DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Breast Dose on Plain Abdominal Position

복부 방사선검사 자세가 유방선량에 미치는 영향

  • 주영철 (삼성서울병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 김승혁 (삼성서울병원 영상의학과)
  • Received : 2020.05.20
  • Accepted : 2020.06.08
  • Published : 2020.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of posture changes(Anteroposterior projection, Posteroanterior projection) in the plain abdominal examination on breast dose and to examine its clinical usefulness. This study was used a human body phantom and a glass dosimeter. Glass dosimeters were directly inserted from the center and outside of medial and lateral. In this study, the deep dose was measured in the right breast and the surface dose in the left breast. During the abdominal examination, the central X-ray incident point was perpendicularly incident to the image receptor 5 cm above the iliac crest. The exposure parameters were 82 kVp, 320 mA, 50 ms, x-ray field size 14×17 inch The distance between the center X-ray and the detector was fixed at 110 cm, and only the top two AEC chambers were used. As a result of this study, the medial and lateral side doses of the right breast were 535.73±30.68 μGy and 414.46±33.52 μGy for erect AP, and 145.80±18.52 μGy and 148.76±12.92 μGy in erect PA. The superficial breast dose was 754.00±68.36 μGy on the medial side and 674.06±45.58 μGy on the lateral side in the erect AP, 70.66±7.98 μGy on the medial side, and 86.46±15.35 μGy on the lateral side in the erect PA. There was a statistically significant difference in the difference between the mean values of the medial and lateral side doses in the deep and superficial areas of the breast according to the postural change (p <0.01). As a result of this study, If the abdominal radiography was examined in the PA position, the dose reduction effect was 72.78% on the medial side, 64.10% on the lateral side of the deep breast, 90.62% on the medial side, and 87.17% on the lateral side of the superficial breast compared to the AP position.

Keywords

References

  1. Kahnzada TW, Samad A, Zulfiqar I. Abuse of plain abdominal radiographs in abdominal pain. Rawal Med J. 2007;32(1):48-50.
  2. Kang BS, Kim SC, Kim HS, Kim HS, Moon HS, Min JH, et al. Radiographic Imaging. 3rd ed. Seoul: Daihaks; 2014.
  3. The Korean Society of Medical Imaging Technology. TEXTBOOK of Radiographic Positioning and Clinical Diagnosis. 6th ed. Seoul: Chung-Ku; 2019.
  4. Feyler S, Williamson V, King D. Plain abdominal radiographs in acute medical emergencies: An abused investigation? Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2002;78(916):94-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.78.916.94
  5. MFDS. Guidelines for patient dose recommendations in the abdomen, pelvis and lumbar radiography. Radiation Safty Management Series, No.25, 11-1470000-002660-01, 2012.
  6. UNSCEAR 2000 Report Vol. I Source and Effects of Ionization. Annex D Medical Radiation Exposure. UNSECAR: 2000.
  7. Metaxas VI, Messaris GA, Lekatou AN, Petsas TG, Panayiotakis GS. Patient doses in common diagnostic X-ray examinations. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2019;184(1):12-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy169
  8. Aliasgharzadeh A, Mihandoost E, Masoumbeigi M, Salimian M, Mohseni M. Measurement of entrance skin dose and calculation of effective dose for common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Kashan, Iran. Global Journal of Health Science. 2015;7(5):202.
  9. Hawking N, Elmore A. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality. Radiologic Technology. 2009;80(5):411-9.
  10. Koo NH, Yoon HS, Choi KW, Lee JE, Kim JJ. The effect of body mass index on entrance surface air kerma in abdominal X-ray radiography using automatic exposure control. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2018;12(5):659-67. https://doi.org/10.7742/JKSR.2018.12.5.659
  11. Cho JH, Lee HY, Im IC. Monitoring on dose index analyzed in the mammography. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2016;10(7):477-82. https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2016.10.7.477
  12. Kwak YG, Kim CY, Jeong SP. Research on dose reduction during computed tomography scanning by CARE kV system and bismuth. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2014;14(8):233-42. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.233
  13. Padovani R, Contento G, Fabretto M, Malisan M, Barbina V, Gozzi G. Patient doses and risks from diagnostic radiology in North-east Italy. The British Journal of Radiology. 1987;60(710):155-65. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-60-710-155
  14. an Ghearr FAN, Brennan PC. The PA projection of the abdomen: A dose reducing technique. Radiography. 1998;4(3):195-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1078-8174(98)80046-1
  15. Marshall N, Faulkner K, Busch H, Marsh D, Pfenning H. A comparison of radiation dose in examination of the abdomen using different radiological imaging techniques. The British Journal of Radiology. 1994;67(797):478-84. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-67-797-478
  16. Jin GH. Dose reduction of the adolescent female breast during scoliosis radiography. Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology. 2018;12(3):373-9. https://doi.org/10.7742/JKSR.2018.12.3.373