1 |
Fernandez-Delgado, M., Cernadas, E., Barro, S., & Amorim, D. (2014). Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?. The journal of machine learning research, 15(1), 3133-3181.
|
2 |
Giarratano, J. C., & Riley, G. (1998). Expert systems: Principles and programming. Boston: PWS.
|
3 |
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32.
DOI
|
4 |
Ha, M. (2016). Scoring Korean Written Responses Using English-Based Automated Computer Scoring Models and Machine Translation: A Case of Natural Selection Concept Test. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(3), 389-397.
DOI
|
5 |
Ha, M., Lee, G.-G., Shin, S., Lee, J.-K., Choi, S., Choo, J., Kim, N., Lee, H., Lee, J., Lee, J., Jo, Y., Kang, K., & Park, J. (2019). Assessment as a Learning-Support Tool and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence: WA3I Project Case. School Science Journal, 13(3), 271-282.
DOI
|
6 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodriguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
DOI
|
7 |
Jun, C.-H. (2015). Data mining techniques. Seoul: Hannarea Publishing Co.
|
8 |
Kang, S. M., Kwak, K. H., & Nam, J. H. (2006). The effects of argumentation-based teaching and learning strategy on cognitive development, science concept understanding, science-related attitude, and argumentation in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(3), 450-461.
|
9 |
Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International journal of science education, 20(7), 849-871.
DOI
|
10 |
Kevin P. Murphy. (2012). Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
|
11 |
KICE(Korea Institute Of Curriculum & Evaluation). (2006). A Study on the Development and Introduction of an Automated Scoring Program(RRI 2006-6). Retrieved from http://kice.re.kr/resrchBoard/view.do?seq=19388&s=kice&m=030102
|
12 |
Kil, H.-h. (2018). The Study of Korean Stopwords list for Text mining. The Korean Language and Literature, 78, 1-25.
|
13 |
Kim, M., & Ryu, S. (2019). Development of Scientific Conceptual Understanding through Process-Centered Assessment that Visualizes the Process of Scientific Argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 651-668.
|
14 |
Kim, S. J. (2019). A Study on the Extraction and Validation of Automatic Argumentative Writing Scoring Feature Using Text Mining (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Korea national university of education, Chung-Buk.
|
15 |
KOFAC (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity) (2019). Scientific Literacy for All Koreans, Korean Science Education Standards for the Next Generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
|
16 |
Kwon, J.-S., & Kim, H.-B. (2016). Exploring small group argumentation shown in designing an experiment: Focusing on students' epistemic goals and epistemic considerations for activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 45-61.
DOI
|
17 |
Lantz, B. (2013). Machine learning with R. Birmingham, UK: Packt Publishing Ltd.
|
18 |
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
DOI
|
19 |
Lee, G.-G., Ha, H., Hong, H.-G., & Kim, H.-B. (2018). Exploratory Research on Automating the Analysis of Scientific Argumentation Using Machine Learning. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(2), 219-234.
DOI
|
20 |
Lee, D., Yeon, J., Hwang, I., & Lee, S. (2010). KKMA: A tool for utilizing sejong corpus based on relational database. Journal of KIISE: Computing Practices and Letters, 16(11), 1046-1050.
|
21 |
Lee H.-J., & Park Y.-M. (2019). A Study on the Search for Automatic Scoring Variables by Comparison of Text Studies Using Natural Language Processing. The research in writing, 41, 255-287.
|
22 |
Lee, H.-S., Pallant, A., Pryputniewicz, S., Lord, T., Mulholland, M., & Liu, O. L. (2019). Automated text scoring and real-time adjustable feedback: Supporting revision of scientific arguments involving uncertainty. Science Education, 103(3), 590-622.
DOI
|
23 |
Lee, S., & Nam, J. (2016). Impact of Student Assessment Activities on Reflective Thinking in High School Argument-Based Inquiry. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 36(2), 347-360.
DOI
|
24 |
Lee, S., & Nam, J. (2018). Impact of Student Assessment Activities on Claim and Evidence Formation in High School Argument-Based Inquiry. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 62(3), 203-213.
DOI
|
25 |
Linn, M. C., Gerard, L., Ryoo, K., McElhaney, K., Liu, O. L., & Rafferty, A. N. (2014). Computer-guided inquiry to improve science learning. Science, 344(6180), 155-156.
DOI
|
26 |
Liu, O. L., Rios, J. A., Heilman, M., Gerard, L., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Validation of automated scoring of science assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(2), 215-233.
DOI
|
27 |
McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students' use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In M. Lovett, & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data: The proceedings of 33rd Carnegie symposium on cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
|
28 |
Mao, L., Liu, O. L., Roohr, K., Belur, V., Mulholland, M., Lee, H. S., & Pallant, A. (2018). Validation of automated scoring for a formative assessment that employs scientific argumentation. Educational Assessment, 23(2), 121-138.
