DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고등학교 가정과 선택과목 개발을 위한 미국 고등학교 가정과 교육과정 사례 연구: 미국 오하이오 주(州)를 중심으로

Examining the Family and Consumer Sciences Curriculum in the Unites States for Developing the Home Economics Elective Courses for South Korean High Schools: A Case Study of the State of Ohio

  • 투고 : 2020.09.18
  • 심사 : 2020.11.16
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31

초록

본 연구의 목적은 다양한 가정과 진로 선택과목을 개발해 운영하고 있는 오하이오 주 가정과 교육과정 사례를 살펴, 우리나라 고교학점제를 대비하기 위한 가정과 진로 선택과목 개발에 관한 시사점을 도출하는 데 있다. 이를 위해 오하이오 주 교육청 홈페이지에서 교육과정 문서 19건을 다운받아 분석에 활용하였다. 본 연구의 연구 결과와 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 오하이오 주가 제시한 가정과 진로 계열은 학문적 특성, 대학 입시, 학생들의 관심과 요구, 사회의 변화 등을 고려해 개발한 것으로, 이를 참고하여 우리나라 가정과 교육 실정에 맞는 가정과 진로 계열을 개발할 필요가 있다. 둘째, 오하이오 주 가정과 교육은 4개의 가정과 진로 계열과 각 계열에서 이수할 수 있는 총 18개의 선택과목명과 내용체계를 제시하고 있었다. 이에 한국 가정과교육학회 차원에서 TF팀을 구성하여 '가정 진로 계열'-'대학 학과'-'진로 선택과목' 안을 개발한 뒤, 이를 기반으로 가정과 진로 선택과목에 관한 고등학생들의 요구를 파악해 수요자 중심의 진로 선택과목을 개발할 필요가 있을 것이다. 셋째, 일반 선택과목인 '기술·가정(가정 교과)', 그리고 진로 선택과목인 '가정 과학'의 위계성과 내용 계열성을 고려하여, 가정과 진로 선택과목을 이수하기 위한 기초과목으로써 새로운 일반 선택과목 개발이 필요하다. 마지막으로 고등학생들의 대입 전형에 실제적인 도움이 주기위해 입학사정관, 가정과 교육과정 전문가, 진로 교사, 대입 전문가, 교수, 가정과 교사들을 대상으로 심층 면담을 실시 및 의견을 반영하여 가정 계열 대학 진학을 위해 필요한 진로 선택과목을 개발할 필요가 있을 것이다.

