Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41610-021-00204-y

Current status of alert alien species management for the establishment of proactive management systems in Korea  

Son, Seung Hun (Invasive Alien Species Research Team, Division of Ecological Safety, Bureau of Survey and Safety, National Institute of Ecology)
Jo, A-Ram (Invasive Alien Species Research Team, Division of Ecological Safety, Bureau of Survey and Safety, National Institute of Ecology)
Kim, Dong Eon (Invasive Alien Species Research Team, Division of Ecological Safety, Bureau of Survey and Safety, National Institute of Ecology)
Publication Information
Journal of Ecology and Environment / v.45, no.4, 2021 , pp. 237-254 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Some of the introduced alien species introduced settle, multiply, and spread to become invasive alien species (IAS) that threaten biodiversity. To prevent this, Korea and other countries legally designate and manage alien species that pose a risk to the environment. Moreover, 2160 alien species have been introduced in South Korea, of which 1826 animals and 334 plants are designated. The inflow of IAS can have negative effects such as ecosystem disturbance, habitat destruction, economic damage, and health damage to humans. To prevent damage caused by the inflow of IAS in advance, species that could potentially pose a risk to the environment if introduced in South Korea were designated as alert alien species (AAS). Results: The designation criteria were in accordance with the "Act on the Conservation and Use of Biological Diversity" and the "Regulations on the Ecological Risk Assessment of AAS and IAS" by the National Institute of Ecology. The analysis result of risk and damage cases indicated that mammals affect predation, competition, human economic activity, virus infection, and parasite infection. Birds have been demonstrated to affect predation, competition, human economic activity, and health. It was indicated that plants intrude on the ecosystem by competing with native species with their high-population density and capacity to multiply and cause allergic inducement. Interestingly, 300 species, including 25 mammals, 7 birds, 84 fishes, 28 amphibians, 22 reptiles, 1 insect, 32 spiders, 1 mollusk, 1 arthropod, and 99 plants, are included in the list of AAS. Conclusions: AAS designation plays a role in preventing the reduction of biodiversity by IAS in South Korea and preserving native species. Moreover, it is determined to provide considerable economic benefits by preventing socio-economic losses and ecological damage.
Keywords
Alert alien species; Biodiversity; Conservation; Invasive alien species; Risk assessment;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 GB Non-Native Species Secretariat (2016) GB non-native species information portal. http://www.nonnativespecies.org/factsheet/index. Accessed 2 May 2016
2 Bomford M. Risk assessment models for establishment of exotic vertebrates in Australia and New Zealand. Canberra: Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre; 2008.
3 Brummitt RK. World geographical scheme for recording plant distributions. 2nd ed; 2001. International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences (TDWG). Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
4 Department of Conservation (1996) Visitor strategy
5 European Commission (2014) Invasive alien species. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/invasivealien/. Accessed 23 Aug 2016
6 Gederaas L, Moen TL, Skjelseth S, Larsen LK. Alien species in Norway - with the Norwegian Black List 2012. Norway: The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre; 2012.
7 IUCN. IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species, IUCN-The World Conservation Union. Switzerland: Gland; 2000.
8 Kil JH, Kim CG. Overview of preventive measures against invasive alien species in Korea and suggestions for their improvement. Korean J Ecol Environ. 2014;47:239-46.   DOI
9 Koh KS, Suh MH, Kil JH, Ku YB, Oh HK, Lee DG. Research on the effect of alien plants on ecosystem and their management (III). Incheon, Korea: National Institute of Environmental Research; 2002.
10 Brenton-Rule E, Frankel S, Lester P. Improving management of invasive species: new Zealand's approach to pre-and post-border pests. Policy Quarterly. 2016;12(1):17-25.
11 Congress, U. S. OTA. Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993.
12 Sardain A, Sardain E, Leung B. Global forecasts of shipping traffic and biological invasions to 2050. Nature Sustainability. 2019;2(4):274-82.   DOI
13 Luque GM, Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Bonnaud E, Genovesi P, Simberloff D, et al. The 100th of the world's worst invasive alien species. Biological Invasions. 2014;16:981-5.   DOI
14 Ministry for Primary Industries n.d. Unwanted organisms database. Wellington: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry; 2016. Accessed 11 Jan 2016
15 Ministry of Environment (2014) Long-term management plan of alien species
16 Ministry of Environment notification. Designation and notification of alert species; 2017. p. 160.
17 Junior DPL, Magalhaes ALB, Pelicice FM, Vitule JRS, Azevedo-Santos VM, Orsi ML, et al. Aquaculture expansion in Brazilian freshwaters against the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Ambio. 2018;47(4):427-40.
18 Kil JH, Mun S, Kim CG. Risk assessment tools for invasive alien species in Japan and Europe. Ecol Resilient Infrastructure. 2015;2(3):191-7.   DOI
19 McLeod R. Counting the cost: impact of invasive animals in Australia. Canberra: Cooperative Research Centre for Pest Animal Control; 2004.
20 Sharp RL, Larson LR, Green GT. Factors influencing public preferences for invasive alien species management. Biol Conserv. 2011;144(8):2097-104.   DOI
21 Kettunen M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, Pagad S, Starfinger U, ten Brink P, et al. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive species (IAS) - assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU (final module report for the European Commission). Brussels, Belgium: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP); 2008. p. 44. + Annexes
22 SCBD (Secretariat of the Covention on Biological Diversity) (2014) Global biodiversity outlook 4. Montreal, Canada
23 US Department of Agriculture (2010) 'Federal noxious weed list', United States Department of Agriculture. Accessed 1 Oct 2015
24 Xu H, Qiang S, Genovesi P, Ding H, Wu J, Meng L, et al. An inventory of invasive alien species in China. NeoBiota. 2012;15:1-26.   DOI
25 Cal-IPC (California invasive plant council) (2006) California invasive plant inventory. Cal-IPC Publication 2006-02. California Invasive Plant Council: Berkeley, CA, USA