참고문헌
- Ah, H. Y. (2018). A Study of Counter-Arguments as Observed in Debate of High School Students (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Pusan national university, Pusan.
- Baek, Y. K. (1989). The Educational Potentials of Expert Systems. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 79-91.
- Beggrow, E. P., Ha, M., Nehm, R. H., Pearl, D., & Boone, W. J. (2014). Assessing scientific practices using machine-learning methods: How closely do they match clinical interview performance?. Journal of Science education and Technology, 23(1), 160-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9461-9
- Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
- Bridgeman, B., Trapani, C., & Attali, Y. (2012). Comparison of human and machine scoring of essays: Differences by gender, ethnicity, and country. Applied Measurement in Education, 25(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2012.635502
- Buchanan, B. G., & Feigenbaum, E. A. (1980). The stanford heuristic programming project: Goals and activities. AI Magazine, 1(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v1i1.89
- Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine learning, 20(3), 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
- Cho, H. S., & Nam, J. (2014). The impact of the argument-based modeling strategy using scientific writing implemented in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 583-592. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0583
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32(1), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Engin, G., Aksoyer, B., Avdagic, M., Bozanli, D., Hanay, U., Maden, D., & Ertek, G. (2014). Rule-based Expert Systems for Supporting University Students. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.241
- Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
- Fernandez-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S., & Amorim, D. (2014). Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?. The journal of machine learning research, 15(1), 3133-3181.
- Giarratano, J. C., & Riley, G. (1998). Expert systems: Principles and programming. Boston: PWS.
- Ha, M. (2016). Scoring Korean Written Responses Using English-Based Automated Computer Scoring Models and Machine Translation: A Case of Natural Selection Concept Test. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(3), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0389
- Ha, M., Lee, G.-G., Shin, S., Lee, J.-K., Choi, S., Choo, J., Kim, N., Lee, H., Lee, J., Lee, J., Jo, Y., Kang, K., & Park, J. (2019). Assessment as a Learning-Support Tool and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence: WA3I Project Case. School Science Journal, 13(3), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.15737/SSJ.13.3.201908.271
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodriguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
- Jun, C.-H. (2015). Data mining techniques. Seoul: Hannarea Publishing Co.
- Kang, N.-H., & Lee, E. K. (2013). Argument and argumentation: A review of literature for clarification of translated words. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(6), 1119-1138. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1119
- Kang, S. M., Kwak, K. H., & Nam, J. H. (2006). The effects of argumentation-based teaching and learning strategy on cognitive development, science concept understanding, science-related attitude, and argumentation in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(3), 450-461.
- Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International journal of science education, 20(7), 849-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200707
- Kevin P. Murphy. (2012). Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- KICE(Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation). (2006). A Study on the Development and Introduction of an Automated Scoring Program(RRI 2006-6). Retrieved from http://kice.re.kr/resrchBoard/view.do?seq=19388&s=kice&m=030102
- Kil, H.-h. (2018). The Study of Korean Stopwords list for Text mining. The Korean Language and Literature, 78, 1-25.
- Kim, M., & Ryu, S. (2019). Development of Scientific Conceptual Understanding through Process-Centered Assessment that Visualizes the Process of Scientific Argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 651-668.
- Kim, S. J. (2019). A Study on the Extraction and Validation of Automatic Argumentative Writing Scoring Feature Using Text Mining (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Korea national university of education, Chung-Buk.
- KOFAC (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity) (2019). Scientific Literacy for All Koreans, Korean Science Education Standards for the Next Generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
- Kwon, J.-S., & Kim, H.-B. (2016). Exploring small group argumentation shown in designing an experiment: Focusing on students' epistemic goals and epistemic considerations for activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0045
- Lantz, B. (2013). Machine learning with R. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd.
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Lee, D., Yeon, J., Hwang, I., & Lee, S. (2010). KKMA: A tool for utilizing sejong corpus based on relational database. Journal of KIISE: Computing Practices and Letters, 16(11), 1046-1050.
