from insect communities: a case study in the Azores (Terceira Island). Nature Conservation. 2017;18:1-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.18.11523.
  28. Potts SG, Imperatriz-Fonseca V, Ngo H, Biesmeijer JC, Breeze T, Dicks L, et al. Summary for policymakers of the assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) on pollinators, pollination and food production; 2016.
  29. Rahimi, E., Barghjelveh, S., Dong, P., 2021a, Estimating landscape structure effects on pollination for management of agricultural landscapes, Estimating landscape structure effects on pollination for management of agricultural landscapes.
  30. Rahimi E, Barghjelveh S, Dong P. Estimating potential range shift of some wild bees in response to climate change scenarios in northwestern regions of Iran. J Ecology and Environment. 2021b;45(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-021-00189-8.
  31. Rahimi, E., Barghjelveh, S., Dong, P., 2021c, How effective are artificial nests in attracting bees? A review, J Ecology and Environment 45(1):1-11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-021-00192-z.
  32. Rahimi E, Barghjelveh S, Dong P. Using the Lonsdorf model for estimating habitat loss and fragmentation effects on pollination service. Ecological Processes. 2021d;10(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00291-8.
  33. Roberts HP, King DI, Milam J. Factors affecting bee communities in forest openings and adjacent mature forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 2017;394:111-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.027.
  34. Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int j services sciences. 2008;1(1):83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
  35. Schulp CJ, Lautenbach S, Verburg PH. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: demand and supply of pollination in the European Union. Ecological Indicators. 2014;36:131-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.014.
  36. Sharp R, Tallis H, Ricketts T, Guerry A, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, et al. InVEST user's guide. Stanford: The Natural Capital Project; 2014.
  37. Svensson B, Lagerlof J, Svensson BG. Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape, Agriculture. Ecosystems & Environment. 2000;77(3):247-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00106-1.
  38. Totland O. Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. Ecology. 2001;82(8):2233-44. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2233:EDPLAS]2.0.CO;2.
  39. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecology Letters. 2003;6(11):961-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00523.x.
  40. Zadeh, L. A., 1996, Fuzzy sets, in: Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers by Lotfi A Zadeh, World Scientific, pp. 394-432.
  41. Zulian G, Paracchini ML, Maes J, Liquete C. ESTIMAP: Ecosystem services mapping at European scale, Publications Office of the European. Luxembourg: Union; 2013.