DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Analysis and Improvement of STANAG 4586 / MAVLink Protocol for Interoperability Improvement of UAS

UAS 상호운용성 향상을 위한 STANAG 4586과 MAVLink 프로토콜 비교분석 및 개선방안 연구

  • Nam, Gyeongrae (Avionics Research Institute, LIG Nex1 Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Go, Jeonghwan (Avionics Research Institute, LIG Nex1 Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Kwon, Cheolhee (Avionics Research Institute, LIG Nex1 Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Jeong, Soyoung (Aerospace Technology Research Institute, Agency for Defense Development)
  • 남경래 (LIG넥스원(주) 항공전자연구소) ;
  • 고정환 (LIG넥스원(주) 항공전자연구소) ;
  • 권철희 (LIG넥스원(주) 항공전자연구소) ;
  • 정소영 (국방과학연구소 항공기술연구원)
  • Received : 2020.07.08
  • Accepted : 2020.11.06
  • Published : 2020.12.05

Abstract

An unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV) refers to an aircraft that has all or part of its functions to autonomously fly by grasping the surrounding environment by remote control on the ground without a pilot on board. With the development of unmanned aerial technology, civil/military forces are developing unmanned aerial vehicles for various purposes. In order to control unmanned aerial vehicles from the ground, communication protocols between unmanned aerial vehicles and ground control equipment are required, and civil/military forces have developed and used a photocall for different purposes. In this study, the characteristics of the MAVLink protocol used in the private sector and the STANAG 4586 protocol used in the military are compared/analyzed in detail to find elements to complement each other and to draw improvement measures for protocol unification.

Keywords

References

  1. KATS, "UAV Industry Outlook and Standardization Trend," KATS Technical Report - 89, 2016.
  2. Hui-Min, "Autonomy Levels For Unmanned Systems (ALFUS) Framework," NIST Spec. Publ. 1011-I-2.0, 2007.
  3. KATS, "Drone Technical Regulation Guide 2," 2018-2, 2018.
  4. ETRI, "R&D Trends in Network-Based Control and Non-payload Communication for Unmanned Aircraft Systems," Vol. 32, No. 4, 2017.
  5. MIL-STD-881D
  6. Hack-Joon Kim, "Application of STANAG 4586 Ed. 4 based Standardization for Up-to-Dated Interoperability of Military UAV System," JKSCI, 2019-01 24:99-107, 2019.
  7. https://www.dronecode.org
  8. http://ardupilot.org/
  9. http://autoquad.org/
  10. https://github.com/iNavFlight/inav/wiki
  11. http://ardupilot.org/planner/
  12. http://qgroundcontrol.com/
  13. https://www.ugcs.com/
  14. DTAQ, "2017 Global Defense Market Yearbook," 2017.
  15. C. Drubin, "The Global UAV Market 2015-2025," Microw J., Vol. 58, No. 3, pp. 53-54, Mar., 2015.
  16. Y. I. Bae and H. R. Shin, "Prerequisites for Drones Industry Development," Issue & Analysis, No. 237, pp. 1-25, 2016.
  17. S. J. Song and B. O. Kil, "A Study on the Glo UAV Market," KADIS, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 49-76, 2015.
  18. https://nso.nato.int/nso/zPublic/stanags/CURRENT/4586EFed04.pdf
  19. https://nso.nato.int/nso/zPublic/stanags/current/4545eed02.pdf
  20. https://www.opengroup.org/face
  21. https://community.ucsarchitecture.info/dodarchive/home.html
  22. Fernando Coito, "Reference Model for Interoperability of Autonomous Systems," 2018.
  23. NATO, "STANAG 4586 - Standard Interfaces of UAV Control System(UCS) for NATO UAV Interoperability," Ed1, 2004.
  24. UPVLC, "Camelot Architecture and Data Model," Ref. Ares(2018)6161960 - 30/11/2018, 2018.
  25. https://mavlink.io/en/
  26. Seungyeon Choi, "Analysis of Replay Attack Vulnerability in RF Communication Environment," Korea University, 2017.
  27. Stefano Frazzetta.Marco Pacino, "A STANAG 4586 Oriented Approach to UAS Navigation," 2013.
  28. Anis Koubaa, "Micro Air Vehicle Link(MAVLink) in a Nutshell: A Survey," 2015.
  29. Young-min Kwon, "Vulnerability Analysis of the Mavlink Protocol for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles," DGIST, 2018.
  30. Alain AJAMI, "Path Planning and Ground Control Station Simulator for UAV," 2013.
  31. Alexandre Vale, "Unmanned Systems Interoperability in Military Maritime Operations_MAVLink to STANAG 4586 Bridge," 2017.
  32. DoD, "Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap FY2013-2038," 2013.
  33. Yonsei University - ASTI, "Research on Development Plans to Improve Flight Safety of Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicle," DAPA, 2014.
  34. Office of the Secretary of Defense, "Unmanned System Integrated Roadmap 2017_2042," 2017.
  35. U. S. Army UAS Center of Excellence, "U. S. Army roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems 2010-2035," 2010.
  36. G. C. Rosa, Mario Monteiro Marques, and V. Lobo, "Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Navy: Its Benefits," in Sea Conf 16, Constanta, pp. 1-5, 2016.
  37. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Drone Industry Basic Development Plan 2017-2027," 2017.
  38. https://dronepang.co.kr/m/content/index.html?section=116&category=127&c160%5B0%5D=169&c161%5B0%5D=305&no=71
  39. https://futuristspeaker.com/business-trends/192-futureuses-for-flying-drones/
  40. http://weeklybiz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2018/04/20/2018042001814.html
  41. http://www.ciokorea.com/news/37558
  42. Kyunghwan Heo, "Mission Computer Zeroize Function Software Design for the Korean Military Helicopter," SASE 2018 Spring Conference, DT3-3, 2018.
  43. Fernando Coito, "Reference Model for Interoperability of Autonomous Systems," 2018.