DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

항공사 조직구성원의 항공안전과 항공보안에 대한 상충적 태도가 조직효과성에 미치는 영향 연구

A Study on the Effect of Airline Staff's Contradictory Attitude between Aviation Safety and Aviation Security to Organizational Effectiveness

  • 김창우 ((주)대한항공 인천여객서비스지점) ;
  • 김기웅 (한국항공대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 박성식 (한국교통대학교 항공운항학과)
  • 투고 : 2020.03.04
  • 심사 : 2020.05.30
  • 발행 : 2020.06.30

초록

This paper has studied the effect of airline staff's perception on both aviation safety and aviation security to their organizational effectiveness. Airline staff's perception on aviation safety is different from that on aviation security due to organizational difference in an airline. Through an empirical analysis, it was analyzed the effect of such perceptional difference on airline's organizational effectiveness. According to the analysis, it was found the perception of aviation safety has a significant positive effect on organizational effectiveness. Airline staff believed the safety is a core value of an airline and emphasizing the safety never impeded the airline's operation including service quality. Secondly, it was proven the perception on abiding by aviation security rules had a significant negative effect on organizational effectiveness. However, emphasizing aviation security had a very significant positive contribution on airline's philosophy of aviation safety. Following the research results, it was suggested an airline look for improving the process and regulations to deal with aviation security in the organization.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gil, H. S., Lee, H. B., and Song, B. H., "A study on the perception of safety program", Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aerospace, 27(3), 2019, pp. 82-89.
  2. Na, I. K., and Yoo, K. E., "Study on the relationship among airport safety management system, safety knowledge and safety behavior -case of Incheon International Airport airside workers", Journal of the Korean Society for Aviation and Aerospace, 26(4), 2018, pp. 43-53.
  3. Juen, K. I., Lee, W. G., and Son, K. S., "Application for settling down safety culture", Journal of Korean Culture Industry, 15(4), 2015, pp. 135-143.
  4. Pettersen, K., and Aase, K., "Explaining safe work practices in aviation line maintenance", Safety Science, 46(3), pp. 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.020
  5. Gao, Y., Bruce P. J., and Rajendran, N., "Safety climate of a commercial airline: A cross sectional comparison of four occupational groups", Journal of Air Transport Management, 47, 2015, pp. 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.05.010
  6. IATA Safety Fact Sheet, 2019.
  7. Mearns, K., Hope, L., Ford, M., and Tetrick, L. E., "Investment in workforce health: exploring the implications for workforce safety climate and commitment", Accident Analysis an Prevention, 42(5), 2010, pp. 1445-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.009
  8. Bergheim, K., Eid, J., Hystad, S. W., Nielsen, M. B., Mearns, K., Larsson, G., and Luthans, B., "The role of psychological capital in perception of safety climate among air traffic controllers", Journal of Leadership Organization Study, 20(2), 2013, pp. 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813475483
  9. Yoo, K. W., "A concept and activity of aviation security", Journal of Aviation Development of Korea, 27, 2002, pp. 70-93.
  10. Yoo, K. W., and Kim, J. C., "A responsible frameworks for effective aviation security at airport", Journal of Aviation Development of Korea, 2005, pp. 180-196.
  11. ICAO Annex 17 - Security, 2002.
  12. Petteren, K. A., and Bjornskau, T., "Organizational contradictions between safety and security - Perceived challenges and ways of integrating critical infrastructure protection in civil aviation", Safety Science, 2014, pp. 1-12.
  13. Mueller, J., and Stewart, M. G., "The terrorism delusion-americas overwrought response to September 11", International Security, 37(1), 2012, pp. 81-110. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00089
  14. Biswas, S., "Relationship between psychological climate and turnover intentions and its impact on organizational effectiveness: A study in Indian Organizations", IIMB Management Review, 22, 2010, pp. 102-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2010.04.013
  15. Fallon, T., and Brinkerhoff, R. O., "Framework for organizational effectiveness", Paper presented at the American Society for Training and Development International Conference, 1996.
  16. Lee, H., and Choi, B., "Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination", Journal of Management Information System, 20(1), pp. 179-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
  17. Cameron, K. S., "Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness", Management Science, 32(5), 1986, pp. 539-553. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539
  18. Cameron, K. S., and Whetton, D. A., "Perceptions of organizational effectiveness over organizational life cycles", Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 1981, pp. 525-544. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392338
  19. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., and Crawford, E. R., "Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance", Academy of Management Journal, 53, 2010, pp. 617-635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
  20. Bakker, A. B., and Schaufeli, W. B., "Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 2008, pp. 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.515
  21. Kataria, A., Garg, P., and Rastogi, R., "Organizational effectiveness as a function of employee engagement", South Asian Journal of Management, 20(4), 2013, pp. 56-73.
  22. LaPorte, T. M., "Organizational strategies for complex systems resilience, reliability, and adaptation", In: Auerswald, P., Branscomb, L., LaPorte, T., Michel Kerjan, E. O. (Eds.), Seeds of Disasters. Cambridge University Press, New York. 2006.