DOI
|
29 |
Martin, T., & Sherin, B. (2013). Learning analytics and computational techniques for detecting and evaluating patterns in learning: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 511-520.
DOI
|
30 |
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.
DOI
|
31 |
Negnevitsky, M. (2005). Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
|
32 |
Nehm, R. H., Ha, M., & Mayfield, E. (2012). Transforming biology assessment with machine learning: automated scoring of written evolutionary explanations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 183-196.
DOI
|
33 |
Ong, N., Litman, D., & Brusilovsky, A. (2014). Ontology-based argument mining and automatic essay scoring. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining (pp. 24-28). Baltimore, MD.
|
34 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
|
35 |
Park, C., Kim, Y, Kim, J, Song, J., & Choi, H. (2015). R data mining. Seoul: Kyowoo.
|
36 |
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Harlow: Pearson.
|
37 |
Park, E. L., & Cho, S. (2014). KoNLPy: Korean natural language processing in Python. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Human & Cognitive Language Technology (pp. 133-136). Chuncheon, Korea.
|
38 |
Park, J., & Kim, H.-B. (2018). Exploring Teachers' Responsive Teaching Practice in Argumentation-Based Science Classroom: Focus on Structural and Dialogical Aspects of Argument. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 38(1), 69-85.
DOI
|
39 |
Ripley, B., & Venables, W. (2020). Package 'nnet'. R package version, 7.3-14. Retrieved April 28, 2020, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nnet
|
40 |
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science education, 92(3), 447-472.
DOI
|
41 |
Shen, L. (2019). A Study on Functions of Korean Discourse Markers (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Yonsei University, Seoul.
|
42 |
Shin, H. S. & Kim, H.-J. (2012). Development of the Analytic Framework for Dialogic Argumentation Using the TAP and a Diagram in the Context of Learning the Circular Motion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 1007-1026.
DOI
|
43 |
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International journal of science education, 28(2-3), 235-260.
DOI
|
44 |
Song, J., Kang, S. J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., ... & Son, Y. A. (2019). Contents and Features of' Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)'for the Next Generation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 39(3), 465-478.
DOI
|
45 |
Yoo, J. E. (2015). Random forests, an alternative data mining technique to decision tree. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 28(2), 427-448.
|
46 |
Song, M.-Y., Noh, E.-H., & Sung, K.-H. (2016). Analysis on the Accuracy of Automated Scoring for Korean Large-scale Assessments. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(1), 255-274.
DOI
|
47 |
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|
48 |
Yang, I. H., Lee, H. J., Lee, H. N., & Cho, H. J. (2009). The development of rubrics to assess scientific argumentation. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 29(2), 203-220.
|
49 |
Yoo. J. E. (2019). Machine Learning for Large-scale/Panel Data and Learning Analytics Data Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 313-338.
DOI
|
50 |
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
DOI
|
51 |
Kang, N.-H., & Lee, E. K. (2013). Argument and argumentation: A review of literature for clarification of translated words. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 33(6), 1119-1138.
DOI
|
52 |
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine learning, 20(3), 273-297.
DOI
|
53 |
Ah, H. Y. (2018). A Study of Counter-Arguments as Observed in Debate of High School Students (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Pusan national university, Pusan.
|
54 |
Baek, Y. K. (1989). The Educational Potentials of Expert Systems. Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1), 79-91.
|
55 |
Beggrow, E. P., Ha, M., Nehm, R. H., Pearl, D., & Boone, W. J. (2014). Assessing scientific practices using machine-learning methods: How closely do they match clinical interview performance?. Journal of Science education and Technology, 23(1), 160-182.
DOI
|
56 |
Bridgeman, B., Trapani, C., & Attali, Y. (2012). Comparison of human and machine scoring of essays: Differences by gender, ethnicity, and country. Applied Measurement in Education, 25(1), 27-40.
DOI
|
57 |
Buchanan, B. G., & Feigenbaum, E. A. (1980). The stanford heuristic programming project: Goals and activities. AI Magazine, 1(1), 25-30.
DOI
|
58 |
Cho, H. S., & Nam, J. (2014). The impact of the argument-based modeling strategy using scientific writing implemented in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 583-592.
DOI
|
59 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
60 |
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of research in education, 32(1), 268-291.
DOI
|
61 |
Engin, G., Aksoyer, B., Avdagic, M., Bozanli, D., Hanay, U., Maden, D., & Ertek, G. (2014). Rule-based Expert Systems for Supporting University Students. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 22-31.
DOI
|
62 |
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science education, 88(6), 915-933.
DOI
|