Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spatial distribution of halophytes and environment factors in salt marshes along the eastern Yellow Sea

  • Chung, Jaesang (DMZ Botanic Garden, Korea National Arboretum) ;
  • Kim, Jae Hyun (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Eun Ju (School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2021.08.24
  • Accepted : 2021.10.25
  • Published : 2021.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Salt marshes provide a variety of ecosystem services; however, they are vulnerable to human activity, water level fluctuations, and climate change. Analyses of the relationships between plant communities and environmental conditions in salt marshes are expected to provide useful information for the prediction of changes during climate change. In this study, relationships between the current vegetation structure and environmental factors were evaluated in the tidal flat at the southern tip of Ganghwa, Korea, where salt marshes are well-developed. Results: The vegetation structure in Ganghwa salt marshes was divided into three groups by cluster analysis: group A, dominated by Phragmites communis; group B, dominated by Suaeda japonica; and group C, dominated by other taxa. As determined by PERMANOVA, the groups showed significant differences with respect to altitude, soil moisture, soil organic matter, salinity, sand, clay, and silt ratios. A canonical correspondence analysis based on the percent cover of each species in the quadrats showed that the proportion of sand increased as the altitude increased and S. japonica appeared in soil with a relatively high silt proportion, while P. communis was distributed in soil with low salinity. Conclusions: The distributions of three halophyte groups differed depending on the altitude, soil moisture, salinity, and soil organic matter, sand, silt, and clay contents. Pioneer species, such as S. japonica, appeared in soil with a relatively high silt content. The P. communis community survived under a wider range of soil textures than previously reported in the literature; the species was distributed in soils with relatively low salinity, with a range expansion toward the sea in areas with freshwater influx. The observed spatial distribution patterns may provide a basis for conservation under declining salt marshes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We appreciate all our Laboratory of Plant Ecology members, especially Minwoo Oh, Minki Hong, Yoon Jeong Heo, and Keon Seok Kim, for helping field surveys.

