한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제40권2호
  • /
  • Pages.151-161
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 '기능'에 대한 비판적 검토

Critical Review of 'Skills' in the 2015 Revised Science National Curriculum

  • 투고 : 2020.02.17
  • 심사 : 2020.04.21
  • 발행 : 2020.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

2015 개정 교육과정의 '내용 체계'에는 '핵심 개념', '일반화된 지식', '기능'이 새롭게 도입되었고, 이 중 '기능'의 경우 과학과 교육과정에서는 명확하게 정의되어 있지 않다. 그리고 과학 교과의 모든 '영역'에서 '기능'을 획일적으로 제시하는 문제가 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 '내용 체계'에 새롭게 도입된 '기능'에 대한 비판적 문제 인식 및 고찰을 통해 교사들의 '기능'에 대한 명확한 이해와 이로부터 개정된 교육과정의 철학이 현장에 잘 적용되길 의도하였다. 먼저 '기능'을 교육과정에 도입하는데 참고한 NGSS의 '과학·공학 실천'을 살펴보고 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정에서 제시하고 있는 '기능'의 문제점을 확인하였다. 또 타 교과 및 이전 교육과정과의 '기능'과 '탐구'를 비교하여 비판적으로 분석하였다. 이러한 비판적 분석을 바탕으로 첫째, 과학과 핵심 역량을 구현할 수 있는 '기능' 항목의 도입 및 각 항목에 대한 명확한 정의, 둘째, 교과, '영역', '핵심 개념', 학년(군)에 따라 적합한 '기능'의 제시 및 '기능'의 적용을 위한 방법에 대한 구체적 기술, 그리고 셋째 '성취기준'에서 '기능'의 직접적 제시가 필요함을 제언하였다.