- Lee, G.-G., Ha, H., Hong, H.-G., & Kim, H.-B. (2018). Exploratory Research on Automating the Analysis of Scientific Argumentation Using Machine Learning. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.2.219
- Lee H.-J., & Park Y.-M. (2019). A Study on the Search for Automatic Scoring Variables by Comparison of Text Studies Using Natural Language Processing. The research in writing, 41, 255-287.
- Lee, H.-S., Pallant, A., Pryputniewicz, S., Lord, T., Mulholland, M., & Liu, O. L. (2019). Automated text scoring and real-time adjustable feedback: Supporting revision of scientific arguments involving uncertainty. Science Education, 103(3), 590-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21504
- Lee, S., & Nam, J. (2016). Impact of Student Assessment Activities on Reflective Thinking in High School Argument-Based Inquiry. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(2), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0347
- Lee, S., & Nam, J. (2018). Impact of Student Assessment Activities on Claim and Evidence Formation in High School Argument-Based Inquiry. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 62(3), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2018.62.3.203
- Linn, M. C., Gerard, L., Ryoo, K., McElhaney, K., Liu, O. L., & Rafferty, A. N. (2014). Computer-guided inquiry to improve science learning. Science, 344(6180), 155-156. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245980
- Liu, O. L., Rios, J. A., Heilman, M., Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Validation of automated scoring of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21299
- Mao, L., Liu, O. L., Roohr, K., Belur, V., Mulholland, M., Lee, H. S., & Pallant, A. (2018). Validation of automated scoring for a formative assessment that employs scientific argumentation. Educational Assessment, 23(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2018.1427570
- Martin, T., & Sherin, B. (2013). Learning analytics and computational techniques for detecting and evaluating patterns in learning: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 511-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.840466
- McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
- McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In M. Lovett, & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data: The proceedings of 33rd Carnegie symposium on cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Negnevitsky, M. (2005). Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
- Nehm, R. H., Ha, M., & Mayfield, E. (2012). Transforming biology assessment with machine learning: automated scoring of written evolutionary explanations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9300-9
- Ong, N., Litman, D., & Brusilovsky, A. (2014). Ontology-based argument mining and automatic essay scoring. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 24-28). Baltimore, MD.
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Park, C., Kim, Y, Kim, J, Song, J., & Choi, H. (2015). R data mining. Seoul: Kyowoo.
- Park, E. L., & Cho, S. (2014). KoNLPy: Korean natural language processing in Python. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Human & Cognitive Language Technology (pp. 133-136). Chuncheon, Korea.
- Park, J., & Kim, H.-B. (2018). Exploring Teachers' Responsive Teaching Practice in Argumentation-Based Science Classroom: Focus on Structural and Dialogical Aspects of Argument. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.1.69
- Ripley, B., & Venables, W. (2020). Package 'nnet'. R package version, 7.3-14. Retrieved April 28, 2020, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nnet
- Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Harlow: Pearson.
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science education, 92(3), 447-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
- Shen, L. (2019). A Study on Functions of Korean Discourse Markers (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Yonsei University, Seoul.
- Shin, H. S. & Kim, H.-J. (2012). Development of the Analytic Framework for Dialogic Argumentation Using the TAP and a Diagram in the Context of Learning the Circular Motion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 1007-1026. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.5.1007
- Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International journal of science education, 28(2-3), 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957
- Song, J., Kang, S. J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., ... & Son, Y. A. (2019). Contents and Features of' Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)'for the Next Generation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 39(3), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.465
- Song, M.-Y., Noh, E.-H., & Sung, K.-H. (2016). Analysis on the Accuracy of Automated Scoring for Korean Large-scale Assessments. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(1), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2016.19.1.255
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Yang, I. H., Lee, H. J., Lee, H. N., & Cho, H. J. (2009). The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 29(2), 203-220.
- Yoo, J. E. (2015). Random forests, an alternative data mining technique to decision tree. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 28(2), 427-448.
- Yoo. J. E. (2019). Machine Learning for Large-scale/Panel Data and Learning Analytics Data Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 313-338. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.35.2.313
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008
피인용 문헌
- 기계 학습을 활용한 논증 수준 자동 채점 및 논증 패턴 분석 vol.41, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2021.41.3.203