DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Effectiveness of the University Convergence Curriculum using the CIPP model

CIPP 모형을 활용한 대학 융복합 교육과정의 효과성 분석

  • Kang, Kyunghee (Innovation Center for University Education, Kongju National University)
  • 강경희 (공주대학교 대학교육혁신센터)
  • Received : 2020.07.06
  • Accepted : 2020.09.20
  • Published : 2020.09.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of university convergence curriculum using CIPP model. With 758 data surveys of professors and students participating in K University's convergence education, the analysis of differences according to group characteristics and the factors affecting performance recognition and course satisfaction were analyzed. As a result of analysis, first, class activity(CA) was the highest (M=3.85), and coursework design(CD) was the lowest (M=3.35), and there were significant differences in the course objectives, course content, and class activities according to the characteristics of the group. Second, the factors affecting the performance recognition and course satisfaction of the convergence curriculum were needs analysis, coursework design, learner activity, performance recognition, and course satisfaction. In conclusion, it suggests that from the planning stage, it should be designed to reflect the needs of professors and students, and to improve satisfaction and performance recognition with novel contents and active teaching and learning activities. This study can be used as basic data for improving the quality of the convergence curriculum.

본 연구의 목적은 CIPP 모형을 활용하여 대학 융복합 교육과정의 효과성을 분석하는 것이다. K대학의 융복합 교육에 참여한 교수와 학생을 대상으로 조사한 758개의 데이터로 집단 특성에 따른 차이 분석과 성과인식과 교과만족도에 미치는 영향 요인을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 먼저, 수업활동(CA)이 가장 높았고(M=3.85), 교과이수설계(CD)가 가장 낮았으며(M=3.35), 집단의 특성에 따라 교과목표와 교과내용, 수업활동에 유의미한 차이가 있다. 둘째, 융복합 교육 과정의 성과인식과 교과만족도에 미치는 영향 요인으로는 요구반영과 교과이수설계, 학습자활동, 성과인식, 교과만족도로 나타났다. 결론적으로 기획단계에서부터 교수와 학생의 요구를 반영하여 설계하고, 참신한 내용과 적극적인 교수학습활동으로 만족도와 성과인식을 높여야 함을 시사한다. 본 연구는 융복합 교육과정의 질적 개선을 위한 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Y. Lee. (2011). Development of a liberal education Curriculum for the Convergent knowledge education. Korean Journal of General Education, 5(2), 11-37.
  2. H. Y. Kim. (2013). The proposition of the directions about convergence-based courses and basic-convergence subjects for systemed convergence education, Korean Journal of General Education, 7(2), 11-38.
  3. Kongju National University. (2018). 2017 Collage Convergence Course Development Report. Chungnam: Kongju National University.
  4. K. H. Kang & E. K. Kim. (2019). A Needs Analysis for Implementation of Competency Based Convergence Curriculum in University using Revised IPA. Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 29(3), 119-139. DOI: 10.21024/pnuedi.29.3.201909.119
  5. Y. J. Seo. (2019). A Student Survey on Interdisciplinary Major - A Preliminary Study for the Implementation of Convergent Curriculum. Korean Journal of General Education, 13(3), 229-247.
  6. D. L. Stufflebeam. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 5, 19-25.
  7. H. S. Jeong, Y. R. Woo & C. C. Lee. (2019). An Evaluation Study on the Effectiveness of National Cyber Crime Prevention Education Program: Based on the CIPP Model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(2), 9-18. DOI: 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.009
  8. J. H. Jeon & J. E. Lee. (2013). A Study on Satisfaction of New Employee Engineering Introduction Training Program Applying CIPP Evaluation Model Focusing on D Corporation. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 16(3), 79-86. DOI: 10.18108/jeer.2013.16.3.79
  9. C. H. Park. (2020). A Study of the Development of Green Camp Evaluation Index based on the CIPP Model, Journal of the Korea Contents Society, 20(3), 491-505. DOI: 10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.03.491
  10. S. H. Lee & M. S. Choi. (2016). Developing Evaluation Factors of College-level Learning Community Program based on Stufflebeam's 7-CIPP Evaluation Model. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28(3), 471-496. DOI: 10.35873/ajmahs.2016.6.10.009
  11. H. S. Bae. (2008). Theory-driven educational program evaluation. Seoul: Onemisa.
  12. W. S. Lee. (2019). The orientation principles of the CIPP evaluation model and its application in Korean educational research practices. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 32(4), 603-624.
  13. D. L. Stufflebeam. (2007). CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist (2nd ed). [Online]https://www.wmich.edu/sites/default/ files/attachments/u350/2014/cippchecklist_mar07.pdf
  14. S. H. Lee & M. S. Choi. (2016). Developing Evaluation Factors of College-level Learning Community Program based on Stufflebeam's 7-CIPP Evaluation Model. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 28(3), 471-496. DOI: 10.17927/tkjems.2016.28.3.471
  15. W. S. Lee. (2013). Why do we evaluate a program?. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 26(1), 1-13.