The purpose of this study is to review and draw lessons from the case of Family and Consumer Sciences(FCS) curriculums in Ohio and to provide implications to the designing of HE elective courses for high schools in Korea. For this, 19 curriculum documents that are available from the website of the Ohio Ministry of Education were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, the following conclusions were drawn: First, following the example of the Ohio Pathway which was developed in consideration of the characteristics of the field, college admission, student's interests, and the societal change, it is recommended that Korean HE curriculum consider developing HE Pathway that reflects the characteristics of Korean HE education system. Second, Ohio's FCS curriculum offers a well-structured system consisting of total 18 courses and contents within the four broad FCS Pathway themes. Thus, it is suggested that the Korean Home Economics Education Association organize a task force to develop 'HE Pathways'-'College majors'-'Elective career focused courses', and student-centered career exploratory elective courses focusing on the students' needs. Third, it is necessary for HE teachers and professors to newly develop basic elective courses which lays the foundation for understanding of Home Economics and help students to follow advanced HE elective courses. Lastly, there is a need for designing career-focused elective courses that can provide practical resources for the college admission process by interviewing college admission officers, education specialists, career counselors, college admission specialists, home economic professors and teachers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, S. H., & Shim, U. J. (2014). How relevant are high school students' curricular choices to their aptitudes and career interests?. Journal of Korean Education, 41(2), 57-79. doi:0.22804/jke.2014.41.2.003
  2. Bang, J. W. (2006). Principles and concepts of the sequence in history education. Studies on History Education, 3, 7-60.
  3. Brunswick high school (2020. 8. 30). Family and consumer sciences course offerings. Retrieved from https://www.bcsoh.org/page/537
  4. Choi, H. S. (2016). A study on the plan for increasing curricular options for students. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea.
  5. Choi, J. H., & Jang, Y. O. (2000). A study of factors affecting on high school students' choice of 'the science of home-economics' course in the 7th national curriculum. Korean Home Economics Association, 12(3), 157-170.
  6. Hilliard City Schools (2020. 8. 30). 2020-2021 High school program of studies. Hilliard city schools. Retrieved from https://www.hilliardschools.org/
  7. Hong, H. J. (2018). Understanding and practical design of high school credit system. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(1), 69-724. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.1.699
  8. Jung, E. J. (2020). Reinforcement of the selection right and substantialization of Korean music education under the introduction of the high school credit system. Journal of the Society of Study for Korean Music Education, 14(1), 213-240. doi:10.31177/SSKME.2020.14.1.07
  9. Kim, D. U. (2019). Analysis on organizing student selective curriculum of highschool credit system research school and the tendency of subjects selection by students. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 131-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000242887
  10. Kim, D. Y., & Woo, O. H. (2019). An international comparative study of high school credit system. The Korea educational review, 25(3), 1-27. doi:10.29318/KER.25.3.1
  11. Kim, E. J., Kwon, Y. J., & Lee, Y. J. (2013). The direction for revising the achievement standards in Korean home economics education: focusing on the comparison with the u.s. national standards. Korean Home Economics Association, 25(1), 37-54. doi:G704-000502.2013.25.1.009
  12. Kim, H. Y. & Hong, H. J. (2018). The features of high school credit system in U.S. and its implications for Korean high school credit system: Focused on North Carolina. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 56(1), 246-277. doi:10.30916/KERA.56.1.245
  13. Kim, L., & Cho, J. S. (2008). The needs of housing contents in high school home economics among students. Korean Home Economics Association, 20(3), 145-161.
  14. Kim, S. B. (2012). A comparative study of American national standards for Family and Consumer Sciences(FCS) education and fcs curricula in the United States: Focusing on Maryland, Minnesota, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea National University of Education, Chungbuk, Korea.
  15. Kim, S. B. (2020). An analysis and implications on the content system of home economics curriculum in Ohio, U.S.: Focusing on curriculums in 2007 and 2015. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(10), 503-531. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.10.503
  16. Kim, S. H. (2005). The current practices and teacher's perceptions of highschool home economics education: focusing on Busan, Ulsan and Kyoungnam area. Korean Home Economics Association, 17(2), 61-77.
  17. Kim., H. S., & Yoo, T. M. (2007). A comparative study of Korean home economic curriculum and American practical problem focused family & consumer sciences curricula. Korean Home Economics Association, 19(4), 91-117.
  18. Kwon, Y. J., & Lim, Y. J. (2020). Elective course status and need related to high school technology.home economics. Korean Home Economics Association, 32(2), 179-192. doi:2020.06.32.2.179 https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.06.32.2.179
  19. Kwon, Y. J., Kim, E. J., & Lee, Y. J. (2013). A comparative analysis of South Korean and the U.S. home economics curricula and achievement standards. Korean Home Economics Association, 25(4), 29-46.
