벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제15권5호
  • /
  • Pages.13-35
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

스타트업 액셀러레이터의 투자결정요인에 대한 연구

A Study on the Determinants of Investment in Startup Accelerators

  • Heo, Joo-yeun (Management of Technology, Graduate School of Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2020.07.09
  • 심사 : 2020.10.28
  • 발행 : 2020.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

스타트업 액셀러레이터는 초기창업자들이 겪는 애로사항을 직접적으로 해결해 줄 수 있는 교육, 멘토링, 네트워킹, 공간, 시드머니(Seed money)등을 제공하고 일정 지분을 받는 새로운 형태의 투자주체이다(Clarysse, 2016). 스타트업 액셀러레이터들은 이들이 스타트업 생태계에 미치는 영향력이 입증되면서 전 세계적으로 확산되고 있다(Pauwels et al., 2016; Cohen & Hochberg, 2014). 본 연구는 이처럼 전 세계적으로 주요한 투자주체로 부상하고 있는 스타트업 액셀러레이터들의 투자결정요인을 도출하는 연구를 진행하였다. 먼저, 관련 선행연구가 부재한 상황이므로 정성적 메타합성법, 관련 자료조사, 관찰, 심층인터뷰의 과정을 거쳤다. 우선 창업초기 기업에 대한 투자결정요인에 대한 선행연구 30여 편을 선정하여 해당연구에 나타난 투자결정요인들을 정성적 메타합성법을 통해 비교·분석하였다. 그리고 액셀러레이터의 특성을 반영하기 위해서 액셀러레이터들의 평가과정에 대한 자료들을 조사하였으며, 실제로 이루어진 미국 액셀러레이터들의 스타트업 평가과정을 관찰하였다. 이 때 나타난 100여개의 질문을 근거이론의 코딩 기법을 활용하여 분석하였다. 더불어 미국 액셀러레이터들을 대상으로 심층 인터뷰를 진행하여 액셀러레이터의 특성과 주요 투자결정요인 등을 파악하였다. 이를 통해 최종적으로 5개 카테고리, 26개 세부 투자결정요인으로 이루어진 '액셀러레이터 형 투자결정요인'을 도출하였다. 그리고 이의 결과를 국내 액셀러레이터들의 검토를 받고 확정한 후, 국내 액셀러레이터를 대상으로 한 정량조사를 통해 각 카테고리 내, 중요도 및 우선순위를 살펴봄으로써 이의 신뢰성 및 액셀러레이터들이 중요하게 생각하는 투자결정요인 등을 확인하였다. 이렇게 액셀러레이터의 투자결정요인을 체계적으로 도출한 연구는 최초의 연구로써 후속연구들의 진행 및 스타트업 선정과정, 액셀러레이터의 투자결정 과정 등에 주요한 기여를 할 수 있으리라 기대한다.

