한국기록관리학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)

  • 제21권1호
  • /
  • Pages.97-116
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1598-1487(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-7247(eISSN)
한국기록관리학회 (Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

육군 구성원의 기록관리 인식에 대한 연구: 신제도주의적 관점으로

A Study on the Awareness of Records Management by the Republic of Korea Army Personnel: From a Viewpoint of New Institutionalism

  • 이지은 (연세대학교 대학원 문헌정보학과 기록관리학전공) ;
  • 김기영 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2021.01.18
  • 심사 : 2021.02.05
  • 발행 : 2021.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

군 기록관리는 꾸준한 양적성장에도 불구하고 아직 조직문화로 정착되지 못한 상태이다. 이는 조직에 기록관리제도 정착의 주요 한계점으로 지목되고 있다. 규율을 중시하는 조직 특성을 고려해 보았을 때, 구성원의 기록관리 인식의 원인을 제도적 맥락을 중심으로 분석해 볼 필요가 있다. 따라서, 구성원의 기록관리 행위를 제약하고 있는 관련 제도를 비교·분석한 후, 심층면담을 실시하였다. 이후 역사적 제도주의 관점과 해석현상학적 분석기법(IPA)을 적용하여 제도의 내용, 권력관계, 조직특성, 구성원 인식을 주요 요인으로 도출하였다. 분석결과, 육군 구성원들은 업무수행절차를 규정하는 여러 제도 간의 비일관성으로 혼선을 느끼고 있으며 제도 및 조직에서 추구하는 책임성과 효율성의 가치가 조직목표와 제대로 연계되지 못하고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 따라서 제도의 법적 정당성을 보장할 수 있도록 제도개선의 필요가 있으며, 책임성과 효율성을 조직목표와 올바르게 연계하여 교육을 통해 구성원에게 내재화해야 함이 도출되었다. 본 연구를 통해 기록관리 인식개선 및 제도정착을 위한 실마리를 제공해 줄 수 있을 것이다.

This study aims to analyze the level of members' awareness of records management in the Republic of Korea Army within the institutional context extensively. Accordingly, in-depth interviews were conducted after comparing and analyzing the institutional systems that restricted the members' record management activities. As a result, it was identified that the members were confused by the inconsistency among the systems that defined the work procedures, and that the value of responsibility and efficiency in the records management system does not match the organization's goals. Therefore, the legal justification of the system should be improved in harmony with the responsibilities and efficiency and to match them with the organization's objectives. Moreover, the improved system should be internalized by the members through instructions that are relevant to the content of the system. This study intends to increase awareness in the records management system and improve the system as well.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, Yoon-tae (2012). Development plan for record management in the ROK Army. master's thesis, Division of Archive Management, Graduate school of Hanyang University.
  2. Jeong, Ki-ae & Kim, Youseung (2009). A Study of Improvement for Public Records Management Act: Based on KS X ISO 15489. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 26(1), 231-257. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2009.26.1.231
  3. Kim, Chuljin (2013). Problems of the Army (Military Division Levels and Below) Administrative Simplified Implementation and its Improvement Plan. master's thesis, Graduate School of Public Administration, Korea University.
  4. Kim, Taekyoun & Kim, Giyeong (2017). Factors Influencing Awareness of Records Management on the Republic of Korea Army: Records Management Systems and Organizational Culture. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 51(51), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.51.209
  5. Lee, Hyosang (2004). A System-Based Study on the Establishment of the Army Records Management System. Seoul: RIKAR.
  6. Lee, Kyu-chul (2016). Understanding of administrative information system data sets and considerations for record management. 기록인, 37, 56-61.
  7. Nam, Giewoong (2012). A Study on Improvement of Army Records Management System. master's thesis, Graduate School of Records, Archives & Information Scoence, Myungji University.
  8. Oh, Seh-La, Park, Seunghoon, & Yim, Jin-Hee (2018). A Case Study of Dataset Records in Information Management System. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 18(2), 109-133. http://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2018.18.2.109
  9. On, Mangeum (2011). Military response and trust after the ROK Cheonan sinking. University of Defense Research Institute's Special Symposium.
  10. Park, Mi young (2019). A Study on Capture of Datasets for Administrative Information as Records. master's thesis, Department of archival science, Graduate School of Seoul National University
  11. Seol, Moon-won (2016) Strategies for promoting the evaluation and utilization of records management standards. 기록인, 36, 62-67.
  12. Seol, Moon-won (2019). Where comes from trust?: Looking back on the 20 years of the Public Records Management Act. Journal of the 2019 Record Day Conference.
  13. Hall, Peter A. & Rosemary C. R. Taylor (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. MPIFG Discussion Paper, 96(6), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
  14. Hammersly, M. (1990). The Dilemma of Qualitative Method. London, UK: Routledge.
  15. Ikenberry, G. John (1988). Conclusion: An institutional approach to american foreign economic policy. International Organization, 42(1), 219-243. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300007189
  16. Korpi, Walter (2001). Contentious institutions: An augmented rational-action analysis of the origins and path dependency of welfare state institutions in western countries. Rationality and Society, 13(2), 235-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346301013002005
  17. Kranser, Stephen D. (1984). Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics, 16(2), 223-246. https://doi.org/10.2307/421608
  18. March, James G. & Johan P. Olsen. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734-749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
  19. Powell, Walter W. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.