Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Practical Design of Citizen Participatory Appraisal

시민참여형 평가의 실천적 설계를 위한 연구

  • 이경래 (한신대학교 대학원 기록관리학과)
  • Received : 2020.04.07
  • Accepted : 2020.05.12
  • Published : 2020.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Citizen participatory appraisal is a methodology of record practice that draws citizen participation in the evaluation process in various forms based on evaluation documentation. This study aims to address practical concerns about what kind of citizen participatory appraisal can be used locally and what specific design can be drawn. To this end, this study designs specific measures for citizens to recognize and monitor the responsibility of the national archives in the domestic record appraisal environment, focusing on thorough appraisal documentation and disclosure, the introduction of public consultation, and the initiative of citizen agenda.

시민참여형 평가는 평가 도큐멘테이션을 그 단초로 해서 다양한 형태로 평가과정에 시민의 참여를 끌어내는 기록실천의 방법론이다. 본 연구는 실제 국내에 적용 가능한 시민참여형 평가 방안이 과연 무엇이고 어떤 구체적 설계를 그릴 수 있을까라는 실천적 고민을 담으려 한다. 이를 위해 철저한 평가도큐멘테이션과 공개, 공공 컨설테이션 도입, 시민 의제 발의권을 중심으로, 국내 기록평가 환경에서 시민 자신이 국가 기록기관의 책임을 인지하고 감시하며 그로부터 적극 의견을 개진할 수 있는 방안을 설계하고 구체화한다. 먼저 2장에서는 시민참여의 관점에서 국내 공공기록 평가의 현재 문제점을 진단한다. 3장에서는 서구 시민참여형 평가 방식을 우리 환경에 주체적으로 적용할 수 있는 방안을 설계하는데 집중한다. 그리고 마지막 4장에서는 기록인 및 시민운동가 등 관련 전문가 포커스그룹인터뷰(FGI)를 실시하여, 시민참여형 평가 방안에 대한 의견을 취합 조사하고, 현장에서 시민참여형 평가 유형과 절차를 적용하는데 있어 유효성을 타진하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, You-seung (2019). A Study on Public Records Appraisal Policies in the Digital Age: Based on the Case of The National Archives in the UK. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 62, 5-39. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.62.005
  2. Park, Mi-ae (2019). A Study on the Records Appraisal Review: Focusing on the Education Office Records Center. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 61, 157-190. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.61.157
  3. Seol, Moon-won (2018). Redesigning Archival Appraisal Policies for Improving Accountability of Public Bodies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 66, 5-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2018.55.005
  4. Seol, Moon-won (2020). Managing Information as Records Asset: Public Records Policies in the Digital Transformation Era. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 63, 5-36. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2020.63.005
  5. Seol, Moon-won, & Lee, Seung-eok (2020). Major Issues and Tasks of Restructuring Public Records Appraisal System. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(1), 47-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.1.047
  6. Sinn, Donghee (2020). Records and Archival Appraisal from a Holistic Perspective: A Case Study of New York State Archives. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 20(1), 177-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2020.20.1.177
  7. Lee, Kyong Rae (2019). The Distribution of Responsibility and Authority upon Public Record Appraisal: Focused on 'Citizen Participation Appraisal'. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 60, 49-88. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2019.60.049
  8. Choi, Jae Hee (2014). A Survey on Archival Appraisal System and Practice in Korea as Well as Its Modification. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 14(4), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.153
  9. Hyun, Moonsoo (2019). A Study on the Distribution of Authorities and Responsibilities to Appraise Records of Central or Federal Governments in Britain, the USA, Canada, and Australia. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 19(4), 175-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2019.19.4.175
  10. Bailey, C. (2013). Past imperfect? Reflections on the evolution of Canadian federal government records appraisal. Archivaria, 75, 5-47.
  11. Cabinet Office (2008). Code of Practice on Consultation. Retrieved January 20th, 2020, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/100807/file47158.pdf
  12. Cabinet Office (2013). Information Principles for the UK Public Sector. Retrieved January 20th, 2020, from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/266284/Information_Principles_UK_Public_Sector_final.pdf
  13. National Archives of Australia (2019). Record Authority: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Retrieved January 20th, 2020, from https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-12/agency-ra-2007-00268370.pdf
  14. OECD (2001). Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in policy-making. Paris