Startup accelerators are a new type of investors providing a certain amount of shares for imparting education, mentoring, networking, and providing space and seed money that can directly resolve the difficulties faced by nascent entrepreneurs (Clarysse, 2016). Startup accelerators have expanded worldwide as their influence over the startup ecosystem has increasingly been established (Pauwels et al., 2016; Cohen & Hochberg, 2014). This study was conducted to derive investment determinants of startup accelerators that are emerging as major investment players around the world. To this end, the accelerator-type determinants of investment were derived. As previous research on this topic is nonexistent, this process involved qualitative meta-synthesis, literature reviews, observation, and in-depth interviews. First, more than 30 research papers were examined for the determinants of investment for firms at an early stage of their foundation, and the categories and determinants of investment in the relevant studies were comparatively analyzed using qualitative meta-synthesis. Further, related data were investigated to identify the characteristics of accelerators, and the startup evaluation process of US accelerators was studied. The more than 100 questions raised during this process were coded to examine the determinants of investment that accelerators considered important. In-depth interviews were conducted with four US accelerators to identify the characteristics of accelerators and key determinants of investment. Ultimately, 5 categories of accelerator-type determinants of investment and 26 subordinate determinants of investment were derived. The results were verified and supplemented by consulting with seven accelerators in Korea. The results were confirmed after pilot tests and verification by seven domestic accelerators. After confirming the accelerator-type determinants, the reliability of them was verified by examining the importance and priority of each category through the quantitative survey of Korean accelerators. The research that elicited the accelerator-type investment determinants is the first research and is expected to be a major reference to the progress of subsequent studies. This research that systematically derived the investment determinants of the accelerator is expected to make major contributions to the progress of follow-up studies, the process of selecting startups, and the investment decision-making process of the accelerators.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Argerich, J., Hormiga, E., & Valls-Pasola, J.(2013). Financial services support for entrepreneurial projects: key issues in the business angels investment decision process. The Service Industries Journal, 33(9-10), 806-819. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2013.719891
  2. Auerswald, P. E., & Branscomb, L. M. (2003). Valleys of Death and Darwinian Seas: Financing the Invention to Innovation Transition in the United States. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024980525678
  3. Bachher, J. S., & Guild, P. D.(1996). Financing early stage technology based companies: investment criteria used by investors. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 996.
  4. Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H.(1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276-287. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.618169
  5. Battistella, C., Toni, A. F. De, & Pessot, E.(2017). Open accelerators for start-ups success : a case study. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 80-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2015-0113
  6. Birdsall, M., Jones, C., Lee, C., Somerset, C., & Takaki, S. (2013). Business accelerators: The evolution of a rapidly growing industry. University of Cambridge, Cambridge(MBA Dissertation ad Judge Business School and Jesus College).
  7. Block, J., Fisch, C., Vismara, S., & Andres, R.(2019). Private equity investment criteria: An experimental conjoint analysis of venture capital, business angels, and family offices. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.009
  8. Carpentier, C., & Suret, J.-M.(2015). Angel group members' decision process and rejection criteria: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(6), 808-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.04.002
  9. Choi, Y. S., & Kim, D. H.(2016). A Comparative Study of the Accelerator and Venture Capital through Investment Behavior. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(4), 27-36.
  10. Cohen, S. L., & Bingham, C. B.(2013). How to Accelerate Learning: Entrepreneurial Ventures Participating in Accelerator Programs. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 14803-14803. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.14803abstract
  11. Cohen, S., & Hochberg, Y. V.(2014). Accelerating startups: The seed accelerator phenomenon.
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D.(2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  13. Drover, W., Busenitz, L., Matusik, S., Townsend, D., Anglin, A., & Dushnitsky, G.(2017). A Review and Road Map of Entrepreneurial Equity Financing Research: Venture Capital, Corporate Venture Capital, Angel Investment, Crowdfunding, and Accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820-1853. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317690584
  14. Dusatkova, M. S., & Zinecker, M.(2016). Valuing start-ups-selected approaches and their modification based on external factors. Business: Theory and Practice, 17, 335. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.17.11129
  15. Feeney, L., Haines Jr, G. H., & Riding, A. L.(1999). Private investors' investment criteria: insights from qualitative data. Venture Capital: An international journal of entrepreneurial finance, 1(2), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/136910699295938
  16. Fehder, D. C., & Hochberg, Y. V.(2014). Accelerators and the regional supply of venture capital investment. Available at SSRN 2518668.
  17. Festel, G., Wuermseher, M., & Cattaneo, G.(2013). Valuation of early stage high-tech start-up companies. International Journal of Business, 18(3), 216-231.
  18. Hallen, B. L., Bingham, C. B., & Cohen, S.(2014). Do accelerators accelerate? A study of venture accelerators as a path to success?. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 12955-12955.
  19. Hochberg, Y. V.(2016). Accelerating Entrepreneurs and Ecosystems: The Seed Accelerator Model. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 16(1), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1086/684985
  20. Hoffman, D. L., & Radojevich-Kelley, N.(2012). Analysis of Accelerator Companies: An Exploratory Case Study of Their Programs, Processes, and Early Results. Small Business Institute Journal, 8(2), 54-70.
  21. Isabelle, D.(2013). Key factors affecting a technology entrepreneur's choice of incubator or accelerator. Technology Innovation Management Review, 16-22.
  22. Jang, S. D.(2003). A Comparative Study of Succeeded and Failed Venture Firms. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Venture Studies, 6(3), 101-126.
  23. Jeong, S. R.(March 31, 2017). What we've learned in the Wi-combinator for three months. Platum. Retrieved from https://www.platum.kr.
