Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a structure analytic hierarchy approach for the evaluation of the physical protection system effectiveness

  • Zou, Bowen (School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology) ;
  • Wang, Wenlin (School of Automation, Wuhan University of Technology) ;
  • Liu, Jian (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Monitoring Technology and Equipment, China Guangdong Nuclear Power Engineering, Design Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Yan, Zhenyu (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Monitoring Technology and Equipment, China Guangdong Nuclear Power Engineering, Design Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Liu, Gaojun (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Monitoring Technology and Equipment, China Guangdong Nuclear Power Engineering, Design Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Wang, Jun (School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology) ;
  • Wei, Guanxiang (School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology)
  • Received : 2019.03.16
  • Accepted : 2020.01.31
  • Published : 2020.08.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A physical protection system (PPS) is used for the protection of critical facilities. This paper proposes a structure analytic hierarchy approach (SAHA) for the hierarchical evaluation of the PPS effectiveness in critical infrastructure. SAHA is based on the traditional analysis methods "estimate of adversary sequence interruption, EASI". A community algorithm is used in the building of the SAHA model. SAHA is applied to cluster the associated protection elements for the topological design of complicated PPS with graphical vertexes equivalent to protection elements.

Keywords

References

  1. T. Lovecek, J. Vaculík, L. Kittel, Qualitative approach to evaluation of critical infrastructure security systems, Eur. J.Secur.Saf. 1 (1) (2012) 1-11.
  2. M. Coole, J. Corkill, A. Woodward, Defence in Depth, Protection in Depth and Security in Depth: A Comparative Analysis towards a Common Usage Language, 2012.
  3. R. Nunes-Vaz, S. Lord, Designing physical security for complex infrastructures, Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct.Protect. 7 (3) (2014) 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2014.06.003
  4. C.D. Jaeger, N.S. Roehrig, T. Torres, Development of an Automated Security Risk Assessment Methodology Tool for Critical Infrastructures, Sandia report, 2008.
  5. F. Argenti, G. Landucci, V. Cozzani, et al., A study on the performance assessment of anti-terrorism physical protection systems in chemical plants, Saf. Sci. 94 (2017) 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.11.022
  6. Z. Vintr, M. Vintr, J. Malach, Evaluation of physical protection system effectiveness. Security Technology (ICCST), in: 2012 IEEE International Carnahan Conference on, IEEE, 2012, pp. 15-21.
  7. M.L. Garcia, The Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems, second ed., Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA, 2008.
  8. M.L. Garcia, Vulnerability Assessment of Physical Protection Systems, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA, 2006.
  9. H.A. Bennett, EASI Approach to Physical Security Evaluation, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, 1977. SAND-760500.
  10. D.W. Whithead, C.S. Potter, S.L. O'Connor, Nuclear Power Plant Security Assessment Technical Manual, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, 2007. SAND-007-5591.
  11. S.A.V.I. Sandia National Laboratory, Systematic Analysis of Vulnerability to Intrusion, SAND89-0926, Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM, 1989.
  12. R.A. Al-Ayat, T.D. Cousins, E.R. Hoover, ASSESS Update - Current Status and Future Developments, UCRL-JC-104360, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1990.
  13. S.S. Jang, S.W. Kwak, H. Yoo, J.S. Kim, W.K. Yoon, Development of a vulnerability assessment code for a physical protection system: systematic analysis of physical protection effectiveness (SAPE), Nucl. Eng.Technol 41 (5) (2009) 747-752. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.2009.41.5.747
  14. V.D. Blondel, J.L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, et al., Fast unfolding of communities in large networks, J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp. 2008 (10) (2008) P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
  15. U.N. Raghavan, R. Albert, S. Kumara, Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks, Phys. Rev.E 76 (3) (2007), 036106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036106
  16. J. Shi, J. Malik, Normalized cuts and image segmentation, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22 (8) (2000) 888-905. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.868688
  17. B.W. Kernighan, S. Lin, An efficient heuristic procedure for partitioning graphs, Bell .Syst.Tech.J 49 (2) (1970) 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb01770.x
  18. F. Sayadi, Y. Said, M. Atri, et al., Physical Protection Systems and Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Czech Republic. Recent Researches in Automatic Control, Systems Science and Communications, 2012.
  19. Sadia, Adversary Sequence Diagram (ASD) Model, International Training Course on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Facilities and Materials, 2018 (Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA).
  20. International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities (INFCIRC/225/Revision 5), IAEA Nuclear Security Series No. 13, IAEA, Vienna, 2011.
  21. J. Wood, Control Room Design, Human factors for engineers, 2004, pp. 203-233.
  22. M.E.J. Newman, Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks, Phys. Rev.E 69 (6) (2004), 066133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066133
  23. M.E.J. Newman, Detecting community structure in networks, Eur. Phys. J.B 38 (2) (2004) 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00124-y
  24. B. Everitt, A. Skrondal, The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002, p. 96.
  25. Y.A. Setiawan, S.S. Chirayath, E.D. Kitcher, MAPPS: a stochastic computational tool for multi-path analysis of physical protection systems, Ann. Nucl. Energy (2019) 107074.
  26. F. Argenti, G. Landucci, G. Reniers, et al., Vulnerability assessment of chemical facilities to intentional attacks based on Bayesian Network, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 169 (2018) 515-530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.023

Cited by

  1. Modeling and Simulation as Tools to Increase the Protection of Critical Infrastructure and the Sustainability of the Provision of Essential Needs of Citizens vol.13, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115898