DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the selection of management target fishing port for efficient management of fishing boats and pleasure boats - Jeju special self-governing province focuses on the fishing port -

어선과 레저선박의 효율적 관리를 위한 관리대상 어항 선정에 대한 연구 - 제주특별자치도 어항을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2020.07.20
  • Accepted : 2020.09.16
  • Published : 2020.11.30

Abstract

In Jeju, in order to efficiently manage and coexist fishing boats and passenger ships in narrow ports, it is necessary to establish reasonable policies. The survey was conducted on 99 fishing ports, from December 1 to 31, 2018. A site survey was conducted on 30 parties (15 in Jeju City and 15 in Seogwipo City) concerning with the use of fishing ports in Jeju to review the appropriate conditions for selecting fishing ports as control subjects. The survey determined size of pleasure craft mooring within fishing port (20%), size of fishing boat mooring (20%), and accessibility of fishing port (20%) under on-site survey factors as well as willingness to form a consultative group between fishing boat and pleasure craft users (20%). Upon the request of the survey, positive and negative opinions were collected on the establishment of a safety control center in the fish port. Based on the survey results, the factors mentioned above were applied to each and every fishing port within Jeju. The bottom five fishing ports in Jeju with the lowest total factor scores were identified and selected as control subjects for review and study. Of the five fishing ports selected as control subjects amidst the 99 fishing ports in Jeju, Dodu Fishing Port had the lowest score of 22% among the national fishing harbors. Among the local fishing ports, Hwabuk Fishing Port had the lowest score of 18%, followed by Sagae Fishing Port with a score of 22%. Hamdeok Fishing Port had the lowest score of 24% among the fishing port villages, whereas Ojo Fishing Port had the lowest score of 24% among the small fishing ports.

Keywords

References

  1. KMI. 2009. Korea maritime institute, A prerequisites for the growth of the leisure boat industry in Korea. Ocean and land 21. 43-44.
  2. KMI. 2009. Korea maritime institute, A prerequisites for the growth of the leisure boat industry in Korea. Ocean and land 21. 49-52.
  3. KMI 2016. Korea maritime institute, improvement measures for leisure boat management system in Korea. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.978.897998/0431.
  4. KMI 2016. Korea maritime institute, improvement measures for leisure boat management system in Korea. 9-103. https://doi.org/10.978.897998/0431.
  5. KOSIS. Korea urban statistics coastline and island status data. Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr. Accessed 14 September 2019.
  6. MOF. 2014. Ministry of oceans fisheries, National fishing port development excellence collection. 5-67.
  7. MOF. 2018. Ministry Of Oceans Fisheries, Status of leisure ship registration in Korea and obtaining a pilot license for powered water leisure equipment. Retrieved from http://www.marinaportal.co.kr. Accessed 8 August 2019.
  8. Ji SU, Kim YJ and Lee JH, 2005. The promotion of experiential marine sports by developing a plan for fishing village and port. JFMSE 17, 86-105.
  9. JSGP. 2018. Jeju Special Self Governing Province, A study on the efficient management plan betweren fishing boat and leisure boat in each port of Jeju Island, 6-18.
  10. Jung WJ and Kim JG, 2012. A study on pleasure boat development and utilization of fishing port area - lessons from Japan KINPR. Press, 39-40