The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Antecedents and consequences of perceived usefulness of team project-based learning

팀프로젝트 기반 학습법에 대해 지각된 유용성의 선행요인과 결과요인에 대한 연구

  • Lee, Sungmi (Dept. of Advertising, PR & Visual Communication, HanshinUniv)
  • 이성미 (한신대학교 미디어영상광고홍보학부)
  • Received : 2020.09.30
  • Accepted : 2020.10.23
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to suggest strategies of team project based learning for undergraduate students by exploring the effects of perceived usefulness on satisfaction in team project-based learning. Also, this study investigated the effects of autonomy support, self-efficacy for group work, and perceived interaction on perceived usefulness. The findings of this study revealed that perceived usefulness affects satisfaction in team project-based learning. Moreover, the results showed that autonomy support and self-efficacy for group work influence perceived usefulness. The findings of this study imply that perceived usefulness is critical team project-based learning is critical to successful learning. Additionally, autonomy support and self-efficacy for group work enables users to perceive usefulness in team project-based learning.

본 연구는 대학생이 지각하는 팀 프로젝트 기반 학습법에 대한 유용성과 학습만족도 간의 관계를 규명하고 지각된 자율성, 협력적 효능감, 인지된 상호작용성이 지각된 유용성에 미치는 효과를 탐색하였다. 이를 위해 경기도 소재 대학생 55명이 한 학기 동안 팀 프로젝트 기반 학습을 완료 후 설문조사에 참여하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 팀 프로젝트 기반 학습법에 대해 지각된 유용성이 높을수록 학습만족도가 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 지각된 자율성과 협력적 효능감을 높게 인식할 때 학습법에 대한 지각된 유용성을 높게 인식하였다. 이와 같은 연구결과는 대학의 팀 프로젝트 기반 학습법 설계 시 학습자가 학습법이 효율적이고 유용하다고 느끼게 하는 것이 중요하며 이를 위해 자율성을 지지하는 환경조성과 학습자가 협력하여 공동의 목표를 성취할 수 있는 능력을 충분히 갖췄다고 느낄 수 있는 전략이 필요함을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Lin. "Effects of an online team project-based learning environment with group awareness and peer evaluation on socially shared regulation of learning and self-regulated learning," Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol.37, No.5, pp.445-461, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1451558
  2. H. Chen & H. Huang. "User acceptance of mobile knowledge management learning system: Desigh and analysis" , Journal of Educational Technology & Society , Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.70-77, 2010.
  3. R. Cheung & D. Vogel. "Predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies: An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning", Computers & Education, Vol.63, 160-175, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
  4. S. Liawa & H. Huang. "Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments",Computers & Education, Vol. 60, No.1, pp.14-24, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.015
  5. F. Davis. "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No.3, pp.319-340, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  6. J. C. Jeon. "The effect of mobile foodservice platform service characteristics on ease of use, usefulness, and reuse intention", The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (JCCT), Vol.5, No.2, pp.31-37, 2019, https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2019.5.2.31
  7. A. Rassuli & J. Manzer. ""Teach us to learn": Multivariate analysis of perception of success in team learning", Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 81, No.1, pp.21-27, 2005. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.1.21-28
  8. R. Ryan & E. Deci. "Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being" , American Psychologist, Vol. 55, pp. 68-78, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  9. E. Deci & R. Ryan. "Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior", Perspectives in Psychology, New York: Plenum. 1985.
  10. A. Black & E. Deci. "The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective", British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.78, pp. 375-393. 2000 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X240471
  11. S. Alavi & J. McCormick, "The roles of perceived task interdependence and group members' interdependence in the development of collective efficacy in university student group contexts", British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.78, pp. 375-393, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X240471
  12. A. Bandura. "Toward a psychology of human agency", Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 1, pp. 164-180, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
  13. L. Eby & G. Dobbins. "Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis", Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.18, pp.275-295, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199705)18:3<275::AID-JOB796>3.0.CO;2-C
  14. R. Stone & J. Bailey. "Team conflict self-efficacy and outcome expectancy of business students" , Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 82, No.5, pp.258-266, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.5.258-266
  15. H. Wen. "The effects of task structure on group process and quality of group product in a cooperative project-based learning environment (Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University)", 1998.
  16. H. S. Park. "Effects of problem-based learning (PBL) in fashion design classes" , International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology(IJACT), Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.222-288, 2019, DOI 10.17703/IJACT.2019.7.4.222
  17. N. Shin. "Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning", Distance Education, Vol.24, No.1, 69-86, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303048