DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Inelastic Whipping Responses in a Navy Ship by Underwater Explosion

수중 폭발에 의한 함체의 비탄성 휘핑 응답에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Hyunwoo (Dept. of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Seo, Jae Hoon (Dept. of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Choung, Joonmo (Dept. of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
  • 김현우 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 서재훈 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 정준모 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Received : 2021.06.22
  • Accepted : 2021.10.25
  • Published : 2021.12.20

Abstract

The primary effect of the far-field underwater explosion (UNDEX) is the whipping of the ship hull girder. This paper aims to verify why inelastic effects should be considered in the whipping response estimations from the UNDEX simulations. A navy ship was modeled using Timoshenko beam elements over the ship length uniformly keeping the constant midship section modulus. The transient UNDEX pressure was produced using two types of the Geers-Hunter doubly-asymptotic models: compressible and incompressible fluids. Because the UNDEX model based on incompressible fluid assumption provided more increased fluid volume acceleration in the bubble phase, the incompressible fluid-based UNDEX model was adopted for the inelastic whipping response analyses. The non-linear hull girder bending moment-curvature curve was used to embed inelastic effects in the UNDEX analyses where the Smith method was applied to derive the non-linear stiffness. We assumed two stand-off distances to see more apparent inelastic effects: 40.5 m and 35.5 m. In the case of the 35.5 m stand-off distance, there was a statistically significant inelastic effect in terms of the average of peak moments and the average exceeding proportional limit moments. For the conservative design of a naval ship under UNDEX, it is recommended to use incompressible fluid. In the viewpoint of cost-effective naval ship design, the inelastic effects should be taken into account.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 2020년도 산업통상자원부의 재원으로 한국에너지 기술평가원 (KETEP)의 지원을 받아 수행되었습니다. (No. 20203030020230)

References

  1. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), 2021. Guidance notes on ship vibration. New York, USA.
  2. Caldwell, J.B., 1965. Ultimate longitudinal strength. Transantions of Royal Istitution of Naval Architects, 107, pp.411-430.
  3. Coles, J.S., Christian, E.A., Slifko, J.P., Niffennegger, C.R. & Rogers, M.A., 1946. Shock-wave parameters from spherical TNT charges detonated underwater. in Underwater Explosion Research Office of Naval Research, Washington D.C., 1, pp.1085-1105.
  4. Farley, T.E. & Snay, H.G., 1978. Unclassified data from classified source. in Explosion Effects and Properties: Part II. Explosion Effects in Water, NSWC/WOL TR 76-116.
  5. Geers, T.L. & Hunter, K.S., 2002. An integrated wave-effects model for an underwater explosion bubble. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 111(4), pp.1584-1601. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1458590
  6. Hicks, A.N., 1970. Effect of bubble migration on explosion-induced whipping in ships. Naval Ship Research and Developement Center Technical Report No. 3301.
  7. Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.H. & Lee, S.G., 2005a. Comparison of UNDEX whipping response of hull girder according to modeling method. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea. 42(6), pp.631-636. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.6.631
  8. Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.H. & Lee, S.G., 2005b. Whipping factor - a measure of damage potential of an UNDEX bubble pulse. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea. 42(6), pp.637-643. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2005.42.6.637
  9. Lee, S.G., Kwon, J.I. & Chung, J.H., 2007. Integrated structural dynamic response analysis considering the UNDEX shock wave and gas bubble pulse. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea. 44(2), pp.148-153. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2007.44.2.148
  10. Price, R.S., 1979. Similitude equations for explosives fired underwater. Technical Report NSWC TR 80-299, NSWC.
  11. Samuel, D.S., George, J.H. & Oliver, E.S., 1957. Some properties and characteristic of HBX-1, HBX-3, and H-6 explosives. Technical Report No. 2431.
  12. Simulia, 2018. Abaqus user manual. Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp, Providence, RI, USA.
  13. Smith, C.S., 1977. Influence of local compressive failure on ultimate longitudinal strength of a ship's hull. PRADS: International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding, Tokyo, Japan, October 1977.
  14. Xiao, W., Zhang, A.M., & Wang, S.P., 2016. The whipping response of a fluid filled cylindrical shell subjected to an underwater explosion, Marine Structures, 52, 82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.12.002
  15. Zhang, Z., & Zong, Z., 2011. The effect of rigid-body motions on the whipping response of a ship hull subjected to an underwater bubble. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 27, 1326-1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.05.004