DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

재정여건이 회계지표에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 -사립대학 재정건전성을 중심으로-

A study on the Impact of Financial Conditions on Accounting indicators -Focusing on the Financial Soundness of Private Universities-

  • Park, Tae-Hwan (Dept. of Career Development Center, Tongmyong University) ;
  • Bae, Eun-Jin (Department of Inter Culture Business, Pusan University of Foreign Studies)
  • 투고 : 2021.09.27
  • 심사 : 2021.12.20
  • 발행 : 2021.12.28

초록

본 연구는 등록금 인상 억제로 인한 사립대학들의 재정 위축 상황에서 사립대학의 유보금과, 대학의 건전성이 회계 지표와 어떤 관계인지를 종합적으로 살펴보고 재정정책에 시사점을 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다. 독립변수인 재정여건의 하위변수로 교내유보금과 재정건전성으로 하고, 종속변수인 재정지표의 하위변수로 학생1인당교육비, 인건비비율, 연구학생경비비율, 관리운영비비율로 하여 대학특성변수에 의한 조절효과까지 검증하였다. SPSS 25을 활용하여 상관관계분석과 다중회귀분석을 실시하였다. 첫째, 사립대학의 교내 유보금 항목이 회계지표 항목에 영향을 미쳤다. 둘째, 재정 건전성 항목이 회계지표 항목에 영향을 미쳤다. 셋째, 소재지에 따라 재정여건이 회계지표 변화에 영향을 미쳤다. 넷째, 학생규모에 따라 재정여건 요인이 회계지표 변화의 영향을 미쳤다. 사립대학의 정부 투자와 지원은 정원감축을 통한 재정지원이 아닌, 발전계획 수립을 통한 재정확보 패러다임으로 변화되어야 하며, 수입 다변화 정책 전략으로 생존을 모색해야 할 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to provide implications for fiscal policy by comprehensively examining the relationship between the on-campus retention and university soundness items of four-year private universities in the context of financial contraction of private universities due to suppression of tuition increase. Multiple regression analysis was performed to analyze the correlation of variables and the effect of financial soundness items on accounting indicators using SPSS 25. First, private university's on-campus reservations had an effect on accounting index items. Second, financial soundness items had an effect on accounting index items. Third, the financial condition factors influenced the change of accounting index by the location of the university. Fourth, according to the size of students, financial conditions had an effect on the change in accounting indicators. Government investment and support for private universities should be changed to a paradigm of securing finance through establishment of a development plan, rather than financial support through reduction of quota, and survival should be sought through income diversification policy strategies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Y. H. Kang. (2012), Statistics Korea and World Education Series 10: University Tuition and University Finance. Korea Educational Development Institute, SM 2012-01-2.
  2. T. J. Gwon. (2013). A study on financial reform and the improvement of competitiveness for Private Universities. Korea University, Seoul.
  3. H. J. Yang. (2021. 4 .12). Enhancing competitiveness through innovation in private universities. University News Network, p, 1413.
  4. G. R. Pike. & J. C. Hayek. (2006). Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter, Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 847-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9018-3
  5. G. R. Pike. (2004). Measuring quality: A comparison of US News rankings and NSSE benchmarks. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:rihe.0000015695.84207.44
  6. J. Y. Kim. & J. G. Lee. (2014). Exploring the Changes in the Finances of Private Universities Following the National Scholarship Program. Educational Finance and Economy Research, 23(1), 153-179.
  7. S. K. Kim. (2016). Trends of Changes in Private University Finances and University Differences According to University Tuition Policy. Educational Finance and Economy Research, 25(2), 151-176.
  8. G. Y. Park. (2017) Corporate Transfer Money. Korea Higher Research Institute, 66(3), 1-3.
  9. I. K. Kim. (2014). A study on effects on the university's performance by fiscal features of private universities, University of Ulsan, Ulsan.
  10. T. W. Lee. (2010). The Influential Relationship Between Financial Conditions and Performance in Korean Private Universities. Kyung Gee University, Seoul.
  11. S. G. Nam. (2012). The Relation among Financial Condition, Scholarship, and Tuition Fee of Private Universities. The Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 21(4), 101-124.
  12. M. Y. Kim. (2014). Analysis of Financial Variables of Private Universities Affecting the Quality in University. Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk.
  13. P. N. Lee. (2014). An exploratory analysis on the relationship between the level and pattern of educational expenditures of private four-year universities and higher education quality indicators in Korea. The Journal of economics and finance of education, 23(2), 235-266.
  14. S. M. Jang. & S. D. Choi. (2009). 4-Year University Characteristics and Graduates' Labor Market Performance. The Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 19(2), 1-31.
  15. J. S. Park. & H. J. Hong. (2009). Educational Performance and Government Financial Support. The Journal of Economics and Finance of Education, 18(1), 59-80.
  16. J. G. Oh. (2010). The Effects on the Management Performance by the Size and Region Factors of Private Universities. Korea International Accounting Review, 31, 265-284.
  17. G. U. Na. (2010). A Study on the Influence of Private University Characteristic to Financial Information. Geang Ju University, Seoul.
  18. S. S. Yeom. & D. H. Lee (2015). Various Aspects of Management Performances by Inherent Characteristics of Universities. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 15(2), 57-80.