  20. Lancaster City Schools (2016). Lancaster high school FCS course options and descriptions. Retrieved from https://www.lancaster.k12.oh.us/
  21. Lee, D. M. (2016). Analyzing the semantic structure of the 2015 revised high school travel geography curriculum. Journal of the association of Korean geographers, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.5.1.1
  22. Lee, J. H. (2012). An analysis of 「clothing and fashion」 part in high school home economics science textbooks. Unpublished master's thesis, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  23. Lee, J. K., Ha, M. S., & Shin, S. I. (2019). Exploring the high school students' perception of relationships among history of science, science, and history: focus on 'history of science' in the 2015 revised science curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(5), 613-624. doi:10.14697/jkase.2019.39.5.613
  24. Lee, K. U. (2014). A study on the direction of curriculum development (CRC 2014-7). Chungcheongbukdo: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  25. Lee, S. E., & Baek, S. H. (2019). An exploration for the possibility of broadening a range of high school electives: considering current subjects taught by teachers and their perceptions of teaching additional subjects. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 36(2), 49-73. doi:10.24211/tjkte.2019.36.2.49
  26. Lee, S. E., & Jang, D. H. (2019). Issues and tasks of student's selective curriculum in high school credit system policy. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(14), 109-136. doi:10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.14.109
  27. Lee, S. H. (2004). Principles of curriculum development. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  28. Ministry of Education (2015). Press release on 2015 revised curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.kice.re.kr.
  29. Ministry of Education (2017. 11. 27.). The direction of the promotion of the high school credit system and the research school operation plan (proposal). Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  30. Kwon, Y. M., Song, H. Y., & Choi, Y. S. (2018). A course selection guidebook related to students' career and academics in accordance with 2015 revised curriculum (Ministry of Education Announcement No. 2015-74). Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  31. National Asociation of State Administrators for Family and Consumer Sciences (1998). National standards for family and consumer sciences education. NASAFACS. Retrieved from http://www.nasafacs.org/
  32. Ohio Department Education (2015). Family and consumer sciences carer filed technical content standards. Ohio Office of Education. Retrieved from http://education.ohio.gov/
  33. Ohio Department Education (2016). 091201 Introduction to family and consumer sciences. Ohio Office of Education. Retrieved from http://ohio.gov
  34. Park, K. S. (2018). Current status and tasks to implement intellectual property education in high schools of South Korea. The Journal of Intellectural property, 34, 34-49.
  35. Park, K. S. (2019). Developing teacher competency model for a career elective subject of 'introduction to intellectual property'. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 36(1), 217-247. doi:10.24211/tjkte.2019.36.1.214
  36. Park, K. S., & Lim, Y. J. (2018). Development and effect of implementing teacher training program for the subject of 'introduction to intellectual property' in the 2015 revised national curriculum. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 35(3), 39-371. doi:0.24211/tjkte.2018.35.3.339
  37. Park, K. S., Choi, Y. H., Lee, Y. H., Hwang, Y. H., & Hong, Y. J. (2017). A study on the operation model of 2017 intelligent property course. Seoul: Korean Intellectual Property Office.Korea Invention Promotion Association.
  38. Park, M. J. (2015). A discussion on the development direction of the 2015 Practical Arts (Technology.Home Economics) curriculum. Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Korean Home Economics Education Association Conference (pp. 50-53). Seoul: Korean Home Economics Education Association.
  39. Park, M. J. (2017). Exploration on the organization of high school home economics selective curriculum for the fourth industrial revolution. Family and Environment Research, 5(5), 539-53. doi:10.6115/fer.2017.039
  40. Park, M. J., Lim, Y. J., Kwon, Y. J., & Lee, K. J. (2020). Technology and home economics teachers' perception of participation in school curriculum organization and high school credit system. Korean Home Economics Association, 32(1), 15-34. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2020.03.32.1.15
  41. Park, M. L. (2018). An investigation into recognizing about music and career elective subjects on high school music teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  42. Shim, S. H., & Kim, H. J. (2016). Special issue: a study on the issues and curriculum development of "travel geography" as the career elective subject in high school for the 2015 revised curriculum. The journal of the Korean association of geographic and environmental education, 24(1), 87-98. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2020.03.32.1.15
  43. Vincenti, V. (1997). Home economics moves into the twenty-first century. Rethinking home economics. In S. Stage & V. Vincenti (Eds.), Rethinking home economics: Women and the history of a profession (pp. 301-320). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  44. Yoo, J. Y. (2006). Necessity of home economics science educational contents: a delphi study. Korean Home Economics Association, 18(2), 125-134.
  45. Yoon, S. H. & Ju, S. E. (2018). Research of the contents of home economics education in Korea and the United States for healing education. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(18), 597-623. doi:10.19031/jkheea.2019.03.31.1.21

피인용 문헌

  1. 가정계열 선택과목에 대한 고등학생의 요구 분석 vol.33, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.6.33.2.173