참고문헌
- 교육부(2015). 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제205-74호.
- 교육부(2018). 초등학교 3, 4, 5, 6학년 과학교과서. 서울: (주)비상.
- 김경순, 신은주, 한재영, 노태희(2006). 비유를 사용한 화학 개념 학습에서 유발되는 대응 오류와 개념 이해도의 관계. 대한화학회지, 50(6), 486-493. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2006.50.6.486
- 김범기, 이항로, 김기정(1996). 천문 개념 취도와 공간 능력과의 상관관계에 관한 연구. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 24(2), 216-225.
- 김순식, 이용섭(2017). '계절 변화'에 대한 탐구적 과학글쓰기 수업이 초등학생들의 과학학습동기 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 10(3), 278-289. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2017.10.3.278
- 명전옥(2001). 예비교사들의 지구과학 문제 해결 실패 요인: 달과 행성의 운동을 중심으로. 한국지구과학회지, 22(5), 339-349.
- 박종윤, 남정희, 유희선(2000). 상호작용을 강화한 형성 평가 수업전략이 중학교 과학학습에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(3), 468-478.
- 서동욱(2004). 야외 지질 학습장의 퇴적암과 지질 구조에 관한 초등학생들의 관찰 및 가설 분석. 한국지구과학회지, 25(7), 586-594.
- 송신철, 심규철(2018). 고등학교 통합과학 교과서에 나타난 탐구활동 유형 분석. 생물교육, 46(1), 24-38.
- 이창진, 홍석의(2003). 고등학교 학생을 위한 가상지질조사 웹 컨텐츠 개발: 제주도 송악산과 지삿개를 중심으로. 한국지구과학회지, 24(3), 172-180.
- 임성만(2015). 우리나라 역대 초등학교 교과서에서 다루어진 '지구과학' 영역의 중심개념과 탐구활동 분석 및 차기 교과서 개선 방안 모색. 초등과학교육, 34(3), 288-296.
- 임성만(2018). 우리나라와 싱가포르 초등과학교과서에 제시된 개념 및 탐구활동 요소 비교 분석: 지질 관련 내용을 중심으로. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 11(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2018.11.1.38
- 임성만(2019). 초등과학 교과서 지질 분야의 지역화 자료 개발의 필요성과 방향: '지층과 화석' 단원을 중심으로. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 12(3), 184-197. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2019.12.3.184
- 임청환, 정진우(1993). 국민학교 자연과 천문분야 내용분석과 문제점. 한국과학교육학회지, 13(2), 247-256.
- 정수연, 장정호(2019). 2009 개정과 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 생명과학II 교과서의 탐구활동 유형 분석. 현장과학교육, 14(2), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.14.2.202005.160
- 한영욱, 샘재윤(2005). 초등학교 암석원의 실태분서 및 암석단원 지도를 위한 효과적인 방안 모색. 부산교육대학교 논문집, 7(1), 59-78.
- 허숙(2009). 국가교육과정 정책의 방향과 과제. 교육과정연구, 27(3), 1-13.
- Almendingen, S. F., Klepaker, T. & Tveita, J. (2003). Tenke det, onske det, ville det med, men gjore det ... ?: en evaluering av natur-og miljofag etter Reform 97 [Thinking, desiring, wanting, but doing? An evaluation of the school subject science and environmental subjects after Reform 97]. Retrived July 15, 2020, from https:// nordopen.nord.no/nord-xmlui/handle/11250/145676
- Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Techer Education, 13(1), 1-12.
- Ball, D. L. & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teacher’s guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401-423. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179386
- Bell, R. L., Smetana, L. & Binns, I. (20050. Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
- Caliskan, O. (2011). Virtual field trips in education of earth and environment sciences. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3239-3243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.278
- Chiappetta, E. & Fillman, D. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1847-1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601159407
- Chinn C. A., & Malhotra B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- Colaizzi, P. E. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it existential phenomenology. New York: Oxford University press.
- Constantinou, C. P. Tsivitanidou, O. E. & Rybska, E. (2018). What Is Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning?. In O. E. Tsivitanidou et al. (Eds), Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning (pp. 1-23). Contributions from Science Education Research 5.
- DiGiuseppe, M. (2014). Representing nature of science in a science textbook: Exploring author-editor–publisher interactions. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1061-1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.840405
- Duschl, R. & Smith, M. (2001). "Earth science", Brophy, J. (Ed), Subject-specific instructional methods and activities (Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 8) (pp. 269-290). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley.
- Hofstein A. & Lunetta V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
- Huberman, A. M. & Miles, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Hubisz, J. (2003). Middle-school texts don't make the grade. Physics Today, 56(5), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1583534
- Kesidou, S. & Roseman, J. E. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061s curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 522-549. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10035
- Kusnick, J. (2002). Growing pebbles and conceptual prisms-Understanding the sources of student misconceptions about rock formation. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-50.1.31
- Leite, L. (1999). Heat and temperature: An analysis of how these concepts are dealt with in textbooks. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976990220106
- Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A. & Eylon, B. (2004). The scaffolded knowledge integration framework for instruction. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis & P. Bell (Eds), Internet environments for science education (pp. 47-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. Alexsandria, VA: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P. & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
- Orgill, M. K. & Bodner, G. M. (2004). Locks and keys: How analogies are used and perceived in biochemistry classes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the NARST, Vancouver, BC.
- Ramasundaram, V., Grunwald, S., Mageot, A. & Comerford, N. B. (2005). Development of an environmental virtual laboratory. Computer and Education, 45(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.03.002
- Rillero, P. (2010). The rise and fall of science education: A content analysis of Science in elementary reading textbooks of the 19th century. School Science and Mathematics Journal, 110(5), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00034.x
- Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learning science: Implication for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 969-983. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310910
- Roseman, J. E., Kulm, G. & Shuttleworth, S. (2001). Putting textbooks to the test. ENC Focus, 8(3), 56-59.
- Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., Mckinney, L. & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning Science through Research Apprenticeships: A Critical Reviewof the Literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20326
- Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G. & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authenticcontext: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610-645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128
- Schwarz, C. V., Gunckel, K. L., Smith, E. L., Covitt, B. A., Bae, M., Enfield, M. & Tsurusaki, B. K. (2008). Helping elementary preservice teachers learn to use curriculum materials foreffective science teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 345-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20243
- Shamsudin, N. M., Abdullah, N. & Yaamat, N. (2013). Strategies of teaching science using an inquiry based science education(IBSE) by novice chemistry teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 583-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.129
- Stern, L. & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 538-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20019
- Stoffels, N. T. (2005). "There is a worksheet to be followed": A case study of a science teacher's use of learning support texts for practical work. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2005.10740585
- Suarez, M. L. (2011). The relationship between inquirybased science instruction and student achievement. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Mississiphi, USA.
- Thomas, W. J. (2000). A review of research on project based learning. San Farael, CA: Autodes Foundation.
- Wickman, P. O. (2004), The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10129
- Wier, B., Cain, B. J. & Fredricks, K. (2000). "Living inside the earth", Children's preconceptions about how we addressed them. Paper Presented at the National Conference of the National Science Teachers Association, Orlando, FL.
- Yager, R. E. (1996). Science/Technology/Society as reform in science education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.