  24. Jung, H. Y., & Yang, Y. S.(2007). Literature Studies for Testing validity of Business Model of High-tech Starts-up: Utilizing BMO Model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.2.2.200706.1
  25. Jung, K. H., & Choi, D. S.(2018). A Study on the Development of an Assessment Index for Selecting Start-ups on Balanced Scorecard. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(6), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.13.6.201812.49
  26. Jung, K. H., & Sung, C. S.(2018). A Study on the Verification of Significance of Assessment Items for Selecting Start-ups: Focusing on Project Fostering Start-ups through Leading Universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(4), 13-22.
  27. Kim, J. H., & Wagman, L.(2014). Portfolio size and information disclosure: An analysis of startup accelerators. Journal of Corporate Finance, 29, 520-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.10.017
  28. Kim, J. S., & Hong, D. H.(2013). Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Status and Operating Cases of Accelerators. Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, 28(5) 164-173.
  29. Kim, J. S., Lee, C. Y., Lee, W, J., & Kim, Y. T.(2013). Development of a selection evaluation model for discovering promising start-ups, KSIED.
  30. Kim, Y. J., & Yeom, S. H.(2014). Understanding and Policy Direction of Venture Accelerator. KISDI Premium Report, 19.
  31. Kohn, A., & Kohn, A.(2018). The determinants of startup valuation in the venture capital context: a systematic review and avenues for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 68(1), 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0131-5
  32. Koo, J. H, Kim, Y. J, Lee, S. Y, Kim, D. H & Baek, J. Y.(2019). A Study on the Factors Affecting Investment Decision of Korean Venture Capitalist. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(4), 1-18.
  33. KSIED.(2018). 2017 Survey on Start-up Companies. Daejeon; KSIED.
  34. Lee, H. Y., & Kim, J. S.(2017). The Impacts of Entrepreneurs' and Entrepreneurial Teams' Competency on the Performance of New Technology-based Startups. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 12(2), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.24878/tkes.2017.12.2.031
  35. Lee, H. Y., & Kim, J. S.(2018). A Study on the Entrepreneurial Competency Model in Early-and Late-Stage Technology-Based Ventures. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(4), 99-116.
  36. Lee, J.(2010). 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.009
  37. Lee, K. N.(2016). An Analysis of the Relative Priority of Intellectual Property e-learning Contents Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). The Journal of Intellectual Property, 11(1), 227-253. https://doi.org/10.34122/jip.2016.03.11.1.227
  38. Macmillan, I. C., Siegel, R., & Narasimha, P. N. S.(1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(85)90011-4
  39. Mason, C., & Stark, M.(2004). What do Investors Look for in a Business Plan?: A Comparison of the Investment Criteria of Bankers, Venture Capitalists and Business Angels. International Small Business Journal, 22(3), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604042377
  40. Maxwell, A. L., Jeffrey, S. A., & Levesque, M.(2011). Business angel early stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.002
  41. Merrifield, D. B.(1978). How to Select Successful R&D Projects. 67(12), 25-39.
  42. Miller, P & Bound, K(2011) The Start-Up Factory: the rise of accelerator programmes to support new technology ventures, NESTA, Discussion Paper.
  43. Osnabrugge, M. S. v.(1998). The financing of entrepreneurial firms in the UK: a comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures. Oxford University, UK.
  44. Padgett, D.(1998). Qualitative methods in social work research: challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
  45. Park, H. W.(2018a). Case analysis and implications of overseas accelerator institutions. KDB Survey Monthly, 749, 33-54.
  46. Park, I. S., & Ji, K. C.(2007). A Study about Developing the Evaluation Measures of Investment Validity for Venture Enterprises. The Korean Research Association For The Business Education, 18, 111-124.
  47. Park, S. H., Kim, B. B., & Kim, W. K.(2014). Ethnography methods utilizing the user observation study on product service system design: Focused on cosmetic store service. Journal of Digital Design, 14(1), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2014.14.1.022
  48. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
  49. Petersson, S., Mardstrom, V., Fornell, A., Westergard, V., Larsson, G., & Barrehag, L.(2012). Accelerating success: a study of seed accelerators and their defining characteristics.
  50. Petty, J. S., & Gruber, M.(2011). "In pursuit of the real deal". A longitudinal study of VC decision making. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(2), 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.002
  51. Picken, J. C.(2017). From startup to scalable enterprise: Laying the foundation. 60(5), 587-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.002
  52. Rostamzadeh, R., Ismail, K., & Zavadskas, E. K.(2014). Multi criteria decision making for assisting business angels in investments. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 696-720. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.984364
  53. Shah, A.(2017). Ethnography?: Participant observation, a potentially revolutionary praxis. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.1.008
  54. Shepherd, D. A.(1999). Venture Capitalists' Assessment of New Venture Survival. Management Science, 45(5), 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.5.621
  55. Smith, S. W., & Hannigan, T. J.(2015). Swinging for the fences: How do top accelerators impact the trajectories of new ventures. Druid, 15, 15-17.
  56. Stankeviciene, J., & Zinyte, S.(2012). Valuation Model Of New Start-Up Companies: Lithuanian Case. Mokslas : Lietuvos Ateitis, 4(3), 240.
  57. Stern, P., & Harris, C.(1985). Women's health and the self-care paradox: A model to guide self-care readiness-clash between the client and nurse. Health Care for Women International, 6(1-3), 151-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399338509515689
  58. Sudek, R.(2006). Angel investment criteria. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(2), 89-104.
  59. Timmons, J. A., Smollen, L. E., & Dingee, A. L. M. J.(1977). New venture creation: A guide to small business development (1st ed.). Homewood, IL: RD Irwin.
  60. White, B. A., & Dumay, J.(2018). The angel investment decision: insights from Australian business angels. Accounting and Finance.
  61. Yang, Y. S., & Kim, M. S.(2016). Case Study of Applying Self-Checkup Preparation for the Successful Technology Based Startup. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship,11(2), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.11.2.201604.113
  62. Yin, B., & Luo, J.(2018). How Do Accelerators Select Startups? Shifting Decision Criteria Across Stages. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(4), 574-589. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2791501
  63. Zinecker, M., & Bolf, D.(2015). Venture Capitalists' Investment Selection Criteria in CEE Countries and Russia. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, 16(1), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2015.441