Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Re-Organization of Port Governance in Gyeonggi Province

경기도의 항만 거버넌스 재정비방안

  • Jung, Hyun-Jae (Division of International Logistics, Pyeongtaek University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Hyon (Division of International Logistics, Pyeongtaek University)
  • 정현재 (평택대학교 국제물류학과) ;
  • 이동현 (평택대학교 국제물류학과)
  • Received : 2020.09.14
  • Accepted : 2020.11.20
  • Published : 2020.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to present an alternative to improve the complex structure of Gyeonggi port governance. Based on previous research, advanced port operation, timely development of port, port safety management, and growth with the region were selected as the main roles of port governance. In addition, the importance of each role was analyzed by selecting the government-led port authority and government and local joint port authority as alternatives. As a result of the analysis, it was found that the establishment of the government-led port authority was reasonable in terms of advanced port operation, timely port development, and port safety management. On the other hand, local joint port authority is reasonable in terms of growth with the region. The implication of this study is that it is necessary to simplify port governance in Gyeonggi Privince and establish the government-led port authority in which Participation of local governments is required for linking regional administration and urban development plans.

본 연구는 퍼지계층분석법을 이용하여 현재 복잡한 구조로 이루어진 경기도의 항만 거버넌스에 대한 최적 대안 도출하고 시사점을 제시한 연구이다. 선행연구를 토대로 항만 운영의 고도화, 항만의 적기개발, 항만 안전관리, 지역과의 상생발전을 항만 거버넌스의 주요 역할로 선정하였다. 그리고 경기도의 항만 거버넌스 재정비 방안으로서 국가주도형 항만공사와 중앙-지방 연합형 항만공사를 대안으로 선정하여 각 역할에 대한 중요도를 분석하였다. 그 결과 항만 운영의 고도와, 항만의 적기개발, 항만 안전관리 측면에서 국가주도형 항만공사 설립이 타당한 것으로 나타났으며 지역과의 상생발전 측면에서는 중앙-지방 연합형 항만공사 도입이 타당한 것으로 제시되었다. 따라서 경기도의 항만산업 활성화를 위해 단일화된 거버넌스 구조로서 지자체가 참여하는 국가주도형 항만공사 설립 방안을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. G. Park, X. Q. Liu & S. H. Kim. (2016). A Selective & Task on Utilizing Port Business Management via AHP. Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 90, 347-360.
  2. N. R. Kim, H. R. Choi & T. H. Lee. (2018). Analysis of Domestic SNA-based Governance Study Trends. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(7), 35-45. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.7.035
  3. J. S. Lim & Y. J. Roh. (2007). A Study on the Co-opetition Strategies for Decentralization of Port Management. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 20(5), 2135-2156.
  4. A. J. Baird. (2002). Privatization Trends at the World's Top-100 Container Ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 29(3), 271-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830210132579
  5. I. H. Baek & S. J. Hwang. (2011). A Study on the Improvement of Port Administration System: Focused on the Port Authority of Korea. The Journal of the Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 23(3), 503-514.
  6. H. S. Bang & O. K. Kwon. (2006). Role of Port Authority from the Standpoint of Port Governance. Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 51, 141-162.
  7. Y. H. Gang. (2006). The Efficiency Improvement of Port Governance Structure with the Introduction of Port Authority. Korean Public Administration Review, 40(1), 151-174.
  8. S. D. Choi. (2007). Searching for the Ocean Administrative System to Strengthen the Competitiveness of Busan Port, Ocean Capital of Korea. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 10(4), 151-174.
  9. Y. H. Gang. (2009). The Formations and Changes of Port Governance Institution in U.S.A.: The Conflicts and Agreements between New York and New Jersey about the New York-New Jersey Port District. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 12(4), 323-343.
  10. Y. H. Woo. (2010). Issue and Policy Implication of Maritime Administration in Local Government: A Practical Guide to Building an Effective Ocean Governance Structure. The Korean Governance Review, 17(2), 1-22. DOI : 10.17089/kgr.2010.17.2.001
  11. Y. H. Woo & Y. H. Gang. (2012). A Study on the Formation and Influencing Factors of Ocean Governance in Busan, the Ocean Capital of Korea: A New Guide to Conflict Resolution Among Busan Marine Stakeholders. Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 36(3), 233-243. DOI : 10.5394/KINPR.2012.36.3.233
  12. D. H. Lee. (2013). Governance-Based Measures to Solve the Conflicts in Pyeongtaek-Dangjin Port. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 29(3), 135-158.
  13. S. H. Lim. (2019). A Study on the Busan Advancement of Global Port City & the Marine Policy Governance. The Korean Parliamentary Studies Review, 4(1), 106-132.
  14. S. M. Kwon, J. Y. Pak, H. J. Jung, Y. Wang & G. T. Yeo. (2011). A Study on the role of port operation organizations for the development of a region port. Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, 35(5), 439-444. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2011.35.5.439
  15. L. A. Zadeh. (1975). The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning-I. Information Science, 8, 199-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
  16. T. L. Satty. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  17. D. Y. Chang. (1996). Application of Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2