The 'core concepts', 'generalized knowledge', and 'skills' are newly introduced in the 'contents system' of the 2015 revised national curriculum, and the 'skills' are not clearly defined in the science curriculum. There is a problem of uniformly presenting 'skills' in all 'areas' of science subjects. In this study, it was intended that the teachers' clear understanding of the 'skills' and the philosophy of the revised curriculum would be applied to the school classrooms through the critical problem recognition and consideration of 'skills' newly introduced in the 'contents system' of the 2105 revised science curriculum. First, we reviewed 'science and engineering practice' in the NGSS, which was a reference to the introduction to the curriculum, and identified the problems of 'skills' presented in the science curriculum. It also analyzed critically by comparing 'skills' and 'practices' with other subjects and previous curriculum. Based on this critical analysis, we suggested the following. First, introduce 'skills' items that can implement scientific key competencies, and clearly define each item. Second, present 'skills' that are appropriate according to the subject, 'area', 'core concept', and grade(group) and describe in detail how to apply 'skills' and, third, present 'skills' directly in 'achievement standards'.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Byun, S., & Kim, H. (2011). Recognition of free inquiry activity and its effects on the science inquiry ability of middle school students. J Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu, 31(2), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2011.31.2.210
  2. Chung, H. (2016). Critical review of the key concept-centered content system of the 2015 revised education curriculum with a focus on the Korean language curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(3), 29-50.
  3. Dong, H., Ha, S., & Kim, Y. (2015). A comparative analysis of achievement standards of Korean science curriculum and performance expectation of next generation science standards (NGSS) in the United States: content elements and objectives for middle school life science. Educational Research, 64, 95-125. https://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2015.64..004
  4. Han, H., Kim, Y., Lee, J., Kwak, S., Kim, G., Kim, G., Kim, Y., Park, J., Jin, D., Choi, D., Han, C., & Hwan, Y. (2015). A study on the development of the general guidance in the 2015 revised national curriculum (Research Report CRC 2015-28). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Science and Creativity.
  5. Hwang, I. (2015). A reflection on the contents & framework of the 2015 moral subject curriculum. Journal of Moral & Ethics Education, 48, 81-110. https://doi.org/10.18338/kojmee.2015..48.81
  6. Jang, Y. et al. (2015a). An initiative development study for the 2015 revised science curriculum (Research Report). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Science and Creativity.
  7. Jang, Y. et al. (2015b). An initiative development study for the 2015 revised science curriculum II (Research Report BD15110002). Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Science and Creativity.
  8. Jeong, J., & Kang, N. (2016). Comparison of Korean and US achievement expectations for physics in school education. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 66(6), 705-718. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.66.705
  9. Jho, H. (2018). An analysis of elements of scientific inquiry presented in 2015 revised national science curriculum: focusing on scientific inquiry experiment. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 22(3), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2018.22.3.208
  10. Jo, S. (2015). A review on direction of the 2015 revised national curriculum development through teachers' planning, The Journal of Elementary Education, 28(3). 199-227.
  11. Hong, M., Park, S., Baek, S., Byun, H., Yang, Y., Yang, J., Lee, K., Lee, M., & Han, H. (2012). Research and development of achievement standards and achievement levels based on the 2009 revised national curriculum -An analysis of the national curriculum and development achievement standards (CRC 2012-1). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  12. Kang, N. (2014). The Implications of NGSS in Korean Curriculum. KNUE J. C & I, 14(1), 1-25.
  13. Kang, N. (2016). 2016 Web megazine Science teacher, 10-11. Accessed Mar. 29. https://www.koreascience.org/news/download.
  14. Kang, N., Oh, P., Kim, Y., & Bang, D. (2014). Redesign of science curriculum based on the US NGSS. Report 2014. Seoul: Korea Foundation for the Science and Creativity.
  15. Kim, E., Ahn, J., Kim, H., & Yu, W. (2016). Effects of teachers' interest in the 2015 national curriculum on the intention to participate in professional development. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(1), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2016.19.1.23
  16. Kim, H. (2015). Issues of 2015 revision history curriculum in terms of curriculum-making principle. Studies on History Education, 23, 7-49. https://doi.org/10.16976/kahe.2015..23.7
  17. Kim, M., & Kim, Y. (2019). Analysis of the relationship between achievement standards and Subject Competencies of the 2015 revised mathematics curriculum: focusing on content system 'skill'. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(18), 845-873.
  18. Lee, E., & Kang, S. (2012). Sub-component extraction of inquiry skills for direct teaching of inquiry skills. J Korea Assoc. Sci. Edu, 32(2), 236-261. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.236
  19. Lee, G., & Hong, H. (2017). Analysis on the meaning change of the term 'core concept' in the 2015 revised national curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 20(2), 1-30.
  20. Lee, G., Ohn, J., & Baik, N. (2014). Composition of curriculum contents and exploration of achievement standards statement method (2nd National Curriculum Expert Forum Collection). 53-68.
  21. Lee, K., & Jeung, Y. (2017). A reflective review on constitution of content system in 2015 revised subject curriculum: focused on key concept, generalized knowledge, and skill. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(16), 597-622.
  22. Lee, K., Jeung, Y., Seo, Y., Jung, C., Choi, J., Park, M., Lee, B., Jin, E., Yu, J., Lee, K., Park, S., Ju, H., Baek, N., On, J., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2014). A study on the guide lines for subject curriculum development (KICE Research Report CRC-2014-7). Seoul: KICE.
  23. Lee, K., Jeung, Y., Min, Y., Lee, K., Lee, J., Lee, M., Kim, C., Pak, B., Mo, K., Park, C., Chin, J., Park, K., Kwak, Y., Jin, E., Seo, J., Lee, K., Park, S., Imm, C., Ohn, J., & Kim, S. (2015). Research for coordinating the revision process of subject curricular II (KICE Research Report CRC 2015-25-1). Seoul: KICE.
  24. Lim, Y., & Hong, H. (2016). A study on the presentation form of education content in the 2015 revised national subject curricula: focused on content framework. Asian Journal of Education, 17(3), 277-302. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2016.09.17.3.277
  25. Ministry of Education(MOE). (1997). Science curriculum. Notification No. 1997-15. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  26. Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015a). The general explanation of 2015 revised national curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 1]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  27. Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015b). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 9]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  28. Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015c). Korean language curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 5]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  29. Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015d). Mathematics curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 8]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  30. Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015e). English curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 14]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  31. Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015f). Social studies curriculum. Notification No. 2015-74 [issue 7]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  32. Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development(MEHRD). (2007). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2007-79 [issue 4]. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.
  33. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology(MEST). (2009). Elementary and secondary school curriculum : General statement. Notification No. 2009-41. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  34. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology(MEST). (2011). 2009 Revised National science curriculum. No 2011-361 [issue 9]. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  35. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology(MEST). (2009). Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum : General Statement. Notification No. 2009-41 of the MEST. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  36. Min, Y., Jung, Y., Lee, J., Nho, E., Shin, H., Yang, S., Yu, C., Lee, K., Kim, J., Kwak, Y., Jun, J., Lee, H., & Park, J. (2018). A study on the analysis and improvement of the contents system of curriculum(KICE Research Report CRC 2018-22). Jincheon: KICE.
  37. Mo, K., Kang, D., & Eun, J. (2016). Major changes and issues in the 2015 revised social studies curriculum. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 48(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.35557/TRCE.48.1.201603.001
  38. Nam, H. (2016). Analysis and characteristics of content construction of 2015 revised middle school history curriculum. History Education Review, 60, 3-42.
  39. National Research Council(NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.
  40. National Research Council(NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.
  41. National Research Council(NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on conceptual framework for the new K-12 science education standards. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
  42. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For States, By States. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
  43. Oh, Y. (2016). Approach from the policy dimension For the realization of the Korean core competency curriculum. Korean Language Education, 154, 229-256.
  44. Park, S., & Kim, H. (2019). Comparative analysis of the 2015 revised science curriculum and US next generation science standards -focusing on ecosystem related concepts in elementary school courses. Biology Education, 47(3), 336-353. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2019.47.3.336
  45. Seo, Y. (2015). Major i ssues and tasks o f the 2015 revised Korean language curriculum-focused on Korean language subject in the common curriculum. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 56, 67-106.
  46. Seol, K. (2015). A reflection on characteristics and process of the development of the 2015 society & culture curriculum. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 47(4), 63-105. https://doi.org/10.35557/trce.47.4.201512.003
  47. Song, J., Kang, N., Gwak, Y., Na, J., Bang, D., Sohn, Y., Shim, G., Lee, G., Lee, B., Jeon, W., & Choi, I. (2014). A study on the reorganization of integrated science curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education. 31-146.
  48. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design(2e). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  49. Yang, S. (2019). The reflective consideration for the content system of 2015 revised mathematics curriculum - Focused on key concept, generalized knowledge and skill. School Mathematics, 21(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2019.06.21.2.347
  50. Yun, D., Ko, E., & Choi, A. (2018). Identifying and applying competencies of five scientific core competencies in the 2015 science curriculum. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(24), 1301-1319.

피인용 문헌

  1. 2015 개정 중학교 공통 교과와 가정과 교육과정에 제시된 '기능'과 '성취기준' 비교 분석 vol.33, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.17
  2. Teaching Korean science for Indonesian middle school students: promoting Indonesian students’ attitude towards science through the global science exchange programme vol.43, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1938278