DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Mutual Relationship between Korean Income Distribution during 1980s-1990s and Huge-scale Housing Supply Policy

한국의 80~90년대 소득분배와 대규모 주택공급정책의 상호관계에 관한 연구

  • 임재빈 (충남대학교 국가정책대학원)
  • Received : 2020.10.03
  • Accepted : 2020.10.13
  • Published : 2020.10.30

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between the improvement of the income distribution index from the late 1980s to the 1990s and large-scale housing supply projects such as the 2 million housing construction project. Looking at Korea's economic development in terms of income growth and distribution, GDP has continuously increased since the establishment of the government, especially in the late 1980s. The Gini Index, a representative income inequality index, rapidly deteriorated in the early 1970s, and gradually improved from the late 1980s. The 2 million housing construction project, announced in 1988, supplied a third of the existing nationwide housing stock of 6.5 million units in three years. The project cost was 65 trillion won, equivalent to 50% of Korea's GDP at the time. This study questioned whether the ratio of the number of employed workers in the construction industry was a variable directly affecting the Gini Index. To verify this, the causal relationship between the proportion of employed workers in the construction and manufacturing industries and the Gini Index from 1979 to 2008 was statistically analyzed. For this, the ARIMA model was established for each variable, and the correlation of their residuals was verified. The 2 million housing construction project had the effect of improving income inequality in terms of rising wages for production workers and creating jobs for the low-educated and low-income class. During the project period, the number of middle-income earners increased sharply, and the income gap between the high-income and low-income earners greatly decreased. The expansion of the construction volume can be used as a powerful and direct policy tool for improving income distribution. However, the effect may be limited. When the proportion of workers exceeds the threshold, the effect is weakened.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토해양부(1993), "우리 국토 이렇게 달라졌다: 건설행정백서(1988-1992)".
  2. 김안제(1982), "토지정책과 국민경제", 토지문제집, 한국토지개발공사, 45-48.
  3. 김원(1986), 도시정책론, 경영문화원, 203-206.
  4. 김유배(2006),노동경제학, 제2판, 박영사.
  5. 박해남(2019), "서울올림픽과 도시개조의 유산: 인정경관과 낙인경관의 탄생", 문화와 사회, 27(2): 445-499.
  6. 방하남(1999), "건설업 일용 노동시장의 구조와 과정: 고용, 임금 및 근로조건을 중심으로", 한국사회학, 제33집(봄호), 191-225.
  7. 배무기(2002), 노동경제학, 전정판, 도서출판 경문사.
  8. 성명재(2001). "소득분배 변화 추이와 결정요인 분석: 도시가구를 중심으로". KIPF.
  9. 심규범(2009), "건설업의 일자리 구조 변화와 정책 방향", 월간 노동리뷰, 2009.4월호, 42-59.
  10. 안종범(2003), "한국경제 발전모형의 정립을 위한 쿠즈네츠가설의 재검토", 경제학연구, 51(3): 5-30.
  11. 우제화(1986), "택지개발사업의 산업연관분석에 관한 연구: 한국토지개발공사 사례를 중심으로", 서울대학교 환경대학원 환경계획학과 석사학위논문.
  12. 원종학.성명재(2007), "소득분배 격차 확대의 원인과 정책대응 방향", 연구보고서, 한국조세연구원.
  13. 윤기중(1994), "소득요인별 불평등도 분해: 도시근로가구소득을 중심으로", 연세경제연구, 1: 5-37.
  14. 이명운(1990), "노동 운동의 성격 및 활동변화", 월간 경영계, 152: 8-11.
  15. 이종원(2004), 한국경제론, 제2판, 도서출판 해남.
  16. 이종협(2007), 시계열분석과 응용, 자유아카데미.
  17. 이준구(2002), 미시경제학, 법문사.
  18. 임재빈(2010), "한국의 근대화와 도시전략의 유효성: 주택200만호 건설사업을 중심으로", 서울대학교 대학원 건설환경공학부 석사학위논문.
  19. 지주형(2016), "강남 개발과 강남적 도시성의 형성", 한국지역지리학회지, 22(2): 307-330.
  20. 최영섭(2005), "제조업의 일자리 창출", KIET산업경제, 2005년 5월호, 3-18.
  21. Box, G. E. and G. M. Jenkins (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control San Francisco. Calif: Holden-Day.
  22. Doeringer, P. B. and M. J. Piore (1971), Internal labor markets and manpower analysis, MA: Health.
  23. Jorgensen, N. O. (1975), "Housing France for Low Income Groups", Bouwcertrum-Rotterdam, 38-46.
  24. Kuznets, S. (1955), "Economic growth and income inequality", American Economic Review, 45(1): 1-28.
  25. Lewis, A. W. (1954), "Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour", Manchester School Economics and Social Studies, 22: 139-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1954.tb00021.x
  26. Perkins, D. H. (1980), "Income Distribution in Korea", in Edward S. Mason et al., The Economic and social Modernization of the Republic of Korea, Harvard University Press.
  27. Wachter, M. L., R. A. Gordon, M. J. Piore and R. E. Hall (1974), "Primary and secondary labor markets: A critique of the dual approach", Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, 1974(3): 637-693. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534250