References

  1. Bang JH, Bae MJ, Lee EJ. Plant distribution along an elevational gradient in a macrotidal salt marsh on the west coast of Korea. Aquatic Botany. 2018;147(August 2017):52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2018.03.005.
  2. Bart D, Hartman JM. Environmental determinants of Phragmites australis expansion in a New Jersey salt marsh: an experimental approach. OIKOS. 2000;89(1):59-69. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890107.x.
  3. Bertness MD, Ellison AM. Determinants of pattern in a New England salt marsh plant community. Ecol Monogr. 1987;57(2):129-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942621.
  4. Bivand R, Muller WG, Reder M. Power calculations for global and local Moran's I. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009;53(8):2859-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.021.
  5. Boyle J. A comparison of two methods for estimating the organic matter content of sediments. J Paleolimnol. 2004;31(1):125-7. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOPL.0000013354.67645.df.
  6. Brereton AJ. The structure of the species populations in the initial stages of saltmarsh succession. J Ecol. 1971;59(2):321-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/2258314.
  7. Carter MR, Gregorich EG. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC press; 2007. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005271.ch57.
  8. Cho JS, Lee JS, Kim JW. Distribution of Phragmites australis communities with different habitat salinity. J Coastal Res. 2017;33(5):1210-6. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-16-00065.1.
  9. Colmer TD, Flowers TJ. Flooding tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol. 2008; 179(4):964-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02483.x.
  10. Cui Q, He T, Zhang A, Quan X, Feng Y, Chen X, et al. Effects of soil salinity characteristics on three habitats in inland salt marshes. J Plant Res. 2021;134(5):1037-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-021-01328-x.
  11. Hong MG. Effects of freshwater inflow, salinity, and water level on the growth of common reed in salt marsh: Seoul National University; 2015.
  12. Ihm BS, Lee JS, Kim JW, Kim JH. Coastal plant and soil relationships along the southwestern coast of South Korea. J Plant Biol. 2007;50(3):331-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030663.
  13. Jang H, Gong J, Kong B, Han S, Ra D, Cheong C. Distribution pattern of halophytes and its soil environment of the saltmarsh in the Sunheon Bay. J Korean Soc Environ Technol. 2013;14(6):399-410.
  14. Kim D. Characterizing the pathway and rate of salt marsh vegetation dynamics: a multivariate approach. Estuaries and Coasts. 2018;41(5):1370-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-018-0377-8.
  15. Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency. Annual Report of Korea Oceanographic Observation Network (2016) 2017;
  16. Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency. Annual Report of Korea Oceanographic Observation Network (2017) 2018;
  17. Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency. Annual report of Korea Oceanographic Observation Network (2018) 2019;
  18. Korea Meteorological Administration. Weather Data Opening Portal 2020; Retrieved December 15, 2020, from https://data.kma.go.kr/cmmn/main.do
  19. Lee HG, Park HS, Hong JS, Je JG, Lee JH. Spatio-temporal variation in the benthic environmental conditions and salt marsh vegetation in Donggeomdo, Incheon, Korea. Korean J Fisheries Aquat Sci. 2006;39(spc1):180-8. https://doi.org/10.5657/kfas.2006.39.spc1.180.
  20. Lee HG, Yoon KT, Park HS, Hong JS, Lee JH. The influence of environmental variables on distribution of macrobenthic community in salt marsh vegetation in donggeomdo, Ganghwa on the west coast of Korea. Ocean Polar Res. 2016;38(2):115-28. https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2016.38.2.115.
  21. Lee Y-K, Park W, Choi JK, Ryu JH, Won JS. Halophyte die-off in response to anthropogenic impacts on tidal flats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2014;151:347-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.09.009.
  22. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. Annual Report of National Marine Ecosystem Monitoring Program (2019) 2019;
  23. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. Marine Environment Information Map 2020;
  24. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries / Korea Marine Environment Management Corporation. Protocol of National Marine Ecosystem Monitoring Program. 3rd ed; 2019.
  25. Murray NJ, Clemens RS, Phinn SR, Possingham HP, Fuller RA. Tracking the rapid loss of tidal wetlands in the Yellow Sea. Front Ecol Environ. 2014;12(5):267-72. https://doi.org/10.1890/130260.
  26. Newton A, Icely J, Cristina S, Perillo GME, Turner RE, Ashan D, et al. Anthropogenic, direct pressures on coastal wetlands. Front Ecol Evol. 2020;8:144 Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00144.
  27. Ogle DH, Wheeler P, Dinno A. FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis; 2021.
  28. Oksanen J, Guillaume FB, Michael F, Roeland K, Pierre L, Dan M, et al. Package ' vegan '; 2020.
  29. Olff H, De Leeuw J, Bakker JP, Platerink RJ, van Wijnen HJ. Vegetation succession and herbivory in a salt marsh: changes induced by sea level rise and silt deposition along an elevational gradient. J Ecol. 1997;Vol. 85:799-814. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960603.
  30. Parida AK, Das AB. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2005;60(3):324-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010.
  31. Pebesma EJ. Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput GeoSci. 2004;30(7):683-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012.
  32. Santelmann MV, Boisjolie BA, Flitcroft R, Gomez M. Relationships between salt marsh vegetation and surface elevation in Coos Bay Estuary, Oregon. Northwest Sci. 2019;93(2):137-54. https://doi.org/10.3955/046.093.0205.
  33. Silvestri S, Defina A, Marani M. Tidal regime, salinity and salt marsh plant zonation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2005;62(1-2):119-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2004.08.010.
  34. van Regteren M, Amptmeijer D, de Groot AV, Baptist MJ, Elschot K. Where does the salt marsh start? Field-based evidence for the lack of a transitional area between a gradually sloping intertidal flat and salt marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2020;243:106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106909.
  35. Woo HJ. Long-term changes of sediment and topography at the Southern Kanghwa Tidal Flat, West Coast of Korea. J Wetlands Res. 2013;15(4):493-500. https://doi.org/10.17663/jwr.2013.15.4.493.
  36. Zare-Mehrjardi M, Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R, Akbarzadeh A. Evaluation of geostatistical techniques for mapping spatial distribution of soil PH, salinity and plant cover affected by environmental factors in Southern Iran. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2010;2(4):92-103. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb244997.