Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship (벤처창업연구)

The Korean Society of Business Venturing (한국벤처창업학회)
권호 표지

An Empirical Study on Appraisal Indices' Discrimination Significance for Technology Financing: Focusing on KOTEC's Business Feasibility Appraisal Indices

기술금융 평가지표의 판별유의성에 관한 실증연구 : 기술보증기금의 기술사업성 평가지표를 중심으로

  • Received : 2020.08.20
  • Accepted : 2020.10.21
  • Published : 2020.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to investigate meaningful relationship between technology appraisal indices and SMEs' financial performances for their continuous growth. The empirical data for this study were based on the technology appraisal results of Korea Technology Finance Corporation(KOTEC) and the financial data of the following 2 years 0f 3,688 SMEs. The meaningful differences between SMEs with superb financial performances and the others, by using t-test analysis, statistically were verified in 25 indices(75.8%) out of total 33 indices. All of five independent variables, namely CEO's capability, technology manpower, R&D intensiveness, market competitiveness and investment feasibility, were verified to have a positive effect on business feasibility respectively and business feasibility also has a positive influence on financial performance, such as sales growth, labor productivity and financial stability.

본 연구는 중소·벤처기업에 대한 기술평가 및 기술금융 지원사업이 기업의 경영성과를 향상시키고 성장기반을 확보하는데 유용한 수단인지 여부를 검증하기 위해 기술보증기금이 직접 기술평가 및 보증을 지원한 3,688개 기업을 표본기업으로 분석하였다. 먼저 대표적 경영성과 지표로서 재무건전성이 우수한 기업과 취약한 기업 간에 기술평가지표 세부 항목별로 유의미한 차이가 있는지 t검증을 실시한 결과, 총 33개 기술평가 세부항목 중 25개항목 (75.8%)에서 재무건전성이 우수한 기업집단과 그렇지 못한 기업집단 간에 기술평가의 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타나 기술평가지표의 유의성이 비교적 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 그리고 대표자역량, 경영진팀웍, 기술집약도, 시장경쟁력 및 투자타당성 등 5개 구성개념 속성들은 모두 기술사업성에 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치고, 기술사업성은 기업의 성장성, 노동생산성 및 재무건전성 등 경영성과에 모두 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Altman, E. I., Sabato, G., & Wilson, N.(2010). The value of non-financial information in small and medium-sized enterprise risk management. The Journal of Credit Risk, 6(2), 95-127. https://doi.org/10.21314/JCR.2010.110
  2. Cha, W. J.(2016). A study on Technology Evaluation of Technology Credit Bureau(TCB) for Technology Financing. Journal of the Korea management engineers society, 21(1), 71-93.
  3. Chen, S., Bu, M., Wu, S., & Liang, X.(2015). How does TMT attention to innovation of Chinese firms influence firm innovation activities? A study on the moderating role of corporate governance. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1127-1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.002
  4. Cho, H. J., & Lee, B. Y.(2016). Current issues and tasks: It is necessary to improve the effectiveness of the policy to support venture revitalization. Hyundai Economic Research Institute Issue Report, 16(13), 1-13.
  5. Financial Services Commission(2014). A plan to establish a technology evaluation system to vitalize technology finance.
  6. Grunert, J., Norden, L., & Weber, M.(2005). The role of non-financial factors in internal credit ratings. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(2), 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.05.017
  7. Huang, D. S.(2017). The Effect of Strategic Orientation and Network Capability on New Product Development Performance and Firm Performance of Technology-based Start-up. Master's Dissertation, Hanbat University, Korea.
  8. Kim, J. H.(2015). Problems and improvement measures of technology finance loans. Korea Intellectual Property Research Institute Issue & Focus on IP, 1-18.
  9. Kim, K. H.(2011). Technology Finance Status and Tasks. Science &Technology Policy, 21(3), 51-71.
  10. Kim, T. H., & Han, B. H.(2009). Association between technology evaluation grade and finantial Performance for small and medium sized enperprises. Korea Journal of Business Adminstration, 22(5), 2789-2808.
  11. Korea Technology Finance Corporation(2018). Regulations related to technology evaluation. Busan; Korea Technology Finance Corporation.
  12. Lee, J. S., & Kim, J. J.(2017). A Study on the Effective Combining Technology and Credit Appraisal Information in the Innovation Financing Market. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(1), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.1.199
  13. Lee, J. W., & Yun, J. Y.(2017). A Study on Suitability of Technology Appraisal Model in Technology Financing. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 20(2), 292-312.
  14. Lee, Y. H.(2017). A Study on Structural-relationship among Start-up's Technological Capability, Technological Competitiveness, Financial Stability and Default Risk. Doctoral Dissertation, Hoseo University, Korea.
  15. Lee, Y. H., & Sim, S. H.(2018). An Empirical Study on Venture & Inno-biz Enterprises' Technological Innovation from Resource-Based View. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(3), 36-60.
  16. Lee, Y. H., & Yang, D. W.(2017). An Structural-relationship Study on the Effect of Venture Start-up's Technological Capability on Possibility of Insolvency. Journal of Technology Innovation, 25(1), 36-60. https://doi.org/10.14386/SIME.2017.25.2.36
  17. Leung, D. Y., Lam, T. H., & Chan, S. S.(2010). Three versions of Perceived Stress Scale: validation in a sample of Chinese cardiac patients who smoke. BMC Public Health Research Article, 10(513), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-1
  18. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy(2016). Technology Evaluation Standard Operation Guidelines. https://motie.go.kr/motie/ms/nt/gosi/bbs/bbsView.do?bbs_seq_n=62802&bbs_cd_n=5.
  19. Nam, S. H.(2009). Current status and development direction of technology finance. The Korean Journal of Financial Engineering 2009 Conference presentation, 1-20.
  20. Nunnally, J. C.(1978). Psychometric theory(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  21. OECD(2006). The SME Financing Gap (Vol. I): Theory and Evidence. OECD Publishing.
  22. OECD(2014). Entrepreneuship at a glance. OECD Publishing.
  23. Osawa, Y., & Miyazaki, K.(2006). An empirical analysis of the valley of death: Large scale R&D project performance in a Japanese diversified company. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 14(2), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2006.9668620
  24. Park, S. C., & Yang, D. W.(2010). The Empirical Study on Relationship between SMEs' Technology Evaluation Index and Technology Commercialization Performance. Korea Journal of Business Adminstration, 23(1), 41-63.
  25. Reichert, F. M., & Zawislak, P. A.(2014). echnological Capability and Firm Performance. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(4), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000400002
  26. Shan, J.(2012). Accumulation of Technological Innovation Capability and Competitive Performance, International. Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 9(5), 18-20.
  27. Shin, D. H.(2015). The Efficient Production, Supply and Using of Technological Credit Information. The Korean Journal of Quantitative Finance, 1, 97-127.
  28. Smith, G. V., & Parr, R. L.(1994). Valuation of intellectual property and Intangible Assets. Second Edition.
  29. Song. J. Y.(2016). A Study on VRIO Framework Application to Strategic Technology Evaluation. Doctoral Dissertation, Pusan National University, Korea.
  30. Song. J. Y., & Sung, H. S.(2015). A Study on Relation between Strategic Attributes of Technological Resources and Competitive Advantage: Empirical Analysis of VRIO Framework by Using Technology Evaluation Results of Technology Based SMEs. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 18(3), 416-443.
  31. Yang, D. W.(2005). The Comparative Study of the relationship between Technology Valuation Index and performance in Ventures. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 8(3), 1175-1198.